I am niether optimistic or naive, those have been the official Russian statements, Russia has said they are developing 3 new programs, PAKDA the new Stealth aircraft, and the light weight fighter (it could be MiG-35 or a new design i have no idea how to confirm it)and a MiG-31 replacement, officials from the Russian aerospace have argued about the wisdom of only having PAKFA as the only export product, type 30 engine has to be test flown in 2017 now is in design.
The only thing you are suggesting me is do not believe them, it is not a matter of faith, it is a matter of time by 2020 we will know.
I'm sorry to say so: You are naïve, overoptimistic and ... You are simply - like You admitted Yourself - a Russian-fan-boy who looks Russian TV and only rephrases parrot-like everything any officials from Russia says without the slightest bit of thinking !
As such it is not a matter of faith, it's a matter of logic, thinking, a bit of math, ratio and even more some common sense !!
they have said they will have 55 aircraft by 2020, a production rate of around 12 aircraft a year has been suggested, you have to wait at least one year or two to see the bort numbers and the final looks, but i agree i think they have frozen the airframe configuration, the round nacelles are much more streamlined but people say these are not stealthy enough, who knows, Russia says the Hymalaya smart skin will do part of the stealth job and the composites the other to keep it concealed, who knows only time will tell
How on earth will they build 55 T-50 by 2020 if they did not finish testing even more operational testing and with 055 in mind if they did not manage to get one single aircraft to the air last year ?? To keep faith that there will be 55 within the next 6 years is not only naïve, it's plain stupid !
As such again it is not a matter of faith, it's again a matter of logic, thinking, a bit of math, ratio and even more some common sense !! ... and I go even further a bit.
I not only ask You for all Your posts ... I give You a clear order after so many repeated requests:
- read, think and consider if it is only the quoting of a propaganda ? If YES, then do not tell it a fact ! Especially only telling "it is from a Russian official" is not a reason to be a fact.
- give source, date and even more quote correctly since these are not Your considerations, these are simply quotes and as such they have to be given in the correct way.
Take this as a moderator's advice and if You cant comply with them I will give You a longer time-out to reconsider the way of posting and discussing here especially in mind of the content's quality You post here and finally to think about if SDF requires a too high level of at least a scientific way or if another forum is better for Your propaganda.
Deino