All points are valid? Really? Including the one where he complained about the stock not being compatible with whatever is considered popular in America? How important is a customisable shoulder stock for a standard issue infantryman rifle? The same applies to a gas valve and welded gas tube. The angle at which the handguard closes could be valid but is scraping the barrel.bogus. All points are valid. The selector is just the most visible problem. The tip of the proverbial iceberg. the Zero issue limits its users potential combat capabilities. The corrosive ammo and cleaning issue makes care and maintenance harder, the sling and stock may seem a nuisance but when you consider Russian infantry in compact thin armored vehicles facing combat situations where they are loosing alot of said vehicles. That could leave a soldier bailing out of a burning vehicle unarmed or not at all.
bogus, completely and utterly uninformed (And I am being nice)
Try convincing a Lamborghini owner that. Factory original parts put in by an authorised garage or GTFO.The rifles in question are not replica nor clones nor knockoff or fakes.
They are rebuilt from certified parts kits. The rail, top cover stock, gas block tube, receiver trunnion were in the kit and Stock AK12 parts. The bolt an barrel were replaced as they had been demilitarized.
Farther as the criticisms are targeted to the parts in the kit with not the replacement parts they have absolute barring. 9 hole even acknowledges that the one they had lacked a change that seems to have occurred in production. A change that would be familiar to anyone who knows M16 history, the change to chrome chambers barrels and gas blocks to address then in US service corrosive ammunition.
In essence you are saying that someone’s isn’t a “real Lamborghini” because the owner bought it used and had to replace muffler, pistons and tires. Everything else is original from the factory. It just wasn’t in running condition until it was repaired. Those rifles are AK12s.
I'm not the one posting an internet review of it. I'm saying wait for feedback from the people actually using it, rather than some Anglo reviewer who's trying to cash in on the "Russia bad" that's infected youtube. And before you point out that one is an ABC and the other is some kind of Mexican I don't care.Seriously. You are conflating personal bias with technical criticism. Brandon Herrera was insulting the Russian government before Ukraine well still wanting to sample the latest AKs. 9 Hole is about as a political in their review as can be.
Frankly I believe your dismissal is as your personal bias is blinding you from anything that doesn’t fit your preconceived notion’s.
As for my personal bias, what would that be? Granted I don't like Ukrainians, but I'm not exactly in love with Russians. Most of their gear this war has been underwhelming apart from their missiles, although I'm prepared to wait until the fog of war clears before casting judgement. In the Ukraine thread I made lots of posts about how poor/non existent Russian drones have been, apart from the Orlan which uses a lots of non-Russian parts for critical components. The Iranians are fielding better drones than the Russians right now. Russian arrogance to Chinese platforms has cost them lives. In the Su-75 thread I thought the whole project was a scam. Yet I'm personally biased somehow.
More like I'm tired of the western narrative that everything Russia makes is bad, and it's all because of corruption. It can't be that bad if despite billions being poured in over 2 months, Ukraine is getting wrecked and haven't been able to mount a single counter offensive the whole war. Something doesn't add up.