Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
... in a Nov. 25 communique, the Elysee said delivery of the ships has been indefinitely postponed.

More recently, French Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said in an interview that Russia should realize that France “may never deliver” the ships.

Source URL:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Hmmm...sounding more and more like the Russians may not get the vessels at all.

France ultimately may try and sell them and then use the proceeds to pay the Russians.

It will be very interesting to see how it pans out.
 

delft

Brigadier
Hmmm...sounding more and more like the Russians may not get the vessels at all.

France ultimately may try and sell them and then use the proceeds to pay the Russians.

It will be very interesting to see how it pans out.
The design is adapted to the requirement of the Russian navy so any other buyer will pay half the original price or there about, while, if I understand the matter rightly, France will have to pay a hefty penalty for non-performance of the contract. In the mean time the main advantage to the Russians is what they learned in the process and most of that will already have been achieved.
Poor French taxpayer.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
The design is adapted to the requirement of the Russian navy so any other buyer will pay half the original price or there about, while, if I understand the matter rightly, France will have to pay a hefty penalty for non-performance of the contract. In the mean time the main advantage to the Russians is what they learned in the process and most of that will already have been achieved.
Poor French taxpayer.

Do you not think it would still be cheaper than handing them over? I mean how much is it going to cost over the years to keep those two LHD in check it will cost a lot more in the long term

It's like me handing over my gun to the local gangster and then I install house alarms and CCTV to make sure he doesn't use gun on my house, then why give him the gun in the first place? He paid me £200 for the pistol but then I will have to spend £2000 on further security to ensure it doesn't come back at me

No better off not handing the gun over so means France should hold on to the two units and find a buyer, I know Turkey would buy buy since France recognise the Armenian genocide it's not going to happen also since the Turkish design is finalised with Spain

I say sell then to Brazil or India
 

thunderchief

Senior Member
While we at it

Hi-tech gear stolen from Russia’s Mistral warship in France

Electronic equipment, including hard drives and a device operating the helicopter carrier’s communications system, has been stolen off the Mistral ship built for Russia in the French port of Saint-Nazaire.

An investigation into the case of the missing equipment has been launched, French media reported. “Sensitive material” could allegedly be stolen from one of the amphibious-assault vessels, constructed by the French in a multi-million dollar deal with Moscow.

READ MORE: Delay in ‘Mistral’ deliveries causing France ‘significant cost’ - reports

The items, which were announced missing on November 25, could have been stolen a week prior to that date, the prosecutor’s office of the French city of Rennes reported.

According to AFP, two computer hard drives, a motherboard, and a graphics card – as well as a device with a program operating the carrier’s communications system – have disappeared from the ship.

All the equipment was installed by French military electronics firm Thales, and could only be operated on the helicopter carrier.

READ MORE: 'Buy the set!': Mistral warships go 'on sale' in Russian & French spoof ads

A spokesman for French shipbuilder DCNS, Emmanuel Godez, confirmed the theft to TASS news agency, but said the unique articles – which he refused to name – did not contain any secret or sensitive data.

French ship builders STX, who are in charge of the Russian-ordered Mistral ship's construction, also confirmed that some items went missing. The company said a relevant statement had been submitted by the corporation to French police.

According to Le Point magazine, a preliminary investigation did not find any evidence of a break-in. Russians are reportedly not suspected to be behind the theft, a spokesperson from France’s Defense Ministry said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
US Readying Military, Economic Options to Russian Missile Treaty Violation
Dec. 11, 2014 - 02:12PM | By PAUL McLEARY | Comments
A
A
RUSSIA-POLITICS-HISTORY-WWII
A column of Russia's Topol intercontinental ballistic missile launchers rolls through Red Square in 2013 in Moscow during the Victory Day parade. (Yuri Kadobnov / Getty Images)
FILED UNDER
World News
Europe
WASHINGTON — Pentagon and State Department officials are reviewing what military and economic options they can employ if Russia continues development of a cruise missile it has tested in violation of a cornerstone nuclear weapons treaty between Washington and Moscow, senior US officials say.

“Russia’s lack of meaningful engagement on this issue — if it persists — will ultimately require the United States to take actions to protect its interests and security along with those of its allies and partners,” Brian McKeon, principal deputy undersecretary of defense for policy told the House Armed Services Committee’s subcommittee on strategic forces on Wednesday.

In July, the United States went public with its concerns that Russia violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) by testing a prohibited ground-launched cruise missile.

The document — signed in 1987 — bans American and Russian ground-launched ballistic or cruise missiles capable of flying between 300 miles and 3,400 miles.

But American officials said the Russians tested a new medium-range, ground-launched cruise missile as early as 2008, and Russian officials have been unresponsive to attempts at dialogue by US officials, most resently at a series of talks in September.

Rose Gottemoeller, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, told the House panel that Russia was also not in compliance with the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, and US officials are concerned that Moscow is also violating other arms treaties.

Since Russia has refused to acknowledge its INF treaty violation, Gottemoeller said that “we are reviewing a series of diplomatic, economic and military measures to protect the interests of the United States and our allies and encourage Russia to uphold its nuclear arms control commitments.”

Echoing McKeon comments about plans being made at the Pentagon, Gottemoeller added that Washington is “assessing options in the military sphere to ensure that Russia would not gain a significant military advantage from its violation of the INF Treaty.”

McKeon said the US could deploy active defenses to counter cruise missiles and beef up US and allied forces in Europe and Asia.

“We do not want to find ourselves engaged in an escalatory cycle of action and reaction,” he insisted, adding that Russian action and US and NATO counter-actions “will make Russia less secure ... . This violation will not go unanswered, because there is too much at stake.” ■
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

joshuatree

Captain
Do you not think it would still be cheaper than handing them over? I mean how much is it going to cost over the years to keep those two LHD in check it will cost a lot more in the long term

It's like me handing over my gun to the local gangster and then I install house alarms and CCTV to make sure he doesn't use gun on my house, then why give him the gun in the first place? He paid me £200 for the pistol but then I will have to spend £2000 on further security to ensure it doesn't come back at me

No better off not handing the gun over so means France should hold on to the two units and find a buyer, I know Turkey would buy buy since France recognise the Armenian genocide it's not going to happen also since the Turkish design is finalised with Spain

I say sell then to Brazil or India

Canada would probably be the best alternate customer, their Amphibious Assault Ship Project is on hold and a discounted Mistral may be a perfect solution to the matter. The French relation (French Quebec) doesn't hurt either.

As for legal compensation, maybe a little assistance from NATO allies would make it easier for France to cancel the delivery a done deal?
 

delft

Brigadier
Do you not think it would still be cheaper than handing them over? I mean how much is it going to cost over the years to keep those two LHD in check it will cost a lot more in the long term

It's like me handing over my gun to the local gangster and then I install house alarms and CCTV to make sure he doesn't use gun on my house, then why give him the gun in the first place? He paid me £200 for the pistol but then I will have to spend £2000 on further security to ensure it doesn't come back at me

No better off not handing the gun over so means France should hold on to the two units and find a buyer, I know Turkey would buy buy since France recognise the Armenian genocide it's not going to happen also since the Turkish design is finalised with Spain

I say sell then to Brazil or India
How would a couple, or even a quartet, of Russian Mistrals be a threat to France or any other country? The European NATO countries spend much more on defense than Russia and China together. And US spend a multitude of the sum of defense spends the European NATO countries.
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
December 12, 2014. TASS TV. Russia. The second Project 22350 frigate, the "Admiral Kasatonov", was set afloat at the Northern Wharf in Russia's northern capital of St. Petersburg.
[video=youtube;RT1kohxcA7c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RT1kohxcA7c[/video]



I will now get back to bottling my Malbec
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Severodvinsk, Zvezdochka shipyard
[video=youtube;MlPducZTpL4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MlPducZTpL4[/video]



I will now get back to bottling my Malbec
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
How would a couple, or even a quartet, of Russian Mistrals be a threat to France or any other country?
The Russians are now building up their surface fleet rapidly.

The Vladivostok (Mistral) Class Amphibious assault vessels were designed to project Russian Marine/Army power to foreign shores with both amphibious and air assault, supported by attack helciopters from the vessel itself. That's their principle use.

In the Baltic, the Black Sea, or for that matter anywhere else these vessels could be escorted, supported, and defended by other Russian naval and air assets, these vessels would pose a threat.

The Russian admiralty boasted about the utility of these vessels before the Ukrainian crisis...indicating that in Gerogia he wished he had had them because it would have made a week long effort on his part something he could have used to defeat the Georgians in 40 minutes.

They have also said that this deal for these Mistral variants would advance what they could have tried to do themselves by ten years.

Make no mistake...such vessels will give Russia a much better amphibious capability than they have ever had before. Such a capability could be a threat anytime it was used...and the Russians are smart enough to figure out a time and place to use them...if they feel have to...where the threat against them would either be minimized or mitigated by the use of subterfuge, surprize, or the applications of their own forces at a time and place of their choosing.

As I understand it, the plan was for the first two to be assembled in Fracne (with the after section having been built in Russia), with a follow-on of two more where they would be entriely constructed in Russia. Clearly Russia has seen a need for these types of weapons although some people question if they have a well thought-out, long term strategy to best employ this type of capability.

I personally give them more credit than that. If they reached a point where they purchased them and were ready to bring them into the fleet, then I have to believe that they had thought about it in detail, and had a long term plan for their implementaion and use.

They know what they are doing.

It seems now that they will have to recoup their money through litigation on the international level (which will probably take them ten or more years), and make the best use that they can of the technology and knowledge they already gained in the process.

One thing to note is that the Russians recently launched a much improved LSD Type Amphibious Assault vessel, the new Ivan Gren, which will displace 6,000 tons fully loaded and are meant to be able to transport up to 100 main battle tanks, are a large number of troops, to shore.

However, it only has a small well deck and is more of a bow-door design and therefore not capable of significant over the horizon amphibious assault, though it does have a decent helo landing deck and hanger on the stern of the vessel which would allow limited air assault.

The Russians launched this one, another is well along in construction, and they plan a total of six of them


15736866122_604905d4a6_b.jpg

15549445069_46efc4037f_b.jpg

15711609246_a86a29d786_b.jpg


One of the Vladivostok class accompanied by two of these vessels would have the makings of a decent ARG for the Russians.
 
Top