Re: Georgia Attacks South Ossetia, War With Russia Looms
another interesting article:
Georgia Strikes Back With Air Defenses
Aug 11, 2008
By David A. Fulghum and Douglas Barrie
If possible, I'd like to ask everyone to post source for their articles. There's too much misinformation being passed around.
=======
The huge, unspoken concern in the Georgia-Russia conflict has been oil. Early reports contend that pipelines running through Tbilisi from the Caspian Sea oil fields were unsuccessfully targeted by the Russian air force which has employed front-line Tu-22M3 bombers in the conflict.
The stout Georgian air defenses, one of the few effective elements of their military, have shot down some Russian Su-25s with shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles, say European-based U.S. officials. The heavier SA-11 Buk-M1 also appears to have contributed to the Frogfoot strike fighter losses and was certainly the cause of the Backfire bomber’s loss, say U.S.-based analysts.
In the past few years, Russia has used the cutoff of oil exports to punish Latvia and Estonia. Intercepting or damaging the Georgians' pipelines would be a heavy blow. But just the insecurity to oil supplies that fighting in the region has brought could do even greater harm both to Georgia and the West if investors chose to play it safe and buy oil through more secure venues.
At least one of the pipelines is also near the line of farthest advance by the Russian Army between Gori and Tbilisi. The three major pipelines that go through Georgia offer direct economic competition to Russian pipelines. However, Georgian officials thought the pipelines would buy them political and economic stability and the support of the West whose economies are being battered by high oil prices.
The World Bank-financed oil pipelines connect the Azer-Chirag-Gunehli oil fields in the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan’s Sangachal Terminal with seaport oil terminals in Supsa, Georgia on the Black Sea and Ceyhan, Turkey on the Mediterranean.
With reporting by Frank Morring and Robert Wall.
==========
Regardless of Russian AF losses, the match up is lopsided. Russia can afford the losses and easily replace them, versus Georgia cannot. Whatever hardware that Georgia loses, that's it.
I've heard reports that the Russians deployed T-80 MBT's. But so far I've only seen upgraded T-72's from both sides. It's also interesting to note that the T-72's all had ERA upgrades but were penetrated and destroyed anyway. I suspect actual tank vs. tank battles were few (urban environment), and most of the MBT kills were from RPG's and ATGM's.
"Regime change"
Renewed Georgian political turmoil was apparent only hours after the Russian ceasefire went into effect, with widespread Georgian media reports that Nino Burjanadze, a former prime minister recently fallen out with Saakashvili, broadly hinting she intended to challenge him sooner rather than later.
'This is not the time to make political attacks ... with Russian tanks only a few kilometres from our capital,' she said. 'There will be time for determining responsibility and guilt later on.'
A new Georgian political party led by Boujanadze appeared to be forming and would be announced officially in coming weeks, Georgian political observers said.
My prediction: Saakashvili will be taken down from within by vultures.