PLAN Type 035/039/091/092 Submarine Thread

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Here's the full Jane's article posted by Xinhui at SDF.


Mystery Chinese SSK fuels Asia's submarine race

Ted Parsons JDW Correspondent - Washington, DC

The China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation has launched an unidentified new-type conventional submarine (SSK) at its Wuhan shipyard, according to Chinese reports on 9 September.

It is the third new SSK design revealed by China since 1994 and is likely to exacerbate regional anxieties that are propelling many Asian states to increase or establish submarine fleets.

Vague or altered internet images of this new SSK, which first appeared on the popular Chinese CALF web page on 10 September, led observers to think that it may be yet another Chinese internet hoax, but the submarine's existence was confirmed by much clearer images on 13 September.

While not much larger than the 3,000- to 4,000-ton Type 041 Yuan class, the new boat appears to incorporate Russian design influences, including a stouter hull with a reduced aft taper similar to the Project 667 Lada/Amur class, plus an elongated sail and hull-mounted retractable hydroplanes similar to the Project 636 'Kilo' class. However, in contrast to the sail of the 'Kilo', the new Chinese SSK incorporates hydrodynamic elements such as an intricately-faired leading edge with concave and convex curves.

While there remains a possibility that China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has engaged Russia's Rubin submarine design bureau to aid future submarine designs during previous encounters, Rubin representatives, while ready to confirm their willingness to sell new submarines to China, have refused to comment on possible co-operation with China. From late 1994 to 2006, the PLAN took delivery of eight Project 636 boats and four of the older Project 877 design Rubin-designed 'Kilo'-class SSKs.

Beyond what can be seen from the initial images, not much else is known about the size, features, main mission or capabilities of this new SSK. There is ample speculation on Chinese websites that the larger sail may house anti-ship cruise missiles, anti-aircraft missiles or a new crew-rescue capsule. At the 2008 Zhuhai Airshow the China Aerospace Science and Industries Corporation revealed its C-705: a new smaller anti-ship cruise missile that could fit in the sail of this new SSK. There is also speculation that the new SSK uses a new double-hull design to improve combat survivability.

The Yuan-class is reported to use a new air-independent propulsion (AIP) system based on the concept of the Swedish Stirling engine, and it is known that Chinese naval research institutes have been investigating fuel cell and exhaust recycling AIP designs similar to the French MESMA (Module d'Energie Sous-Marine Autonome), so this new SSK may well utilise some form of AIP. There is also speculation that it may use a new propulsor pump, but this is considered unlikely as it would not be optimal for a slow-speed patrol profile. Early images of the aft area of the new SSK do not reveal a towed-array housing above the waterline, so it cannot be concluded that the new boat may have a greater anti-submarine capability.

Already China's growing submarine fleet is prompting regional reactions. China launched 13 Type 039 Song-class SSKs from 1994 to 2004 and, in addition to the 12 Russian-sourced 'Kilos' now in service, the US Department of Defense expects the PLAN will build up to 15 Yuan-class SSKs; five had been launched by mid-2010. In July it was revealed that Japan would revise its Defense Guidelines to allow for an increase from 16 to 20 submarines. However, some Japanese sources have told Jane's that a submarine life extension is being considered to allow this fleet to increase up to 25.

In addition to its nine licence-produced German Type 209/1200 SSKs, South Korea plans to build nine KSS-2 (licence-produced Type 214) SSKs by 2020, after which it may build up to six KSS-3 follow on SSKs. In late 2009 Vietnam completed a deal to purchase six 'Kilo' Project 636 SSKs with expected delivery between 2013 and 2019. Australia's Sea 1000 programme aims to replace its current six Collins-class submarines with 12 new SSKs starting in 2025. In 2005 Singapore purchased two AIP-equipped Archer-class (Västergötland) SSKs from Sweden, the first of which was completed in 2009. This year Malaysia has taken delivery of the second of two French and Spanish-built Scorpene-class SSKs while Indonesia is planning to acquire submarines by the end of the decade. While proposed for sale by the United States in 2001, Taiwan and the US have yet to finalise a programme by which Taiwan can acquire up to eight new SSKs.
 

tphuang

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

one new photo of the 039B. Have seen photo in this angle, but not exactly like this one. Not much new here, I'm sure it's going to be sitting dockside for a while.
 

Attachments

  • 039B-Sep23.jpg
    039B-Sep23.jpg
    57.9 KB · Views: 118

Gallaghan36

Banned Idiot
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Japan and South Korea's sub fleet is also growing(as well as US Navy deployments in East Asia), so i suggest China should have 48 modern AIP SSKs and 18 SSNs equal to USN's Virginia-class by the year 2030.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Japan and South Korea's sub fleet is also growing(as well as US Navy deployments in East Asia), so i suggest China should have 48 modern AIP SSKs and 18 SSNs equal to USN's Virginia-class by the year 2030.

that target would be achieved easily .. I think by 2030 .. all conventional subs would be advanced version AIP. 18 modern AIP subs for each fleet (56 subs) plus 12 AIP subs in foreign port (Gwadar, perhaps Sri Lanka and Myanmar, etc). 4 SSN (097 ?) for each fleet and 2x3 SSN to escort 2 carriers and 3 SSNs in Pacific
 

A.Man

Major
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Japan and South Korea's sub fleet is also growing(as well as US Navy deployments in East Asia), so i suggest China should have 48 modern AIP SSKs and 18 SSNs equal to USN's Virginia-class by the year 2030.

Young Man, the greatest defence is to break up the defence line of Japan, South Korea and United States. If we are going to fight them together, no matter what we have-we will be defeated. Why did we always push the United States to the other sides? Can we also pull Taiwan to our side with their US built F-16's & ships? We fought with Vietnam many times over the centuries. The United States flatted the land of Vietnam. Why should we let the United States use Vietnam to fight us?

要用“不战而屈人之兵”。
 
Last edited:

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

that target would be achieved easily .. I think by 2030 .. all conventional subs would be advanced version AIP. 18 modern AIP subs for each fleet (56 subs) plus 12 AIP subs in foreign port (Gwadar, perhaps Sri Lanka and Myanmar, etc). 4 SSN (097 ?) for each fleet and 2x3 SSN to escort 2 carriers and 3 SSNs in Pacific
Heh let's not get too ahead of ourselves...

While it'd be prudent to get as many new (and capable) SSNs and SSKs as soon as possible, we don't want China to do a Soviet Union.

Though I believe by 2030 at least a good number of 095's will be in service, if we're assuming the first of the classed will be commisioned some time this decade.
.... IF there's an 095 class under development at all.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

Heh let's not get too ahead of ourselves...

While it'd be prudent to get as many new (and capable) SSNs and SSKs as soon as possible, we don't want China to do a Soviet Union.

Though I believe by 2030 at least a good number of 095's will be in service, if we're assuming the first of the classed will be commisioned some time this decade.
.... IF there's an 095 class under development at all.

oh well 2030 is 20 years from now .... can you imagine how strong China in 2030 ? .... I mean technologically and militarily ( no question about economic strength !)
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: PLAN submarines Thread II

oh well 2030 is 20 years from now .... can you imagine how strong China in 2030 ? .... I mean technologically and militarily ( no question about economic strength !)
Best to be safe I think -- even by 2030 I wouldn't be confident China can match the US in producing high tech weaponry indigenously.
I mean China can't even produce a decent helicopter at the moment; in twenty years I don't even want to think what kind of weapons the US will have.
 
Top