PLAN Carrier Strike Group and Airwing
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread
Honestly this is the most practical ski-jump design I've seent yet!
Excellent "starter" CV. Excellent
Plently of room on deck for movement and spotting(parking) of aircraft. Deck-edge elevators. The weapons are placed on sponsons!
I would like to know the demensions and air wing make up.
With your permision I'm going to post this in a yahoo Cv group.
Honestly this is the most practical ski-jump design I've seent yet!
Excellent "starter" CV. ExcellentPlently of room on deck for movement and spotting(parking) of aircraft. Deck-edge elevators. The weapons are placed on sponsons!
I would like to know the demensions and air wing make up.
With your permision I'm going to post this in a yahoo Cv group.
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread
Honestly this is the most practical ski-jump design I've seent yet! Excellent "starter" CV. Excellent
Plently of room on deck for movement and spotting(parking) of aircraft. Deck-edge elevators. The weapons are placed on sponsons!
I would like to know the demensions and air wing make up.
With your permision I'm going to post this in a yahoo Cv group.
Honestly this is the most practical ski-jump design I've seent yet!
Excellent "starter" CV. ExcellentPlently of room on deck for movement and spotting(parking) of aircraft. Deck-edge elevators. The weapons are placed on sponsons!
I would like to know the demensions and air wing make up.
With your permision I'm going to post this in a yahoo Cv group.
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread
Honestly this is the most practical ski-jump design I've seent yet! Excellent "starter" CV. Excellent
Plently of room on deck for movement and spotting(parking) of aircraft. Deck-edge elevators. The weapons are placed on sponsons!
I would like to know the demensions and air wing make up.
With your permision I'm going to post this in a yahoo Cv group.
Honestly this is the most practical ski-jump design I've seent yet!
Excellent "starter" CV. ExcellentPlently of room on deck for movement and spotting(parking) of aircraft. Deck-edge elevators. The weapons are placed on sponsons!
I would like to know the demensions and air wing make up.
With your permision I'm going to post this in a yahoo Cv group.
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread
Well this is my design from post #64 with very minor alterations.
It's still 300m long. As I already said, the side length of one square in the left pic is 10m. Note, this is a waterline model, so it shows nothing of the hull that's below the surface.
There's really much space on the deck for a sky-jump (i.e. in comparisson to Kuznetsov). I don't really know why exactly. Perhaps my sky-jump is too short and therefore the radius too small, loading too many Gs on the gear during take-off. The deck is a bid wider on the front than on Kuznetsov and the island is smaller.
I can't really say what would be a fitting air-wing here, since I've no experiance in that. You might have a better idea, estimating from this pics and the cutaway pic in my post #64.
Perhaps 12 naval J-11 and 24 naval J-10, or vice veresa. 6 naval J-11 for tanker and recce. 4 AEW, i.e. KJ-2000. 6-8 Ka-28 ASW helicopter. 4Z-9 for gen.-purpose.
If you really like it that much, put it forward in a yahoo group. Maybe it'll show up somewhere as an actual future PLAN design.
Well this is my design from post #64 with very minor alterations.
It's still 300m long. As I already said, the side length of one square in the left pic is 10m. Note, this is a waterline model, so it shows nothing of the hull that's below the surface.
There's really much space on the deck for a sky-jump (i.e. in comparisson to Kuznetsov). I don't really know why exactly. Perhaps my sky-jump is too short and therefore the radius too small, loading too many Gs on the gear during take-off. The deck is a bid wider on the front than on Kuznetsov and the island is smaller.
I can't really say what would be a fitting air-wing here, since I've no experiance in that. You might have a better idea, estimating from this pics and the cutaway pic in my post #64.
Perhaps 12 naval J-11 and 24 naval J-10, or vice veresa. 6 naval J-11 for tanker and recce. 4 AEW, i.e. KJ-2000. 6-8 Ka-28 ASW helicopter. 4Z-9 for gen.-purpose.
If you really like it that much, put it forward in a yahoo group. Maybe it'll show up somewhere as an actual future PLAN design.
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread
Well this is my design from post #64 with very minor alterations.
It's still 300m long. As I already said, the side length of one square in the left pic is 10m. Note, this is a waterline model, so it shows nothing of the hull that's below the surface.
There's really much space on the deck for a sky-jump (i.e. in comparisson to Kuznetsov). I don't really know why exactly. Perhaps my sky-jump is too short and therefore the radius too small, loading too many Gs on the gear during take-off. The deck is a bid wider on the front than on Kuznetsov and the island is smaller.
I can't really say what would be a fitting air-wing here, since I've no experiance in that. You might have a better idea, estimating from this pics and the cutaway pic in my post #64.
Perhaps 12 naval J-11 and 24 naval J-10, or vice veresa. 6 naval J-11 for tanker and recce. 4 AEW, i.e. KJ-2000. 6-8 Ka-28 ASW helicopter. 4Z-9 for gen.-purpose.
If you really like it that much, put it forward in a yahoo group. Maybe it'll show up somewhere as an actual future PLAN design.
Well this is my design from post #64 with very minor alterations.
It's still 300m long. As I already said, the side length of one square in the left pic is 10m. Note, this is a waterline model, so it shows nothing of the hull that's below the surface.
There's really much space on the deck for a sky-jump (i.e. in comparisson to Kuznetsov). I don't really know why exactly. Perhaps my sky-jump is too short and therefore the radius too small, loading too many Gs on the gear during take-off. The deck is a bid wider on the front than on Kuznetsov and the island is smaller.
I can't really say what would be a fitting air-wing here, since I've no experiance in that. You might have a better idea, estimating from this pics and the cutaway pic in my post #64.
Perhaps 12 naval J-11 and 24 naval J-10, or vice veresa. 6 naval J-11 for tanker and recce. 4 AEW, i.e. KJ-2000. 6-8 Ka-28 ASW helicopter. 4Z-9 for gen.-purpose.
If you really like it that much, put it forward in a yahoo group. Maybe it'll show up somewhere as an actual future PLAN design.
Re: Ideal chinese carrier thread
Well this is my design from post #64 with very minor alterations.
It's still 300m long. As I already said, the side length of one square in the left pic is 10m. Note, this is a waterline model, so it shows nothing of the hull that's below the surface.
There's really much space on the deck for a sky-jump (i.e. in comparisson to Kuznetsov). I don't really know why exactly. Perhaps my sky-jump is too short and therefore the radius too small, loading too many Gs on the gear during take-off. The deck is a bid wider on the front than on Kuznetsov and the island is smaller.
I can't really say what would be a fitting air-wing here, since I've no experiance in that. You might have a better idea, estimating from this pics and the cutaway pic in my post #64.
Perhaps 12 naval J-11 and 24 naval J-10, or vice veresa. 6 naval J-11 for tanker and recce. 4 AEW, i.e. KJ-2000. 6-8 Ka-28 ASW helicopter. 4Z-9 for gen.-purpose.
If you really like it that much, put it forward in a yahoo group. Maybe it'll show up somewhere as an actual future PLAN design.
Well this is my design from post #64 with very minor alterations.
It's still 300m long. As I already said, the side length of one square in the left pic is 10m. Note, this is a waterline model, so it shows nothing of the hull that's below the surface.
There's really much space on the deck for a sky-jump (i.e. in comparisson to Kuznetsov). I don't really know why exactly. Perhaps my sky-jump is too short and therefore the radius too small, loading too many Gs on the gear during take-off. The deck is a bid wider on the front than on Kuznetsov and the island is smaller.
I can't really say what would be a fitting air-wing here, since I've no experiance in that. You might have a better idea, estimating from this pics and the cutaway pic in my post #64.
Perhaps 12 naval J-11 and 24 naval J-10, or vice veresa. 6 naval J-11 for tanker and recce. 4 AEW, i.e. KJ-2000. 6-8 Ka-28 ASW helicopter. 4Z-9 for gen.-purpose.
If you really like it that much, put it forward in a yahoo group. Maybe it'll show up somewhere as an actual future PLAN design.