PLAN Aircraft Carrier programme...(Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Spent over half my adult life out there on aircraft carriers. That pic is a combination of a slight chop and CV-16's forward speed. Liaoning flight deck is closer to the water than a US supercarrier's is (I'll let one of supposed experts look that up) so its going to look a bit more dramatic. I have been out to sea on a super carrier and when green water comes over the flight deck it is no fun. No fun for the Liaoning either, but the comparisons are like apples to oranges.

Thank you jack, we appreciate your insight, that is what makes this forum so outstanding, when we have posters who have "been there, and done that", its been an education and a pleasure hearing from you old "sea dogs". brat
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I have been out to sea on a super carrier and when green water comes over the flight deck it is no fun.
Agreed 100%.

I have always felt that the following is the best video of a US Carrier (in this case the Kitty Hawk) transiting rough seas.


[video=youtube;P1VffVPML6M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1VffVPML6M[/video]

Now those are some very large swells.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Spent over half my adult life out there on aircraft carriers. That pic is a combination of a slight chop and CV-16's forward speed. Liaoning flight deck is closer to the water than a US supercarrier's is (I'll let one of supposed experts look that up) so its going to look a bit more dramatic. I have been out to sea on a super carrier and when green water comes over the flight deck it is no fun. No fun for the Liaoning either, but the comparisons are like apples to oranges.

The heaviest sea I ever encountered was aboard the JFK crossing the Atlantic in late September or early October 1972 after participating in NATO exercise
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
coupled with a 10 month MED cruise. I remember walking in the hangar and waves pounding against the hangar doors. I never got sea sick but plenty of shipmates did.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
[video=youtube;vNoSN_SZRjk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNoSN_SZRjk[/video]

outstanding escobar, lots of business like and ship shape activities, though I did think the think the young Chines dude in the Yellow reminded me of the minions on "despicable me", one of my new favorite movies. and its more than obvious that President Xi commands respect, he may be tough, but he is obviously very pleased with the Liaoning, and the aircrew, nice for service people to have that kind of leadership... looking good here people. brat
 

Franklin

Captain
The lack of a catapult is really a limitation for the Liaoning. I never seen a Flanker take off from her deck with more than 4 ordinance. Two small rockets on the side (PL-5?) and 2 PL-12 or 2 small bombs. For air to air missions the Flankers should take off with at least 6 to 8 AAM missile's and for anti shipping missions it should take off with at least 2 YJ-83 missile's and 2 AAM missile's for self protection. The YJ-83 load are heavier so i expect those planes to take off from the back position and with 6 to 8 AAM missile's they should be able to take off from the front. That we haven't seen it happen in the few seconds of videos it doesn't mean it didn't happen or that they can't. But it will be nice to have some confirmation that they can.

The Russian videos are no better as they usually show them take off with just 2 AAM missile's from the Admiral Kuznetsov. Once again based on that few seconds of video is hard to judge their real capabilities. I have seen a video with the MiG-29K take off with a quite a heavy load from the INS Vikramaditya.
 
Last edited:

volleyballer

Banned Idiot
The lack of a catapult is really a limitation for the Liaoning. I never seen a Flanker take off from her deck with more than 4 ordinance. Two small rockets on the side (PL-5?) and 2 PL-12 or 2 small bombs. For air to air missions the Flankers should take off with at least 6 to 8 AAM missile's and for anti shipping missions it should take off with at least 2 YJ-83 missile's and 2 AAM missile's for self protection. The YJ-83 load are heavier so i expect those planes to take off from the back position and with 6 to 8 AAM missile's they should be able to take off from the front. That we haven't seen it happen in the few seconds of videos it doesn't mean it didn't happen or that they can't. But it will be nice to have some conformation that they can.

The Russian videos are no better they usually just show them taking off with 2 AAM missile's from the Admiral Kuznetsov. Once again based on that few seconds of video is hard to judge their real capabilities. I have seen a video with the MiG-29K take off with a quite a heavy load from the INS Vikramaditya.

According to pb19980515 on CJDBY:

歼15 9吨内油还可以挂5吨弹药。 对海 鹰击83K 5枚 两格斗弹 3.7吨左右。 对地 500公斤激光制导炸弹6枚或者憋版JDMA或者KD88A 两枚格斗弹 3.5吨 空战8枚PL12C加4枚PL10 3吨。这些是195米起飞点挂载能力。

1 . 2 号起飞点 7.5吨内油 6枚霹雳12C 4枚霹雳10 2吨多一点。。。。。

这是飞出来的数据。


至于9吨内油 5吨弹药挂载,只飞了两三次。。。具体什么挂载 先不说了

Translation:

The J-15 can carry 9 tons of internal fuel with 5 tons of ordnance.

- Anti-Shipping: 5 x YJ-83K, 2 x AAM (PL-8?) (Approx. 3.7 tons load-out)
- Anti-Surface: 6 x 500 KG LGB or JDMA or KD88A, 2 x AAM (Approx. 3.5 tons load-out)
- Air-to-Air: 8 x PL12C, 4 x PL-10 (Approx. 3 tons load-out)

From the secondary launch position the J-15 can carry 7.5 tons of internal fuel, 6 x PL-12C, 4 x PL-10. This is the carrying ability from the 195M launch position.

These were the data gathered from flight testing.

As for the 9 ton fuel + 5 ton ordnance load-out, it only flew 2~3 times. The specifics of what it was carrying we won't talk about for now.

--- End translation ---

This poster also said later that with the 9 ton fuel load-out, the J-15 remained flat at 60M above surface for 300M after take-off. He identifies himself as a member of the data-collection team that's on-board the Liaoning during some of the trials, including the recent SCS deployment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top