PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Reminds me of this, without the political legitimacy:

800px-North_and_South_Korea_at_night.jpg
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
My favourite response is this:
View attachment 125615
"Next time CCG dares to board, immediately send warships and CGA ships to surround them, otherwise they think Taiwan is made out of plastic and easily bullied"

"But their ship is 92m long..."
I honestly have no idea what 92m long is relative to other Chinese coast guard ships.
The 92m long came from this news

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
1708425003811.png

China Coast Guard 14608
1708425024899.jpeg
1708425432574.jpeg
Approximately 1500 tons?
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Chinese coast guards continued to patrol in supposed Kinmen waters today.
I checked the paths today and oof:
Screenshot 2024-02-20 213009.jpg
3 days into the operation and they're just about beaching their ships on Kinmen now.

50466893ly1hn02nxb8x9j20oa0drwl2.jpg
8029 got within 0.57nm of land and stayed within Kinmen "territorial water" for 65 minutes ignoring radio call from ROCCGA asking them to leave. There's much weeping and gnashing of teeth over the other side of the strait:

0064BRSPly1hn00refs54j30q00jhwn8.jpg
0064BRSPly1hn00roklwpj30ir0bojup.jpg
0064BRSPly1hn01f8awtfj30v90neafs.jpg
Note on this occasion 8029 is a China Marine Surveillance ship and not China Coast Guard.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Please avoid paternalism when taking.

Air defence has different modes, how do you think is that Ukraine make ambushes to Russian planes with a Patriot of other means?

If the radars would be active the planes would see the anti aircraft system in its own radar.

The procedure is to use the radar in passive mode to avoid emitting signal and only activate it when you are going to shot, in order to direct the missile to the target.
This is the fire control you talk about.

When you know the target plane is close, and this is mainly visual, you activate radar and shot.

The ISR is mainly use to analysw the common routes of planes and place there the air defence for the trap

Please don’t get angry at others for pointing out your very obvious lack of knowledge and understanding of the subject at hand.

What you are describing is very entry-level understanding of anti-air vs SEAD/DEAD tactics based on fundamentally flawed assumptions and ideas.

Go to your closet airport and see at what distance you can positively identify commercial airliners on low level landing approaches and you will realise just how ridiculous your idea of relying on visual searching for modern air defence is. The opfor will need to be dropping iron bombs directly on your SAM site for visual searching to have any chance. Even cheap glider bombs would render your visual searching strategy irrelevant as good luck trying to spot even a bomber sized target 20km away at cruising altitude using your mk1 eyeball from the ground.

And unlike the Russians, the Chinese have been investing heavily in its support assets and toys. Any manned strike package going over Taiwan island itself will have dedicated Wild Weasel escorts.

That means even if my some minor miracle you did visually spot a strike package coming in, as soon as your radar lights up, it’s going to be the focus of multiple dedicated jammers with anti-radiation missiles incoming on your position very shortly afterwards.

That’s not to say it’s impossible to get a kill, just incredibly unlikely and expensive to do so. Since unlike the Russians, the Chinese will have true air dominance over Taiwan. Meaning any pot shots taken will attract massive and near immediate strike responses, so you are almost certainly going to loose the radar and launcher(s) that just engaged.

But the more likely scenario is that the PLA won’t even really heed to send in manned aircraft to over fly Taiwan island since they can easily strike at any point on the island from standoff ranges. Instead it’s massed drones that will be deployed to do the bulk of the search and strike missions, with manned aircraft acting as rapid response to deal with any unexpected events.

So in your example, the only things you can realistically spot would be drones, and if you light up to engage them, you can expect to be engaged yourself by manned and unmanned platforms long before you can pack up and scoot. If you don’t engage the enemy drones overhead, it’s very likely they will spot your hidden battery and shoot missiles at you anyways.

In a Taiwan scenario, the outcome will never be in doubt, the only question is how much it will cost the PLA.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The two survivors returned to mainland today. The families of the victims saw their deceased loved ones and their bodies were cremated on Kinmen.
I was wrong previously

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The family of the deceased refuse to have the bodies cremated.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Taiwan claim there was "physical contact" between the boats but there is no footage.
Looks like this tragedy isn't dying down anytime soon.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
In light of recent tensions, Kinmen legislator is calling for (ROC) central government to grant Kinmen and Matsu powers to directly negotiate with mainland regarding fishery rights and economic matters, independent of ROC central government.

Now that’s the sort of Taiwan Independence I can get behind.
 

Santamaria

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please don’t get angry at others for pointing out your very obvious lack of knowledge and understanding of the subject at hand.

What you are describing is very entry-level understanding of anti-air vs SEAD/DEAD tactics based on fundamentally flawed assumptions and ideas.

Go to your closet airport and see at what distance you can positively identify commercial airliners on low level landing approaches and you will realise just how ridiculous your idea of relying on visual searching for modern air defence is. The opfor will need to be dropping iron bombs directly on your SAM site for visual searching to have any chance. Even cheap glider bombs would render your visual searching strategy irrelevant as good luck trying to spot even a bomber sized target 20km away at cruising altitude using your mk1 eyeball from the ground.

And unlike the Russians, the Chinese have been investing heavily in its support assets and toys. Any manned strike package going over Taiwan island itself will have dedicated Wild Weasel escorts.

That means even if my some minor miracle you did visually spot a strike package coming in, as soon as your radar lights up, it’s going to be the focus of multiple dedicated jammers with anti-radiation missiles incoming on your position very shortly afterwards.

That’s not to say it’s impossible to get a kill, just incredibly unlikely and expensive to do so. Since unlike the Russians, the Chinese will have true air dominance over Taiwan. Meaning any pot shots taken will attract massive and near immediate strike responses, so you are almost certainly going to loose the radar and launcher(s) that just engaged.

But the more likely scenario is that the PLA won’t even really heed to send in manned aircraft to over fly Taiwan island since they can easily strike at any point on the island from standoff ranges. Instead it’s massed drones that will be deployed to do the bulk of the search and strike missions, with manned aircraft acting as rapid response to deal with any unexpected events.

So in your example, the only things you can realistically spot would be drones, and if you light up to engage them, you can expect to be engaged yourself by manned and unmanned platforms long before you can pack up and scoot. If you don’t engage the enemy drones overhead, it’s very likely they will spot your hidden battery and shoot missiles at you anyways.

In a Taiwan scenario, the outcome will never be in doubt, the only question is how much it will cost the PLA.
I don't pretend to be expert and I am happy to accept critic to my comments. But the expression we don't live in time of WWII was paternalistic.

On the other hand, the situation I have described has really happened in the Ukranian war. Air defenses operating in passive mode to remain hidden until a plane shows up.

As crazy as it may look there were actual reports of how in the cloudy days russians aircraft could be more active due to Ukranians unable to spot them

And specially before the introduction of the glide bombs by Russia, its planes needed to fly low to drop bombs with some precision so it was even easier to spot them.

However, I totally accept the point that Taiwan size is much smaller than Ukraine, and it is an island. So for chinese planes will be much easier.

It was simply a comment of the kind of strategy that taiwanese will employ. Their objective will not be to win, or even maximize survival but to inflict as much damage to chinese air force and army

I also myself want to apologise, that please don’t be paternalistic was aggressive.
Anyway level of comments here is very high, I am happy to interact and read you!!
 
Last edited:

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
You just gotta give it to at least some of them for trying to cure their *ahem* on their own:

View attachment 125632



B1tch, we already done that N years ago with the PLA:

View attachment 125633

The 9th wasn’t too impressed with their daddy when they did the 6 vs 1 gangbang thing.

Yes. They scrambled six J-20s to gangbang the intruder from multiple directions. Poor bloke turned tails and ran. Really shocking how well integrated KJ-500/Ground based radar is with fighter aircraft and how capable the J-20 is in terms of readiness.
1708441205361.jpeg
 
Top