PLA Strategy in a Taiwan Contingency

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
As @ACuriousPLAFan said, it is important to fully demilitarize and denazify Japan. Many Japanese fascists were allowed to walk free, become leaders and build temples to their war criminals.

It would be as if the allies allowed Himmler to rule Germany after WW2 if he renames the Nazi Party to Happy Democratic Sunshine Party, and instead of apologizing to the victims, he decided to build a Goering Cathedral.
Can you list some of these temples? I am curious now.
 

Alabama

New Member
Registered Member
So this analysis of 2030 projections will be as favourable as possible towards the US to see a worst case scenario against the PLA. I am using desert shield as a point of analysis to see how much they can surge (important to note the US won't have 6 months of forewarning).

Air force (USN & USAF)

This is across both all bases and CVNs. So assuming there is a 2/3 readiness rate and the US has (optimistically) by this time 1150 5th gen jets. Assuming they can fit 90 planes per CVN (I'm unsure how a 5th gen jet affects this) and 11 CVNs I will round up and aussume 7 cvns * 80 planes = 560 planes. In addition adding the rest of the 5th gen fleet with a highly optimistic 75% availability rate (1150-560=740) 590*0.75 = 423. This totals 1083

Air Force PLAAF

Assuming >500 j20s by 2025 and adding 120 per year would =1100. Assuming J35 production = (very pessimistically ) 30 a year on average this would = 150 by 2030. This totals 1250.
This would mean the PLAAF forces in west pac would be more than 15% greater than the amount US forces can bring. This also doesn't take into account how diverse and spread out PLAAF bases are compared to the US and many many aircraft will be lost by ASBMs on CSGs and H20 sorties with inital missiles slavos on Anderson Guam etcetra.

Navy (USN)

Assuming TICS are retired and they carry on building 2 Burkes a year this would mean maybe 85 burkes. Assuming a very optimistic deployment rate of 0.7 = 60 destroyers in the pacfic. Assuming they deploy their best flight 3s that is around 15 SPY 6s and 45 SPY 1s.

The US as of now has around 36 Virginas/Sea wolf. they are building around 2 per year. That will equal 50 by 2030. Assuming a .7 deployment rate that means there will be 35 in the pacific.

Navy (PLAN)

Assuming this build-up continues this means there will probably be 55+ 052Ds and 24+ 055s. That is probably around 80 destroyers all of which have AESA and the type 346 variants are > the SPY family.

The PLA has started on the type 055. I expect from 2026 2- 6 a year. That would mean there could be from 8-20 in the pacific. This is the only place where the US outnumbers the PLA . However when you addition up the SW corvette various sensor shooter fleet its likely the PLA will have superiority in the 1IC and contest in the 2IC.

PLAARF

The US will not possess similar capabilities to he PLAAF to bring down missile fire due to distance and lack of space of bases. Land based ASBM and general TELs and BM forces indicate the Chinese will have a massive long range fires advantage that will splice up US forces even before they make contact. It will be a constant support arm of the PLA attacking US logistics ships planes bases and causing hell.
I'm no expert on anything but I'm seeing some major flaws in this post of yours? Namely your math.

You say assuming 90 aircraft per CVN but then go ahead and multiply 7 CNV by 80 aircraft for a total of 560.
Then there's when you do 1150-560 which is equal to 590 but you incorrectly write 1150-560=740, but then immediately multiply the correct answer of 590 by your 75% readiness rate.
Also 590*0.75 is equal to 442.5 not 423.
And finally 560+423 is 983, not 1083 as you said.

I am extremely confused my your math and how you repeatedly contradict yourself in your own post with these numbers...
It also seems like you forgot to or neglected to provide a readiness rate for the PLAN and PLAAF as you did for the USN and USAF?
I won't question the estimates on future assets as we have no idea what they plan to procure until that time comes.
 

HighGround

Senior Member
Registered Member
Yasukuni shrine is a temple dedicated to war criminals who died invading other countries for Imperial Japan.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Imagine a German cathedral dedicated to the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS who died invading other countries during Nazi Germany.

Yeah, I can see how that would be controversial. Japan doesn't strike my as the type of country to turn back on established tradition and history though, so the only way they'd change is by force.

I'm no expert on anything but I'm seeing some major flaws in this post of yours? Namely your math.

You say assuming 90 aircraft per CVN but then go ahead and multiply 7 CNV by 80 aircraft for a total of 560.
Then there's when you do 1150-560 which is equal to 590 but you incorrectly write 1150-560=740, but then immediately multiply the correct answer of 590 by your 75% readiness rate.
Also 590*0.75 is equal to 442.5 not 423.
And finally 560+423 is 983, not 1083 as you said.

I am extremely confused my your math and how you repeatedly contradict yourself in your own post with these numbers...
It also seems like you forgot to or neglected to provide a readiness rate for the PLAN and PLAAF as you did for the USN and USAF?
I won't question the estimates on future assets as we have no idea what they plan to procure until that time comes.

Math aside, we'd also benefit from ORBAT analysis. Equipment numbers are a good proxy for military power, but ultimately, equipment doesn't fight, units do.
 

Alabama

New Member
Registered Member
Math aside, we'd also benefit from ORBAT analysis. Equipment numbers are a good proxy for military power, but ultimately, equipment doesn't fight, units do.
As for an ORBAT analysis or anything of the sort, we'll have to depend on someone more knowledgable as I have no qualifications for anything like that in any capacity. Consider me captain obvious, I just state the obvious and call out people when they make questionable statements. :p
 

aqh

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm no expert on anything but I'm seeing some major flaws in this post of yours? Namely your math.

You say assuming 90 aircraft per CVN but then go ahead and multiply 7 CNV by 80 aircraft for a total of 560.
Then there's when you do 1150-560 which is equal to 590 but you incorrectly write 1150-560=740, but then immediately multiply the correct answer of 590 by your 75% readiness rate.
Also 590*0.75 is equal to 442.5 not 423.
And finally 560+423 is 983, not 1083 as you said.

I am extremely confused my your math and how you repeatedly contradict yourself in your own post with these numbers...
It also seems like you forgot to or neglected to provide a readiness rate for the PLAN and PLAAF as you did for the USN and USAF?
I won't question the estimates on future assets as we have no idea what they plan to procure until that time comes.
I changed my numbers midway lol. Ignore the calculations.
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
This kind of thinking is dangerous, and will lead to WW3. Even if, and that's a big if, the Chinese were able to project power past Hawaii, it would be only after many years of prolonged conflict and would result in the collective West entering the conflict. The end result would either be MAD or devastation to such unimaginable scales that there would be no real winners. Geographically, any Eurasian military force pushing towards the America's would have a much harder time than the Allies did in WW2. The Allies had Austalia and India as bases in the Pacific and Great Britain, North Africa and the Middle East in the Atlantic to serve as staging grounds and logistics centers. World War level conflict is not an realistic outcome of a Taiwan contingency, there is a separate thread for discussing PLA strike options in a West Pac conflict.
After WW1 the French made a mistake. They fought a massive world war, lost millions of men and suffered great devastation to their lands. And for all that, the only thing they got was a very small and unimportant province. Germany lost very little except for suffering humiliation. Even at the time of the peace treaty people already expected this to be a 20 year armistice.

If you fight a world war, you have to substantially change the balance of power so that you avoid the next war. Of course the WW2 option of occupying the defeated enemy is impossible in the nuclear age. But China can't be satisfied with only taking Taiwan if the US intervenes. If half the American navy is sunk, it would be silly not to take advantage and push further. At the very least, Japan and the Philippines must be removed from the American alliance system.

Of course it would be preferable to take over Taiwan as quickly as possible and avoid a world war. But if you're even considering a war against the US, the victory has to be crushing enough to avoid the next war. That's why I'm against a blockade, Taiwan must be taken in a campaign of a few days
 

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
It's impossible to invade Taiwan without involving Japan. There wouldn't be anywhere for America to base the invasion forces.

China has prepped justification for dealing with Japan. They have begun steps so that they can be ready to restore the Ryukyu state. There is also an old ww2 era mandate giving China power to determine Japanese borders, due to Japan losing the 2nd Sino-Japanese war.

In the 1st phase, China would focus on holding Taiwan. That means flooding the area with naval and air assets, so any incoming fleet will be spotted and engaged. Meanwhile, the Army will conduct operations against the KMT, in order to set up basing for missiles and missile defenses deeper inside the province. The missile forces will clear out operation areas for the Army, while also suppressing US/Japanese bases in tandem with the Air Force.

Once defenses inside Taiwan have been built up to a satisfactory level and the offensive power of the American-Japanese Axis reduced or destroyed, a 2nd phase consisting of a blockade over Japan can be started. Japan is not self sufficient and doesn't have hardened infrastructure, weeks or a few months of blockade, even a softer blockade, will create the right conditions for landings on Ryukyu and Kyushu.

The scenario assumes North and South Korean neutrality, as China doesn't call NK due to fears of further escalation and SK is afraid of devastration.

Russia is assumed to be "neutral" but fly ISR support for China and provide military access, with them potentially joining in later.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Russia's Pacific Fleet is still in the process of renewal. It is way behind the Japanese Navy let alone the US Navy.
Unlike Japan, Russia has to split its Navy to cover its huge coastline which means they have a vast numerical inferiority in the Pacific.
The situation of the Pacific Fleet is expected to improve over the next decade as more Project 20380/5, Project 22800 corvettes, Project 636.3, and Project 885M submarines enter service.
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
Since there is no more information about the Military simulation held by JFSS in 2023, I continue to translate the summary of the contents of the simulation in 2022 by "Two Tailed Comet".
Part of the content comes from Weibo.
75321d4fly8hg1g26ha0hj20lx0knqgg.jpg

List of participants for 2021. The left side indicates the role they played in the simulation. It can be seen that the participants are not civilians, most of whom are politicians and retired generals.
The focus of the simulation is not to determine the direction and outcome of the Taiwan Strait crisis, but to simulate Japan's internal response mechanism to the Taiwan Strait crisis.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The simulation in August 2022 was influenced by the Ukrainian war, making Japan's decisions more extreme and radical.
This part of the video no longer describes the specific process, but focuses on Japanese decision-making.

1、This simulation envisions a conflict breaking out in 2027, and China has established a comprehensive military advantage over the United States, including nuclear weapons.
2、Japan assumed that China would adopt the strategy of "limited nuclear war" and use Tactical nuclear weapon to deter the United States and prevent the war from escalating into a full-scale nuclear war.
3、No longer envisioning "internal problems" in China, and China will have the ability to launch a large-scale public opinion offensive against Japan to trigger anti war within Japan.
4、However, even if the US military loses its advantage and there is a strong anti war sentiment within Japan, the Japanese government still insists on confrontation.
5、Assuming that China will expand the "exercise area" to the Ryukyu Islands, Japan will not shrink, and will be ready for a military confrontation on the Diaoyu Islands.
6、Japan will not participate in US military operations in the South China Sea. They will concentrate all their efforts to defend Japan's homeland and abandon the unrealistic plan of "using force to rescue overseas Japanese". Japan's military forces will be fully concentrated in the East China Sea region.
7、In the 2021 simulation, Japan would passively intervene in conflicts at the request of the Americans, but in 2022, Japan chose to actively intervene. Even without the support of the United States, conflicts around the Diaoyu Islands will be regarded as "aggression against Japan". Japan will require the United States to fulfill its obligations under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan and let the United States participate in the war at all costs.
Japan will send warships to the Diaoyu Islands to proactively escalate the scale of the confrontation.
8、The Taiwan Strait crisis will be seen as a major threat to Japan's survival, and on this basis, Japan will demand maximum assistance from the United States.
9、Japan plans to abrogate(If conflict breaks out) the Japan–China Joint Communiqué of 1972 on the ground that "China undermines the stability of the Taiwan Strait".
10、After the conflict broke out, Japan planned to move the residents of the Ryukyu Islands to Japan's main island.
11、Japan's economy will enter the mobilization mode, stop all foreign aid and issue emergency treasury bond.
12、The United States is required to deploy mid-range missile and nuclear weapons as soon as possible. At the same time, it is up to the Prime Minister to decide whether to abolish the principle of no nuclear weapons.
13、Protect the submarine communications cable leading to Taiwan Island from being cut off, and strengthen domestic security at the same time. If necessary, monitor and control the 790000 Chinese people operating in Japan.
14、Japan will demand that the United States place Taiwan under nuclear protection.

——The anchor believes that the experience of the Ukrainian war indicates that the possibility of Americans being driven into passivity by "allies" exists, and the strong anti Russian sentiment in Eastern Europe allows them to threaten the United States to choose between "aid or loss of credibility" through public opinion and diplomatic pressure. So Japan can also adopt the same approach to force Americans to passively participate in the war.
It can be predicted that Japan's policies in the future will be more radical, and the policy restrictions on JSDF will be lifted to develop and produce Offensive weapon. When facing severe internal social problems, the Japanese government is highly likely to choose military adventures.
 
Top