More like slow bureaucracy + sh1tty interns.
The JL-10 trainer are now powered by WS-15 engines according to the CMPR:
Did noboby proofread this before publishing the report lmfao
PLA (strategic) news, pics, and videos
- Thread starter dxq4412
- Start date
More like slow bureaucracy + sh1tty interns.
The JL-10 trainer are now powered by WS-15 engines according to the CMPR:
Did noboby proofread this before publishing the report lmfao
Beyond the ones posted above and in the other threads, here's a compilation of "What-In-The-Actual-Cr4p-Is-This"s from the CMPR 2024, posted by @Rational 314159 on Twitter. Bracketed phrases in Italic are the actual/correct information/facts.
1. Somehow thinks that there are still two Military Districts (Xinjiang and Tibet) which are independent of the five Theater Commands of the PLA (there are no more PLA military districts after 2015):
2. Believes that the 076 LHD took less than one year from the start of construction to launch (the 076 LHD actually started construction in mid-2023):
3. Believes that 60 of the Type 22 missile boats are for coastal defense (not really):
4. Somehow thinks that the AG600 seaplane is part of China's strategic airlifter fleet (lmao no), and that the Il-76s are still the backbone of the PLAAF strategic airlifter fleet (the Y-20s have already taken over the helm of the fleet for N years):
5. Still thinking that the CR929 project is underway and close to stalling (China is already proceeding on her own through COMAC C929 since mid-2023 at the latest):
6. Listed only three combat aircraft models for export (there are also the JL-9 and JL-10, both of which can be considered light fighters):
7. And last but not least - Whatever the hell this is (the PLAN certainly has more than 42 destroyers even by late-2023, and both the amphibious assault fleet of the PLAN and CCG fleet are way bigger than that of the Wanwanese rebels):
Like, did the US DoD just some mediocre interns who used ChatGPT of the GPT-3.5 version to write this report?
1. Somehow thinks that there are still two Military Districts (Xinjiang and Tibet) which are independent of the five Theater Commands of the PLA (there are no more PLA military districts after 2015):
2. Believes that the 076 LHD took less than one year from the start of construction to launch (the 076 LHD actually started construction in mid-2023):
3. Believes that 60 of the Type 22 missile boats are for coastal defense (not really):
4. Somehow thinks that the AG600 seaplane is part of China's strategic airlifter fleet (lmao no), and that the Il-76s are still the backbone of the PLAAF strategic airlifter fleet (the Y-20s have already taken over the helm of the fleet for N years):
5. Still thinking that the CR929 project is underway and close to stalling (China is already proceeding on her own through COMAC C929 since mid-2023 at the latest):
6. Listed only three combat aircraft models for export (there are also the JL-9 and JL-10, both of which can be considered light fighters):
7. And last but not least - Whatever the hell this is (the PLAN certainly has more than 42 destroyers even by late-2023, and both the amphibious assault fleet of the PLAN and CCG fleet are way bigger than that of the Wanwanese rebels):
Like, did the US DoD just some mediocre interns who used ChatGPT of the GPT-3.5 version to write this report?
Last edited:
Salary thieves everywhere.
People don't seem to be aware of the context and role of this report.
This report in no way strives to be very accurate or revelatory. It's nothing more than a talking points sheet. It doesn't include any intelligence gathered, nor any real analysis of even open source material. It's simply a surface level overview to give a very rough overview to think tanks and politicians. Nothing more and nothing less.
It's in no way interested in giving the exact number of ships or planes, be accurate in the roles of equipment or say in any way anything new. That is something that intelligence reports do not public reports. This is just a help to surrogates frame the PLA in the way the US government wants it to be framed. And for that it's better if things are murky rather than clear.
This report in no way strives to be very accurate or revelatory. It's nothing more than a talking points sheet. It doesn't include any intelligence gathered, nor any real analysis of even open source material. It's simply a surface level overview to give a very rough overview to think tanks and politicians. Nothing more and nothing less.
It's in no way interested in giving the exact number of ships or planes, be accurate in the roles of equipment or say in any way anything new. That is something that intelligence reports do not public reports. This is just a help to surrogates frame the PLA in the way the US government wants it to be framed. And for that it's better if things are murky rather than clear.
A few more funny comments
---
"Almost all major PRC military platforms are produced by PRC SOEs, which lack competition and, thus, have little incentive to improve efficiency or reduce costs"
There's actually real competition between SOEs or their institutes. Examples include Chengdu versus Shenyang for fighter jets, or Dalian versus Jiangnan for naval ships. Contrast these sectors with the privatised monopolies that exist in the US. whose interest is to charge more.
---
"J-10 and J-20 fighters beginning to switch to domestically produced WS-10 engines"
The J-20 is switching to a newer WS-15 now, never mind the WS-10.
---
"Almost all major PRC military platforms are produced by PRC SOEs, which lack competition and, thus, have little incentive to improve efficiency or reduce costs"
There's actually real competition between SOEs or their institutes. Examples include Chengdu versus Shenyang for fighter jets, or Dalian versus Jiangnan for naval ships. Contrast these sectors with the privatised monopolies that exist in the US. whose interest is to charge more.
---
"J-10 and J-20 fighters beginning to switch to domestically produced WS-10 engines"
The J-20 is switching to a newer WS-15 now, never mind the WS-10.
I agree with this point. They tried to adjust the data to make the forces of both sides appear slightly 'balanced'.
They only have one LPD, but these people compare it to 075. Fortunately, they did not provide actual images, otherwise these data games would have been immediately exposed for the truth.
Imagine how powerful China would be if we weren't so "corrupt and inefficient"-just so much copium-do love the white cate being petted.That being said : can China do better YES in every way,-no resting on laurels
Last edited: