PLA (strategic) news, pics, and videos

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
This report is the product of a slow bureaucracy, which means they are lagging way behind the present time. Cutoff was early 2024; they presumably spent the rest of the time drafting and editing and so forth.

More like slow bureaucracy + sh1tty interns.

The JL-10 trainer are now powered by WS-15 engines according to the CMPR:

1000156326.jpg

Did noboby proofread this before publishing the report lmfao
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Beyond the ones posted above and in the other threads, here's a compilation of "What-In-The-Actual-Cr4p-Is-This"s from the CMPR 2024, posted by @Rational 314159 on Twitter. Bracketed phrases in Italic are the actual/correct information/facts.

1. Somehow thinks that there are still two Military Districts (Xinjiang and Tibet) which are independent of the five Theater Commands of the PLA (there are no more PLA military districts after 2015):
GfKkBArbcAAAekq.jpeg

2. Believes that the 076 LHD took less than one year from the start of construction to launch (the 076 LHD actually started construction in mid-2023):
GfKkBAubIAArimJ.jpeg

3. Believes that 60 of the Type 22 missile boats are for coastal defense (not really):
GfKkBAwbsAESFnK.jpeg

4. Somehow thinks that the AG600 seaplane is part of China's strategic airlifter fleet (lmao no), and that the Il-76s are still the backbone of the PLAAF strategic airlifter fleet (the Y-20s have already taken over the helm of the fleet for N years):
GfKkEmPb0AAgcuf.jpeg

5. Still thinking that the CR929 project is underway and close to stalling (China is already proceeding on her own through COMAC C929 since mid-2023 at the latest):
GfKkEmMawAE7Cjs.jpeg

6. Listed only three combat aircraft models for export (there are also the JL-9 and JL-10, both of which can be considered light fighters):
GfKkEmMasAAIWOw.jpeg

7. And last but not least - Whatever the hell this is (the PLAN certainly has more than 42 destroyers even by late-2023, and both the amphibious assault fleet of the PLAN and CCG fleet are way bigger than that of the Wanwanese rebels):
GfKkGFoakAE1qsT.jpeg

Like, did the US DoD just some mediocre interns who used ChatGPT of the GPT-3.5 version to write this report?
 
Last edited:

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
Beyond the ones posted above and in the other threads, here's a compilation of "What-In-The-Actual-Cr4p-Is-This"s from the CMPR 2024, posted by @Rational 314159 on Twitter. Bracketed phrases in Italic are the actual/correct information/facts.

1. Somehow thinks that there are still two Military Districts (Xinjiang and Tibet) which are independent of the five Theater Commands of the PLA (there are no more PLA military districts after 2015):
View attachment 141165

2. Believes that the 076 LHD took less than one year from the start of construction to launch (the 076 LHD actually started construction in mid-2023):
View attachment 141166

3. Believes that 60 of the Type 22 missile boats are for coastal defense (not really):
View attachment 141167

4. Somehow thinks that the AG600 seaplane is part of China's strategic airlifter fleet (lmao no), and that the Il-76s are still the backbone of the PLAAF strategic airlifter fleet (the Y-20s have already taken over the helm of the fleet for N years):
View attachment 141168

5. Still thinking that the CR929 project is underway and close to stalling (China is already proceeding on her own through COMAC C929 since mid-2023 at the latest):
View attachment 141169

6. Listed only three combat aircraft models for export (there are also the JL-9 and JL-10, both of which can be considered light fighters):
View attachment 141170

7. And last but not least - Whatever the hell this is (the PLAN certainly has more than 42 destroyers even by late-2023, and both the amphibious assault fleet of the PLAN and CCG fleet are way bigger than that of the Wanwanese rebels):
View attachment 141171

Like, did the US DoD just some mediocre interns who used ChatGPT of the GPT-3.5 version to write this report?
Salary thieves everywhere.
 

HailingTX20

Just Hatched
Registered Member
People don't seem to be aware of the context and role of this report.

This report in no way strives to be very accurate or revelatory. It's nothing more than a talking points sheet. It doesn't include any intelligence gathered, nor any real analysis of even open source material. It's simply a surface level overview to give a very rough overview to think tanks and politicians. Nothing more and nothing less.

It's in no way interested in giving the exact number of ships or planes, be accurate in the roles of equipment or say in any way anything new. That is something that intelligence reports do not public reports. This is just a help to surrogates frame the PLA in the way the US government wants it to be framed. And for that it's better if things are murky rather than clear.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
A few more funny comments

---
"Almost all major PRC military platforms are produced by PRC SOEs, which lack competition and, thus, have little incentive to improve efficiency or reduce costs"

There's actually real competition between SOEs or their institutes. Examples include Chengdu versus Shenyang for fighter jets, or Dalian versus Jiangnan for naval ships. Contrast these sectors with the privatised monopolies that exist in the US. whose interest is to charge more.

---

"J-10 and J-20 fighters beginning to switch to domestically produced WS-10 engines"

The J-20 is switching to a newer WS-15 now, never mind the WS-10.
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
7. And last but not least - Whatever the hell this is (the PLAN certainly has more than 42 destroyers even by late-2023, and both the amphibious assault fleet of the PLAN and CCG fleet are way bigger than that of the Wanwanese rebels):
It's in no way interested in giving the exact number of ships or planes, be accurate in the roles of equipment or say in any way anything new. That is something that intelligence reports do not public reports. This is just a help to surrogates frame the PLA in the way the US government wants it to be framed. And for that it's better if things are murky rather than clear.
I agree with this point. They tried to adjust the data to make the forces of both sides appear slightly 'balanced'.

They only have one LPD, but these people compare it to 075. Fortunately, they did not provide actual images, otherwise these data games would have been immediately exposed for the truth.
 

supercat

Major

What the Pentagon’s New Report on Chinese Military Power Reveals About Capabilities, Context, and Consequences​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
LGAxb98.gif

UV5bGAV.gif
 

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
A flight of the alleged prototype of the sixth generation fighter took place in China. During the flight, the prototype aircraft was accompanied by the Chinese J-20 fighter. It is worth noting that the sixth generation of aircraft should already be unmanned, according to some aviation experts. Previously, the alleged prototype was shown at an exhibition.
The aircraft does not have its own index yet, the J-XD or J-XD1 indexes were previously used. The prototype aircraft is created according to the "flying wing" scheme and does not have a tail unit. Presumably, the aircraft does not have hydraulics and all control is carried out by electrical equipment. The aircraft is equipped with flat nozzles of three engines.
Based on the size of the aircraft, it can be assumed that the takeoff weight of the aircraft is from 35 to 50 tons, the payload weight in the internal weapons compartments is about 10 tons, and the flight range is about 2,500 kilometers. The aircraft has a very low RCS, as a result of which it will be difficult to detect by radar.

 

Ringsword

Junior Member
Registered Member
A flight of the alleged prototype of the sixth generation fighter took place in China. During the flight, the prototype aircraft was accompanied by the Chinese J-20 fighter. It is worth noting that the sixth generation of aircraft should already be unmanned, according to some aviation experts. Previously, the alleged prototype was shown at an exhibition.
The aircraft does not have its own index yet, the J-XD or J-XD1 indexes were previously used. The prototype aircraft is created according to the "flying wing" scheme and does not have a tail unit. Presumably, the aircraft does not have hydraulics and all control is carried out by electrical equipment. The aircraft is equipped with flat nozzles of three engines.
Based on the size of the aircraft, it can be assumed that the takeoff weight of the aircraft is from 35 to 50 tons, the payload weight in the internal weapons compartments is about 10 tons, and the flight range is about 2,500 kilometers. The aircraft has a very low RCS, as a result of which it will be difficult to detect by radar.

Just a sidenote although I believe vitally important-the wonderful discovery of the giant maybe the world's biggest gold deposit in Hunan.As the Roman Cicero said so succinctly 2000 years ago"The sinews of war is endless money"-this treasure find is making up in a way for the millions of taels of gold and silver given to the west/japs as "war repaparations" during the Century of Humiliation(Boxer /First SinoJap war that built up THEIR nations-maybe Heaven through nature is healing the Chinese land-people and setting things aright.
 
Top