PLA (strategic) news, pics, and videos

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
A major fire broke out on August 16 in China on the Soviet heavy aircraft carrier Minsk of Project 1143.2. The Minsk cruiser was sold to South Korea for scrap in 1995, and was bought by a Chinese company in 1998 and towed to Shenzhen. In 2000, the Minsk cruiser was placed in the Minsk World amusement park, and in 2017, it was towed to Nantong for a new amusement park. During the dismantling of the ship's structure, a fire broke out on it, which intensified on the night of August 17. Perhaps these are the last shots of the Minsk cruiser and its story will end here.

 

Soldier30

Senior Member
Registered Member
China's Skywalker drone with fiber optic control is shown in China. The FPV drone is manufactured by Skywalker Technology Co., Ltd from Wuhan. Depending on the task, the FPV drone can be equipped with reels with different lengths of fiber optic cable. At the moment, the drone can fly at a distance of 1, 5 and 10 km. Due to the use of a reel with a fiber optic cable, the weight of the drone's warhead is reduced, there is no data on it. For example, a reel with a 5 km cable weighs 1.1 kg, therefore a reel with a 10 km cable will weigh about 2 kg. In this configuration, the payload weight of the drone will be about 3 kg, which makes it possible to use the drone only against lightly armored vehicles.

 

pipaster

Junior Member
Registered Member
China's Skywalker drone with fiber optic control is shown in China. The FPV drone is manufactured by Skywalker Technology Co., Ltd from Wuhan. Depending on the task, the FPV drone can be equipped with reels with different lengths of fiber optic cable. At the moment, the drone can fly at a distance of 1, 5 and 10 km. Due to the use of a reel with a fiber optic cable, the weight of the drone's warhead is reduced, there is no data on it. For example, a reel with a 5 km cable weighs 1.1 kg, therefore a reel with a 10 km cable will weigh about 2 kg. In this configuration, the payload weight of the drone will be about 3 kg, which makes it possible to use the drone only against lightly armored vehicles.


Depending on what is considered payload 3kg is sufficient for a PG-7VL RPG 7 round, or approximately an 82mm HE mortar round (3.14 kg but with the stabilizing fins).

Both of those should be able to perforate almost any IFV/APC and tanks too depending on add on armour and location of the strike.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
3年,真让恁鳖给做出来了,当时大家还以为不过是某种探索尝试。而且和当时公开出来的方案除了少量细节变化外基本一致,可见完成度之高。

而且我觉得啊,虽然美帝的同类玩意儿已经用了十来年了,但是那点小而精的量实在不成气候。我们这个不是凑合搓的而是正经新弄的,整体完善得多,而且将来的保有量很大概率会比美国人的多。

确实值得欢呼,就是官宣怕不是还得几年。

 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Roughly translated:
Three years later, the real thing was made. At that time, everyone thought it was just some kind of exploratory attempt. And it is basically consistent with the plan that was released at the time, except for a few details changes, which shows high degree of completion.
And I think that although similar things from the United States have been used for more than ten years, the small and precise amount is really not enough. Ours is not just a makeshift but a serious new one. It is much more complete overall, and there is a high probability that the number in the future will be greater than that of the Americans.
It is indeed worth cheering, but the official announcement may not be for another few years.

Key points:
- 3 years from public disclosure (although many don't seem to mind if not outright missed it) to actual thing/platform completion/roll-out
- The US have similar thing/platform in use for 10+ years
- Chinese counterpart is better/more complete and can be available in larger numbers

So what is exactly that thing/platform?

RQ-180-counterpart?
V-280-conterpart?
Some kind of sub-orbital/orbital craft?
 
Last edited:

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
Roughly translated:




Key points:
- 3 years from public disclosure (although many don't seem to mind if not outright missed it) to actual thing/platform completion/roll-out
- The US have similar thing/platform in use for 10+ years
- Chinese counterpart is better/more complete and can be available in larger numbers

So what is exactly that thing/platform?

RQ-180-counterpart?
V-280-conterpart?
Some kind of sub-orbital/orbital craft?
Inb4 it's stealth helicopters. US had them for 10+ years, but I can easily see China building them more efficiently and actually making them widespread for airborne troops.

For RQ-180 equivalent, I think China has been flying them for very long. They were the first to fly a stealth flying wing UAV, and GJ-11 was "inducted" but nowhere (publicly) to be seen. China places so much emphasis on its non stealthy ISR drones and they've also had the tech to make a stealth ISR drone, it would be strange if they haven't been having them for 10+ years at least as well.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Roughly translated:




Key points:
- 3 years from public disclosure (although many don't seem to mind if not outright missed it) to actual thing/platform completion/roll-out
- The US have similar thing/platform in use for 10+ years
- Chinese counterpart is better/more complete and can be available in larger numbers

So what is exactly that thing/platform?

RQ-180-counterpart?
V-280-conterpart?
Some kind of sub-orbital/orbital craft?

It might be referring to stealthy flying wing UCAVs -- i.e.: that the US has had a stealthy flying wing UCAV in very limited use (perhaps the RQ-180 has a payload bay), but we all know GJ-11 exists and is being pursued for proper development and probably implementation on a larger scale.
 
Top