PLA (strategic) news, pics, and videos
- Thread starter dxq4412
- Start date
Lmao, how did they even have the face to write that shit.
There's like, still nothing that is deployed (unless we start counting the older ballistics as hypersonic)
Because of racism, isn’t it obvious? It’s like, “How could the Chinese possibly have technology that we don’t?” “Chinese people have no innovation, only steal and copy; everyone knows that.” “Americans are a chosen people, the most innovative nation; anything Americans create must be the best in the world.”
The conical type of hypersonic like C-HGB is lower on the tech tree than a glider but the latest test hit a target in Kwajalein within of the target so they're probably referring to that. The US has some (overly) ambitious things in their other programs like HTV-2 which apparently tried to steer the HGV without control surfaces (by displacing the center of gravity) and have advantages in C4ISR/guidance tech.
Having said that it is not entirely accurate to say this anymore
...since the US actually have a very good idea of how newer gen PLARF missiles perform
Having said that it is not entirely accurate to say this anymore
...since the US actually have a very good idea of how newer gen PLARF missiles perform
Last edited:
The cope is real. China will likely continue to pull further ahead of the US in hypersonics.
The US simply does not have the same number of high speed wind tunnels as China does. They lack the infrastructure to support a proper hypersonics program. Computer simulation can only go that far.
The US simply does not have the same number of high speed wind tunnels as China does. They lack the infrastructure to support a proper hypersonics program. Computer simulation can only go that far.
That is a very interesting, thorough and fair analysis, vastly superior to what we usually get out of Bharat.