szbd
Junior Member
I didn't say foreign tech workers are the foundation of the US defence sector.
What I said was, the vast network of non-defence labs, from universities and various commercial entities in which foreign tech workers do play NON-INSIGNIFICANT roles, form one of the foundations of the US military.
Note I've used a mere 'non-insignificant' to describe the contributions of the foreign tech workers to the NON-DEFENCE sector. Pls don't tell me the proper word should be 'non-existant' or 'insignificant'.
Perhaps u may want to argue the non-defence research sectors are not nearly as significant as the top-secret pure defence labs.
I'll say the opposite is true. The USSR had military scientists who were as good as their US counterparts.
One of the main reasons the US won was because of the endless flow of new developments and ideas from the universities and private companies to the defence sector.
These entities enjoyed far more research freedom, & freedom to employ foreign talents, & fundings from government & the market. This was something USSR had no hope of achieving.
In fact, if China, Japan & Europe are to have any hope of overtaking US in the defence area, let alone overall tech, they need to be more accomodating to free flow of foreign human resource like the US.
But one thing need to be noticed is, for non-defence research sectors, everything is published. So other countries can let their researchers to learn from those. However, what matter most to the defence technology are the things not published and those things are based on many other things never published for decades.