I've always thought JH-7 has shown tremendous potential in the naval strike role. China it seems, has been successful in integrating good avionics and weapons into this platform. I'm wondering how they are increasing it's payload though by one ton. And how that will affect it's combat radius. I don't think JH-7 can be air-refueled. But I think you're right. The implementation of LGB's, and the introduction of a land atttack version of YJ-83 on it gives it a higher rating than what was suggested years earlier.
Just so we don't steer off course on this J-10 thread, I find it interesting that J-10 will have 200 units by next year. They're well ahead of schedule if true. And proves that J-11 is definitely not the priority for PLAAF.
purchased of JH-7 was symbolic,the project started in late 70's by the time it enter service, it was out class by the russian SU-33/27,the order for JH-7 was reduced,to entice the PLAAF to purchase the JH-7 improvement being make to fire air to ground precsision weapon.
AVIC may have looking next gen/ of fighter bomber to replace JH-7A