I actually differ on this topic, in the context of living in the US for decades and understanding various angles from within or outside. To think like Mearsheimer as an excise of geopolitical analysis without any bindings or burdens, there is no sufficient evidence that says USAID has failed US. You may argue USAID has failed the American public, in terms of scope/level of corruption, but I doubt you have sufficient data to argue against the net benefits US (the country) has accrued since USAID was conceived. I am not auguring in terms of moral or social standards. In the United States, if you took out its raw capitalism, everything would not make sense any longer. People pledged allegiance to the constitution only and alone, but people came to the country, at the very first time, not for the greatness of its constitution.
That being said, I don't think China will ever practice like that, for its historical traditions and conventions. I don't think the Chinese public would accept that regardless of the net benefits the country might have gained. But I am convinced now that the American public actually have taken its net benefits for granted without knowing it or acknowledging it, which is one of the great ironies of our time.
It is entertaining watching all those threads related to DOGE in general and USAID in particular. But it is US media vis-a-vis US politics, which has become a national sport rather than a national statecraft.