Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
In which one of these 3 areas China is not the multiples of the US 'technically'?

Consumption share, production share, and trade share, across nearly all categories globally?

If you want we can run numbers, but that would just clutter the thread.

Even the nominal GDP number you probably base your assumption on was logically created to measure only the "PRODUCT" (tangible economic output), not fictional bullshit,

When first conceptualized, particularly in the 1930s by economist Simon Kuznets, it was meant as a way to assess things like manufacturing, agriculture, and infrastructure (think about China's lead in all 3).

Which the US later revised multiple times to fit their agenda and rotting economy, and forced other nations to adopt via international orgs.

However, China largely never adopted those crooked methods in its reporting.

So, by calling the US the "first economy", you regurgitate CIA brainwashing.

For example, Putin and Russia officially stopped using that metric altogether.

Putin said that by using that bullshit nominal indicator all those years - their enemies thought that they were weaker than they truly were and that the war showed so they attacked them.

From then on, since a few years ago, Russia and its media stopped mentioning it.
So, by calling the US the "first economy", you regurgitate CIA brainwashing.

How is this even controversial?

If I am regurgitating CIA brainwashing.

Then I guess China must have fallen decades ago and everything was bread and circus on a global scale.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun emphasized that as the world's second-largest economy, China adheres to high-quality development and high-level opening-up, contributing significantly to global economic growth over the long term. As the largest developing country, China remains deeply rooted in and attentive to the Global South, supporting these nations in achieving social development and improving livelihoods.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
How is this even controversial?

If I am regurgitating CIA brainwashing.

Then I guess China must have fallen decades ago and everything was bread of circus on a global scale.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

No, they say that for strategic reasons. Why interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake - type shit.

If you thought seriously that it was the truth, this entire time, then you are a personally brainwashed individual.

I would have done the same in their place. Imagine thinking you're about to confront a weakling, only to realize too late that you've been sizing up a beast the whole time, like stepping up at 5'10", 70kg, only to find out you're facing Brock Lesnar in the flesh.
 

4Runner

Junior Member
Registered Member
The real win is to always invest in one’s country and its people. When you’ve achieved tremendous success IRL, you no longer need to rely on petty propaganda.
I actually differ on this topic, in the context of living in the US for decades and understanding various angles from within or outside. To think like Mearsheimer as an excise of geopolitical analysis without any bindings or burdens, there is no sufficient evidence that says USAID has failed US. You may argue USAID has failed the American public, in terms of scope/level of corruption, but I doubt you have sufficient data to argue against the net benefits US (the country) has accrued since USAID was conceived. I am not auguring in terms of moral or social standards. In the United States, if you took out its raw capitalism, everything would not make sense any longer. People pledged allegiance to the constitution only and alone, but people came to the country, at the very first time, not for the greatness of its constitution.

That being said, I don't think China will ever practice like that, for its historical traditions and conventions. I don't think the Chinese public would accept that regardless of the net benefits the country might have gained. But I am convinced now that the American public actually have taken its net benefits for granted without knowing it or acknowledging it, which is one of the great ironies of our time.

It is entertaining watching all those threads related to DOGE in general and USAID in particular. But it is US media vis-a-vis US politics, which has become a national sport rather than a national statecraft.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
No, they say that for strategic reasons. Why interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake - type shit.

If you thought seriously that it was the truth, this entire time, then you are a personally brainwashed individual.

Cherry picking to pick a pointless internet fight is what you are trying to do. China has already fallen. It was actually an US puppet state for a global reality TV show. According to what you keep trying to imply. The US is the largest economy as I said before of service and debt. The fact you are in severe denial over this is incredible.

Adding this so I don’t have to make another post. The US economy is measured in US dollars, which is more valuable than other currencies as the global reserve. That will naturally distort the image of the global economy. Making the US the largest economy. They are the largest by quantity which I don’t know why this is so controversial to say.
 
Last edited:

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member

Microplastics block blood flow in the brain, mouse study reveals​

We have all become crayon eaters...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Toxicologist Matthew Campen estimates that he can isolate about 10 grams of microplastics from a donated human brain; that’s about the weight of an unused crayon.
Scientists are scrambling to understand how these tiny fragments, which have been found in every recess of our planet and our bodies, affect our health.



Electrolytes: it's what the plants crave!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If NIH and NSF reduce overhead from ~55% on individual extramural grants to 15%, all research institutions in Georgia will die. And everywhere else, too.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
I actually differ on this topic, in the context of living in the US for decades and understanding various angles from within or outside. To think like Mearsheimer as an excise of geopolitical analysis without any bindings or burdens, there is no sufficient evidence that says USAID has failed US. You may argue USAID has failed the American public, in terms of scope/level of corruption, but I doubt you have sufficient data to argue against the net benefits US (the country) has accrued since USAID was conceived. I am not auguring in terms of moral or social standards. In the United States, if you took out its raw capitalism, everything would not make sense any longer. People pledged allegiance to the constitution only and alone, but people came to the country, at the very first time, not for the greatness of its constitution.

That being said, I don't think China will ever practice like that, for its historical traditions and conventions. I don't think the Chinese public would accept that regardless of the net benefits the country might have gained. But I am convinced now that the American public actually have taken its net benefits for granted without knowing it or acknowledging it, which is one of the great ironies of our time.

It is entertaining watching all those threads related to DOGE in general and USAID in particular. But it is US media vis-a-vis US politics, which has become a national sport rather than a national statecraft.
Cost of opportunity. USAID helped defeat other countries, until it cannot. Then it lives as a self-propagating parasite that eat away potential for growth. Once it meets an opponent resistant to toppling, it gets stuck. And there is no changing strategy because those benefit from USAID will fight any change in strategy.

Once you analysis from a higher dimension than immediate cost/benefit, you will understand its harm.
 
Top