We might see a global nuclear arms race. Especially if the ideas from Project 2025 is implemented.
As such, while Trump may be “bumbling” and many think they have ways to “handle him,” you’ll very likely see these same Reaganite wannabe neocons and literal white nationalist figures from his first term rear their heads again as his new appointees— who want no negotiation or compromise with China other than their delusion of repeating the Soviet collapse. If so, one can expect to see the same kind of intransigent arrogance directed towards China that the Biden administration have shown in refusing to deal with Russia in any meaningful way.
somehow, I think this is too little too late for Germany. Scholz has already destroyed Germany and there is no going back even if they get a new leader. The trust is broken and their is no way things can be fixed over nightGermany faces snap election as Scholz's coalition crumbles
- Scholz sacks finance minister Lindner over budget disputes
- Scholz expected to lead minority government with Social Democrats and Greens
- Political shake-up could benefit populist movements such as AfD
View attachment 138537
The meltdown continues in r/europe.
It seems extremely unfeasible for US as well. China is entirely focused on its application in strikes, not to deliver stuff.I saw in the nasa thread that spacex is going to test starship again and reenter in the Indian ocean. That made me look up rockets for military logistics it actually seem to have been an idea in the 1950s called project icarus. Being able to quickly move hundreds of tons cheaply between US manufacturing hubs and landing platforms in the rest of the world seems like a nice capability to have especially if you can do it on sea based barges.
Do China/russia have such a concept?
The guy who wrote that comment knows jack about the multi-polar world we are living in. The US' trade war with China will hardly affect China's GDP because of China's BRI and China's rapid economic integration with the Global South.oh well. old things are fashionable again. This enthusiasm for trade and economic war reminds me the last they tried this, they had similar beliefs
View attachment 138493
Did you consider that your landing platform elsewhere in the world need to have a full sized launch complex, storage for a few thousand tons of cryogenic propellant and a Starship booster on standby? Now calculate how much it cost to blow it up.I saw in the nasa thread that spacex is going to test starship again and reenter in the Indian ocean. That made me look up rockets for military logistics it actually seem to have been an idea in the 1950s called project icarus. Being able to quickly move hundreds of tons cheaply between US manufacturing hubs and landing platforms in the rest of the world seems like a nice capability to have especially if you can do it on sea based barges.
Do China/russia have such a concept?