Miscellaneous News

Iracundus

New Member
Registered Member
As such, while Trump may be “bumbling” and many think they have ways to “handle him,” you’ll very likely see these same Reaganite wannabe neocons and literal white nationalist figures from his first term rear their heads again as his new appointees— who want no negotiation or compromise with China other than their delusion of repeating the Soviet collapse. If so, one can expect to see the same kind of intransigent arrogance directed towards China that the Biden administration have shown in refusing to deal with Russia in any meaningful way.

This above. When Trump initiated a trade war, perhaps under the influence of these guys, he issued terms of economic surrender basically as conditions for avoiding the tariffs. They were terms that no leader of any country could seriously consider as it was complete loss of economic sovereignty and abject surrender, and therefore would be political suicide. That is why I think people are mistaken to think there would be any serious deal making when the other side is basically demanding surrender in return for no further punishment. That's not negotiation. It's extortion.

The inherent unconscious racism and arrogance of these guys will also mean they will take any Chinese attempts to de-escalate as weakness, while not taking seriously any Chinese threats of retaliation since their worldview is so unconsciously skewed by their assumptions of white superiority. That is how things could slip into a spiral of escalation.
 

jiajia99

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Germany faces snap election as Scholz's coalition crumbles​

  • Scholz sacks finance minister Lindner over budget disputes
  • Scholz expected to lead minority government with Social Democrats and Greens
  • Political shake-up could benefit populist movements such as AfD


View attachment 138537

The meltdown continues in r/europe.
somehow, I think this is too little too late for Germany. Scholz has already destroyed Germany and there is no going back even if they get a new leader. The trust is broken and their is no way things can be fixed over night
 

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
I saw in the nasa thread that spacex is going to test starship again and reenter in the Indian ocean. That made me look up rockets for military logistics it actually seem to have been an idea in the 1950s called project icarus. Being able to quickly move hundreds of tons cheaply between US manufacturing hubs and landing platforms in the rest of the world seems like a nice capability to have especially if you can do it on sea based barges.

Do China/russia have such a concept?
 

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
I saw in the nasa thread that spacex is going to test starship again and reenter in the Indian ocean. That made me look up rockets for military logistics it actually seem to have been an idea in the 1950s called project icarus. Being able to quickly move hundreds of tons cheaply between US manufacturing hubs and landing platforms in the rest of the world seems like a nice capability to have especially if you can do it on sea based barges.

Do China/russia have such a concept?
It seems extremely unfeasible for US as well. China is entirely focused on its application in strikes, not to deliver stuff.

The more feasible method is by a very fast plane

hypersonic-plane-china-speed.png
But basically only China is working on this. The one that flew is above pic, but there are very exotic theory designs 98f7a2fbca7a4469b9f71cc9ea78b427.jpg

US, I predict, would spend most of its money to make sure they can get a 6th gen not too far after China gets theirs. And also improve missile systems.

The idea of a global strike system has captured imaginations on both sides of the Pacific for a long time, but it is more important to US procurement efforts to get the basics in order before attempting possibly low return expensive projects.
 

supercat

Major
oh well. old things are fashionable again. This enthusiasm for trade and economic war reminds me the last they tried this, they had similar beliefs
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

View attachment 138493
The guy who wrote that comment knows jack about the multi-polar world we are living in. The US' trade war with China will hardly affect China's GDP because of China's BRI and China's rapid economic integration with the Global South.
 

iewgnem

Junior Member
Registered Member
I saw in the nasa thread that spacex is going to test starship again and reenter in the Indian ocean. That made me look up rockets for military logistics it actually seem to have been an idea in the 1950s called project icarus. Being able to quickly move hundreds of tons cheaply between US manufacturing hubs and landing platforms in the rest of the world seems like a nice capability to have especially if you can do it on sea based barges.

Do China/russia have such a concept?
Did you consider that your landing platform elsewhere in the world need to have a full sized launch complex, storage for a few thousand tons of cryogenic propellant and a Starship booster on standby? Now calculate how much it cost to blow it up.
 
Top