PikeCowboy
Junior Member
Xi responds by having 3 tea cups on his desk at the next meeting to assert dominance
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Even RT, a fellow Jai Hind mouthpiece is warning India that it's "demographic dividend" is not gonna be there for long. The Indians and Westerners always like to gloat about China growing old before it could get rich. Well how about India growing old before it could even reach middle income at all?
Indian fertility rates are plummeting fast, and no religious group are the exception.
Apparently for China, more older people means the death of the nation. But in India, older people could become "silver dividend". More Indian spin-job.
Investments into what sector to leverage what potential of the young population? You've forgotten the most important key to harnessing potential: education. Lack of education = lack of potential and opportunities. India is still obsessed about Jai Hind and Hindutva instead of education at this point in time. So the future of India is not looking good.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
The Western spin machine is on overdrive. First they said China is upset at the new Russian/North Korean alliance. Now they say China is upset at Russia and Vietnam meeting. Again the West trying to make out what they're upset about being about China more. That's why the West is racist thinking they can make others fall for their stupid tricks. The West is the one upset at these meetings. Try to will China into doing their dirty work by stopping it. This is the West's grave mistake thinking they can piss-off both Russia and China at the same time. They've gone past the point of no return because trying to cancel China just because it's a competitor in technology makes it harder for them to deal with the world who see China as an alternative from them for economics. China ain't going along anymore. An example of the US's negotiating genius is when China started buying Brazilian soy over American. The US thought is can start a soy alliance to control China with Brazil but that would mean Brazil would lose out on selling soy to China because the ultimate goal was to get China back to buying American soy. This was when anti-China Bolsonaro was in power and they couldn't even get him to go along. The whole point from the American perspective is that they think just being a part of something white people were involved in is more important than anything else even if it means losing billions of dollars.
US: we are legally obligated under the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) to replenish depleted arms/weapons to maintain a balance of power across the straits.
China: we are legally obligated under the 1961 Sino-Korean MDT to replenish depleted arms/weapons to maintain a balance of power across the DMZ.
NK: Big brother, my entire arsenal stockpile of artillery is gone somewhere...can you send me another 2 million shells please?
China: A brotha gotta do what a brotha gotta do.
US: Wait, not like that, tariff, embargo, sanction, [autistic screech] REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
Counter example is the China-NK treaty used the same wording "military assistance" (军事援助), one can't deny "boots on the ground" being part of the assistant package considering that China has already done so even without a treaty. Treaties are always written in a manner that suits the specific situation at the time when invoked and primarily meant for others to read.
The often quoted article 5 of NATO treaty is NOT any different from the China-NK-Russian treaties.
In short it says "in case of one party being attacked, other parties will assist by taking neccessary action including use of armed force. NATO listed armed force as one of the assistances, but does not oblidge members to do so either.
So based on the texts, both treaties promised assistance, but neither of them oblidges any party to provide armed force.
Last edited:
supercat
Colonel
The bravery of Filipinos can't be overestimated. For example, the one who lost the thumb still wants to go back to fighting. I guess you can still pull the trigger without the thumb.
The problem with the average Indians:
CPC officially banned hijab in Xinjiang.
I guess you meant to say Tajikstan because China has banned it many years ago.
I guess now the west will accuse Tajiks discriminating and culturally geniciding Tajiks. There is a proposal in Kazakhstan to ban hijab, soon the west will accuse Kazaks discriminating and culturally geniciding Kazaks. How mind-fucking it is.
BTW, I want to see Turkish FM or Erdogan to certify that Kazakhstan isn't persecuting "Turkic" Kazakhs as he to Xinjiang/Uyghurs.
Last edited:
The same thing happened to the Pope in Europe. He used to be the head of a state (Papal States).
But now he is reduced to controlling the Vatican City and a mostly ceremonial role. While the former Papal States were absorbed by Italy.
This did not happen peacefully either. Piedmont annexed it by force and incorporated it into Italy.
Better stick to something she’s good at, like
