Miscellaneous News

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Russia could arm North Korea – Putin​

Russia reserves the right to provide arms to allies, as the West claims it can arm Ukraine with impunity, and could send long-range weapons to the DPRK and other countries, Vladimir Putin has said.

Putin was speaking with reporters in Hanoi following his meetings with Vietnam's leadership on Thursday. One of the questions related to his previous suggestion that Moscow could send missiles to adversaries of the West, in response to the US and its allies greenlighting Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russia.

We do not rule out supplying weapons to other countries, including the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” Putin said. “Let the West think where they might end up.”

Western countries that have supplied long-range and other weapons to Ukraine have said they can’t be held responsible for how Kiev uses them, and insist that it does not make them parties to the conflict, Putin elaborated, adding that Russia therefore reserves the same right for itself.

The Russian president also noted that Moscow is considering modifications to its doctrine on the use of atomic weapons, as the West appears to be working on low-yield weapons to lower the nuclear threshold.

“We don’t need a first strike,” he said in response to another question. “Because our return strike is guaranteed to destroy any attacker.”
Russia reserves the right to provide arms to allies, as the West claims it can arm Ukraine with impunity, and could send long-range weapons to the DPRK and other countries, Vladimir Putin has said.
Western countries that have supplied long-range and other weapons to Ukraine have said they can’t be held responsible for how Kiev uses them, and insist that it does not make them parties to the conflict, Putin elaborated, adding that Russia therefore reserves the same right for itself.
 

pevade

Junior Member
Registered Member
Another troubled Boeing plane. This time a Malaysian Airlines 737-8H6 jet flying from Hyderabad to Kuala Lumpur.

The plane made an emergency landing after experiencing engine troubles.
I dont think you can blame that on Boeing since they dont manufacture the engines. Then again they could have messed up installation/engine related components.
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
I thought the disinfo budget was 500 mil
That's just the state department disinfo budget. There's also a Pentagon disinfo budget, a black disinfo budget, a CIA disinfo budget, and tons of grants for disinfo outlets like Epoch Times, NYT, CNN, YouTube, Reddit, Twitter, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if the real total disinfo budget was in the tens of billions per year.
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
This is what a "position of weakness" officially looks like my friends.

Incompetent rotting empire living in the past, the new Soviet Union.






To clarify, such endless, extreme protectionist measures are generally sensible only for young empires/countries with realistic growth potentials and without accumulated structural rot, like the US today has, to use.

Every major Western country and modern China developed partially through this way (not full bans, ofc), to be honest, it is just that you can't do this once you are so old, it's like an old lady trying to wear a young girl clothes.

Introducing these measures late, in the twilight years of an empire, when it's clear that you can't mechanically produce the same quality or competitively priced products anymore, due to systematic rot, can lead to premature collapse instead.

Moreover, in an economy like the US, which is heavily rent-seeking nowadays (due to being in that late imperial stage), eliminating even more competition would only widen the technological gap behind China paradoxically and increase inflation.

Thus, such moves are only logical in the early stages of an empire. Tariffs are generally a better option because they don't completely eliminate competition and still require domestic companies to make an effort.

Total bans like this one were not even implemented during the economic growth stages of these Western countries and Japan instead, they mostly put around a maximum of 30% tariffs + subsidies (other benefits through industrial policy) back then.

Total bans of foreign products are generally traits of failed states. What's also going on against the US this time is their pride to try and learn from China, their arrogance doesn't allow that - so they'll never grow.







Also, I found Niall Ferguson's new thread chain with a bunch of charts illustrating the collapse better than ever (I didn't expect this from him):

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
This is what a "position of weakness" officially looks like my friends.

Incompetent rotting empire living in the past, the new Soviet Union.






To clarify, such endless, extreme protectionist measures are generally sensible only for young empires/countries with realistic growth potentials and without accumulated structural rot, like the US today has, to use.

Every major Western country and modern China developed partially through this way (not full bans, ofc), to be honest, it is just that you can't do this once you are so old, it's like an old lady trying to wear a young girl clothes.

Introducing these measures late, in the twilight years of an empire, when it's clear that you can't mechanically produce the same quality or competitively priced products anymore, due to systematic rot, can lead to premature collapse instead.

Moreover, in an economy like the US, which is heavily rent-seeking nowadays (due to being in that late imperial stage), eliminating even more competition would only widen the technological gap behind China paradoxically and increase inflation.

Thus, such moves are only logical in the early stages of an empire. Tariffs are generally a better option because they don't completely eliminate competition and still require domestic companies to make an effort.

Total bans like this one were not even implemented during the economic growth stages of these Western countries and Japan instead, they mostly put around a maximum of 30% tariffs + subsidies (other benefits through industrial policy) back then.

Total bans of foreign products are generally traits of failed states. What's also going on against the US this time is their pride to try and learn from China, their arrogance doesn't allow that - so they'll never grow.







Also, I found Niall Ferguson's new thread chain with a bunch of charts illustrating the collapse better than ever (I didn't expect this from him):

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
USG probably got on his bad side somehow.
 

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Australian Government urged to rapidly intervene to prevent missile manufacturer falling into Chinese hands​

Two senior ministers stand accused of sitting on their hands as China seeks to swoop in and buy a major South American missile manufacturer that could still come to Australia if the federal government acts swiftly.

The move by Norinco - the main supplier of Chinese weapons - to attempt to buy cash strapped Brazilian manufacturer Avibras has turned what could have been an unprecedented defence acquisition by an entirely sovereign owned Australian company, into a potential national security threat.

Should China be successful, insiders believe it would equip the People’s Liberation Army with the intellectual property needed to modernize its soviet era guidance systems and manufacture long range coastal strike weapons deemed ideal for a strike on Taiwan.

“It is deeply concerning that my warnings and requests seem to be falling on deaf ears,” said Travis Reddy, CEO of Australian company DefendTex whose exclusivity period to buy Avibras expires at the end of the month, unless he can get urgent Commonwealth support.

For 18 months he has been asking the Government through Export Finance Australia to loan DefendTex the additional $70m it needs to close the roughly $200m deal, pledging to repay the money plus interest with contracts already signed within 12 months.

The fears of the CEO, who is also a defence veteran, seem well founded. Sky News has seen a secret letter between the Chinese State-owned company, Norinco and the Brazillian defence Minister, José Múcio Monteiro Filho.

Translated from Portuguese, Norinco’s Vice President suggests “a government-to-government agreement … financed through the government of China”, making clear Chinese Communist Party’s ambitions to purchase the distressed asset.

Appearing to sweeten the deal, Beijing also offers to manufacture Chinese weapons in Brazil, promising “the full integration of Chinese products with the Brazilian Army systems.”

“We can act decisively in order to prevent a future problem or we can suffer from inaction and let the world change around us,” Mr Reddy told Sky News, admitting he was taken back by China’s power play.

He believes it now alters the purchase of Avibras from a strategic ambition to a matter unambiguously in Australia’s national interest.

Despite repeated efforts, however, the CEO’s attempts to meet with senior members of government continue to be rebuffed.

The Commonwealth has made clear its intention to develop a guide weapons program in alliance with the American defence industry to the tune of more than four-billion-dollars.

“I’ve attempted multiple times to make contract at the ministerial level and so far, I’ve still been unable to get a face-to-face meeting,” Mr Reddy said.

Last week the frustrated CEO even emailed the Defence Minister, Richard Marles and Defence Industry Minister, Pat Conroy to request a meeting, but was told by staff who worked for the later, that the minister’s diary was full.

“The question is if China can see the value in the acquisition, with all of its industrial capacity, why can’t Australia see it?”

DefendTex while small by international standards, is no novice. It currently designs and manufactures loitering munitions that are sold to the United Kingdom and the United States. Its weapons are also used extensively in Ukraine.

It had hoped to continue manufacturing Avibras hardware in Brazil, while also setting up a parallel manufacturing line in regional Victoria, where it could potentially supply advanced rockets and ballistic missiles to the Australian Defence Force, expand its foreign sales and create what it estimates to be five-hundred local jobs.

The CEO spoke to Sky News having landed in Singapore on route to France where he now intends to seek financial backing from a European nation, fearing the consequences if a “potential” adversary acquired Avibras.

“(I’m going) cap in hand to Europe to see if of the other nations will step up and do what we should be doing.”
Translated from Portuguese, Norinco’s Vice President suggests “a government-to-government agreement … financed through the government of China”, making clear Chinese Communist Party’s ambitions to purchase the distressed asset.

Appearing to sweeten the deal, Beijing also offers to manufacture Chinese weapons in Brazil, promising “the full integration of Chinese products with the Brazilian Army systems.”
The move by Norinco - the main supplier of Chinese weapons - to attempt to buy cash strapped Brazilian manufacturer Avibras has turned what could have been an unprecedented defence acquisition by an entirely sovereign owned Australian company, into a potential national security threat.

China: outbids Australian company to buy Brazilian assets with zero connections to Australia MIC

Australia: NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT.
 
Top