Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
The installation of security beehives along the India-Bangladesh border raises several concerns. It can have unintended consequences. First, there's the potential for harm to innocent civilians and wildlife. Bees can be unpredictable, and their aggressive response to perceived threats could lead to unintended casualties. Furthermore, the cost of maintaining and managing these beehives, including beekeeping training, equipment, and infrastructure, might be substantial. This expenditure could divert funds from more pressing border security and development needs, potentially exacerbating existing socioeconomic and diplomatic issues between the two nations. Lastly, it's essential to consider the environmental impact, as large-scale deployment of beehives could disrupt local ecosystems and the natural behavior of these important pollinators.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
-Napoleon Bonaparte
-Napoleon Bonaparte
10-20 years. That's way too long, they'll come crawling back to China next year.
Man those replies and quotes are hilarious. If those white men won't even die for Israel, they definitely won't die for Wanwan.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
This argument is going in circles because you don't even have an argument point and you are unable to understand definitions that aren't snowflaked.
It's basically impossible to argue in good faith with someone who thinks that refusing to patronize someone's business and exercising one's basic right to spend one's money where one sees fit is economic bullying.
For the record, you unloaded a dumpster full of nonsense only in the end to agree with me that an invasion of South Korea would be bullying and that witholding business is not bullying.
It has everything to do with China acting within its own rights and not violating others' rights.
Like I said before, to those in a mental wheelchair, just seeing someone walk around feels like you're watching mental gymnastics. And this is the first time on this forum I've heard of a person accuse another of mental gymnastics only to admit that his conclusion is the same.
It's a reaction within one's own rights to another country that acted within its rights. Just because you can't wrap your head around the meaning or importance of rights doesn't mean that it's not center stage in determining if you are in the right or wrong.
Which, you apparently had no choice but to begrudgingly concede.
So... that means you agree that every ban or tariff that the US imposed was completely ok and did not constitute any bullying.
No, you're confused with your Bruce Lee example.
LOLOL No, your simple mind has once again entangled the legal aspect with the moral aspect when they can and should be separated. And your statement falls along the line of, "Even if A applies, your example is still B, and thus invalid." No. A and B are separate. Morally, you can compare international relations with personal relations.
Let me help you with an example. You asked whether I can refuse service to Jewish customers in the US. No, I cannot because that is illegal discrimination violating US domestic law. However, if we depart the legal realm and move into the moral realm, I can do it, because as a private business owner, I have the right to serve and not serve whomever I choose and as long as I nonviolently decline service to those Jewish would-be patrons, I have stayed within my rights and not violated theirs. So in a comparable case where no law was there to prevent one exercising this freedom to choose one's business partners, such as in international trade, an Arabic country can absolutely say that they will ban business with Israel.
I'm going to use that example from the moral aspect and your legal application is invalid because those are separate. The only feeling I have for crying is why you're so dense you still don't get this. And then I realize it's because it's coming from the same "mind" that ignored imperialism and brought up Bruce Lee's clip for inclusivity/exclusivity.
Except the governing body is completely paralyzed with no ability to rule, effectively nullifying those laws. Even before that, China and the US routinely broke those laws and used their powers within the WTO to put the cases in legal limbo until they died. Effectively speaking, international trade is only governed by the will of countries to buy and sell from each other.
Last edited:
America is not doing as poorly as you think. They're currently cannibalizing Europe to maintain themselves but Europe still has a lot of wealth to plunder yet. I don't see them collapsing anytime soon.
That's not the fight that they are fighting. Tech, wealth, trade are all secondary to the preeminent reason: no chinaman can be allowed to surpass any god-fearing white man. They will continue to fight in this realm as long as China is not the obvious leader.
It was never about technology or economics.
LOL! All that new 100M toilets, and Indians are returning to open defecation?
LOL! All that hype, and that worthless award.
So 100M new toilets and a few years later, Indians are going back to open defecation? That's a colossal policy failure!
No, only Bill Gates and the Jai Hinds gave the acclaim. The rest of the world couldn't care less about India's toilet habits. Toilets are a basic human necessity, but in India, it is somehow a luxury.
Toilet usage is declining in India in recent years, even after 100M toilets have been built.
This is what happens when the Modi educates the masses to embrace religion and reject science. No more periodic tables, theorems and Darwin for schools, but yes for more religious studies.
Why did Modi built toilets, but didn't build the water supply infrastructure for dry areas?
What? So Modi have built toilets but not the sewage system? And no supply chains for janitors to clean them? So Modi's new toilets can't flush, and can't be cleaned? Yuck! Who could blame the villagers for abandoning them.
That's Modi's approach to policy implementation in a nutshell.
LOL! No open defecation, or else no food subsidies! This is how the Modi government approaches the problem, by treating Indian citizens like pet animals. When you build toilets that cannot flush and be cleaned, who the hell wants to use them? So now you use the carrot and stick approach to force people to use them. This is just so Modi's India.
Last edited:
