For those that don't understand the history of Western anthropology, I'll explain it. According to Western anthropology, there are only three races on the Earth. Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. When you're dead and buried and all that is left is your skeleton, they can tell if you're Caucasoid, Negroid, or Mongoloid just by looking at your bones. You may not know it today because of stereotypes but Africans and East Asians together were seen as the lowest humans in the world. Some Asians I tell this to are in disbelief because they want to think East Asians are up there with white Caucasians and in their own racism they don't want to believe they're seen at the same level as Africans. Don't worry if Asians are seen as racist because of it. There are African-Americans that identify with whites more and look down at Asians as being inferior to them as well. Why do Westerners call people who are mentally retarded or have cerebral palsy as people afflicted with Mongolism? It's because they associate it with those who look like Mongoloids. So you don't think East Asians were ever seen as the lowest of the low?
I've talked about how the West especially during their colonial period basically went around the world teaching everyone to hate and be suspicious of one another so that everyone else hates one another but no one hates white Westerners taking attention off their crimes against humanity. Look at Hong Kong. There the British made a distinction of who were superior Chinese as opposed to inferior Chinese. Of course the superior Chinese embrace British rule and their way of doing things. And you see that legacy today how Hong Kongers hate Mainland Chinese like they were a different race. The West especially drew the lines of who to hate more in the world when it came to Africans and East Asians. Many other parts of the world where they weren't "white" like the Middle East and India but they were Caucasian anthropologically. That's why there's only three races according Western anthropology. Those people were taught to really hate Africans and East Asians.
During the Cold War radical Islam was more of a problem for the West towards the end. Before that, they looked down at Africans and East Asians as inferior to them like Westerners did. So don't think like with people in the Middle East saw it as "us" Arabs, Africans, and Asians versus white Caucasians. That's why don't count on Turkey being a loyal friend to China because they identify with being "white" more and Chinese as lesser to them. And just like Westerners, because Chinese don't follow their hierarchy of things, they probably resent China's success. You see it in Brazil too. Why do right-wing Brazilians tend to be anti-China? China didn't do anything in history to them. It's like a Brazilian right-wight supporter of Bolsonaro said, he was envious and hated China because he thought Brazil should be where China is at in the world today. So the crime is Chinese not knowing their place below Brazilians.
That brings up Latin America. Did you know that all Latin American countries see Mexico as the lowest of Latin countries? Why? Because Mexicans are seen as the most mixed with Indians. Most Latin American countries look to how closer their are to Spain and Europe. Why the hate with Indians? Because the indigenous people of the Americas are of Mongoloid descent.
So don't be surprised by how countries you think wouldn't have a beef with China do. What's the difference between China and the West today is China has the money. When it comes down to it China is as vulnerable as much as the West is experiencing today because that's what everyone wants. Is anyone surprised how countries aren't as "loyal" to China as you think? You have Chinese who think say nothing do nothing is what's best for China. If there are Chinese who think China should do nothing even when wronged. you think other countries see they can depend on China when Chinese don't even defend themselves?
I was recently told that China shouldn’t retaliate over Biden’s tariffs if it doesn’t really do anything. Then apply that logic to why does China like to publicly proclaim how Western actions hurts China when it really doesn’t? For example, being a member of the International Space Station… it was so important to Beijing. China can build its own space station and has. No harm to China done. Look at Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei. When the US was attacking his company and kidnapped his daughter for ransom, he was crying US sanctions against Huawei was hurting and calling for the US to stop. Today Huawei is making more money than ever without the US and the West as customers. Huawei is now appropriately a threat to the West’s semiconductor industries.
Why would anyone side with China when some Chinese prefer to make China look vulnerable to the West? People want to side with the strong not with the weak. Yes, it is true that there’s no such thing as allies but only self-interests. This includes the West. The US’s own “allies” only side with the US because of self-interests and not because the US is a beacon of all that is good. Europe hates Donald Trump but they’ll follow behind him because they are that weak without the US on their side.
People don't have to wonder why the West has this advantage. It's not hard to understand. They were in control of the world for four hundred years. They colonized most of the world. They're white supremacists who wanted the world to believe they were superior because those that believed it were less likely to go against it. Generations have lived and died where nothing but white supremacy being brainwashed to most of the world to know nothing else. That’s why the world slants towards the West.