Miscellaneous News

MelianPretext

New Member
Registered Member
All right folks, while it’s been interesting to see members here try to make heads and tails of the recent Tiktok developments immediately following another one of the community's bits against “soft power,” some interpretations have become rather ridiculous.

No, the Tiktok ban isn't about AI, or Israel, or the election. The goal of exterminating Tiktok has been a thing since Trump, who tried to sell it to the Republican-supporting CEO of Oracle as a last feather in his cap before the election. That was 4 years ago, before the subsequent GPT AI mania in the public consciousness, and the campaign has been ongoing since 2020. Neither will the tactic of having a Singaporean public face "CEO" and being domiciled in Singapore going to fool anyone on the platform’s true origins. Some here are confusing the useful external rhetoric with the real material context that should be implicitly understood.

What the Tiktok blackmail really amounts to is a test by the US of whether China is willing to submit to a precedent of being treated the same way its subordinates like France has been.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The inevitably craven French government pretended aloofness and allowed it to happen while French national Alstom executives like Frédéric Pierucci were imprisoned and tortured. Thus, what’s really at stake in the theft of Tiktok is the precedent it will set of allowing the US (and every other adversarial government, for that matter) to steal Chinese technological assets with impunity by broad daylight in front of China itself. As such, the saving grace for Tiktok isn’t going to be the "power" of the American Gen Z “vote", or the same Trump who did it first, or Bytedance’s comprador aspirant CEO, or the "fair-mindedness" of the US courts. The only thing that will stop this expropriation attempt is China itself, under its technological export restriction law promulgated specifically as a reaction to the Trump era forced sale attempt, which bans the sale of sensitive algorithms like Tiktok’s without Chinese regulatory approval.

With this in mind, as has always been the case ever since Trump-Oracle's 2020 theft attempt 4 years ago, it would be better for China to allow its outright ban in the US (and whichever subsequent bandwagon countries that follow the US' lead) than allow a long lasting working precedent to be set that legitimates future expropriation of Chinese assets, which in this case would also directly flaunt China’s 2020 export restriction law. The banning of US Tiktok is secondary to the threat of the expropriation precedent.

Yet another thing that should be mentioned is that Tiktok really does unironically pose a genuine “threat” to the US state apparatus. All the media noise following the Twitter Files obfuscated the official confirmation it gave that every single US social media platform has active communication channels to US intelligence/military/state personnel, connected by working relationships via email. They reveal the latter sent regular directives on which US propaganda accounts/content to artificially boost and on which accounts whose content disrupts US narratives to “algorithmically” suppress visibility, censor and ban. While Tiktok Global has already been couped internally by US personnel including ex-NSA officials, the official link to its parent company makes the recreation of a similar communication channel with Tiktok Global vulnerable of exposure to Bytedance, at least “psychologically” from the US OpSec perspective.

Through this, Tiktok is the only major social media platform in the entire English speaking world not entirely beholden to US state manipulation. This makes the short form app, with no exaggeration, a genuine challenge to the complete US hegemonic monopoly over social media and its ability to deplatform opposition and dissident voices not just in the West but in every country on the planet which lacks indigenously operated social media platforms (which is to say nearly every country with the exception of China itself).

These are the real reasons why Tiktok is once again being subjected to this latest expropriation attempt and why the US has been actively trying to steal Tiktok continuously for the past 4 years. Its reasons for doing so have perennial motive which are irrespective of whatever outlying current excuse some may believe as the "driving rationales." With bipartisan and unanimous agreement towards its theft as recent events show, the US is evidently clear eyed on its true intentions towards Tiktok and some members here should reciprocate a sober clearheadedness in kind towards recognizing what is really at stake in the eyes of the US state.
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
Yep, the courts will put a pause the ban on it as it's unconstitutional and violation of first amendment, drag on for years.
Congress and Biden appears "tough", and people will forget about it after the election.
After the election Trump will be president, because Gen Z will not vote for a Biden that just tried to ban Tik Tok. The optics of this are super atrocious for election turnout.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I get what you mean, but idk, nowadays people get over stuff pretty quickly, e.g. the abortion thing, it was talked about as if the second french revolution was upon us, and it fizzled out anyway

the way I see it, chinese administrators are more interested in finding a deal, I'd be very surprised if they let it just burn instead of selling it to an american company
if it just switches owners, users will only be mildly inconvenienced
US is a tiny fraction of the Tik Tok market.

Abandon the entire brand for a tiny share? Fuck that. Fight it in court and if lose pull out proactively.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
All right folks, while it’s been interesting to see members here try to make heads and tails of the recent Tiktok developments immediately following another one of the community's bits against “soft power,” some interpretations have become rather ridiculous.

No, the Tiktok ban isn't about AI, or Israel, or the election. The goal of exterminating Tiktok has been a thing since Trump, who tried to sell it to the Republican-supporting CEO of Oracle as a last feather in his cap before the election. That was 4 years ago, before the subsequent GPT AI mania in the public consciousness, and the campaign has been ongoing since 2020. Neither will the tactic of having a Singaporean public face "CEO" and being domiciled in Singapore going to fool anyone on the platform’s true origins. Some here are confusing the useful external rhetoric with the real material context that should be implicitly understood.

What the Tiktok blackmail really amounts to is a test by the US of whether China is willing to submit to a precedent of being treated the same way its subordinates like France has been.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The inevitably craven French government pretended aloofness and allowed it to happen while French national Alstom executives like Frédéric Pierucci were imprisoned and tortured. Thus, what’s really at stake in the theft of Tiktok is the precedent it will set of allowing the US (and every other adversarial government, for that matter) to steal Chinese technological assets with impunity by broad daylight in front of China itself. As such, the saving grace for Tiktok isn’t going to be the "power" of the American Gen Z “vote", or the same Trump who did it first, or Bytedance’s comprador aspirant CEO, or the "fair-mindedness" of the US courts. The only thing that will stop this expropriation attempt is China itself, under its technological export restriction law promulgated specifically as a reaction to the Trump era forced sale attempt, which bans the sale of sensitive algorithms like Tiktok’s without Chinese regulatory approval.

With this in mind, as has always been the case ever since Trump-Oracle's 2020 theft attempt 4 years ago, it would be better for China to allow its outright ban in the US (and whichever subsequent bandwagon countries that follow the US' lead) than allow a long lasting working precedent to be set that legitimates future expropriation of Chinese assets, which in this case would also directly flaunt China’s 2020 export restriction law. The banning of US Tiktok is secondary to the threat of the expropriation precedent.

Yet another thing that should be mentioned is that Tiktok really does unironically pose a genuine “threat” to the US state apparatus. All the media noise following the Twitter Files obfuscated the official confirmation it gave that every single US social media platform has active communication channels to US intelligence/military/state personnel, connected by working relationships via email. They reveal the latter sent regular directives on which US propaganda accounts/content to artificially boost and on which accounts whose content disrupts US narratives to “algorithmically” suppress visibility, censor and ban. While Tiktok Global has already been couped internally by US personnel including ex-NSA officials, the official link to its parent company makes the recreation of a similar communication channel with Tiktok Global vulnerable of exposure to Bytedance, at least “psychologically” from the US OpSec perspective.

Through this, Tiktok is the only major social media platform in the entire English speaking world not entirely beholden to US state manipulation. This makes the short form app, with no exaggeration, a genuine challenge to the complete US hegemonic monopoly over social media and its ability to deplatform opposition and dissident voices not just in the West but in every country on the planet which lacks indigenously operated social media platforms (which is to say nearly every country with the exception of China itself).

These are the real reasons why Tiktok is once again being subjected to this latest expropriation attempt and why the US has been actively trying to steal Tiktok continuously for the past 4 years. Its reasons for doing so have perennial motive which are irrespective of whatever outlying current excuse some may believe as the "driving rationales." With bipartisan and unanimous agreement towards its theft as recent events show, the US is evidently clear eyed on its true intentions towards Tiktok and some members here should reciprocate a sober clearheadedness in kind towards recognizing what is really at stake in the eyes of the US state.
If national interest is really what is the reason, US government would not be taken hostage by Israel. As the one delivering ammo for free, that is a lot of leverages. The only rational explanation is they act on behalf of their donors.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
100% agree. I would definitely like to see more asssertive approach from China when it comes to diplomacy/foreign policy. I observe that China is always defending itself against the baseless accusations coming from US/EU. Never does China try to launch diplomatic attacks on the West despite having plenty of ammunition to do so. Why not draft UN resolution condemning illegal US occupation of Syria for example ?

Also I would add that in my view China cannot be considered a superpower until Taiwan province question has been resolved once and for all.
Imagine if the President of China can express an honest appraisal of what's happening in Gaza like this Malaysian P.M. recently did while on official visit to Germany.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Imagine if the President of China can express an honest appraisal of what's happening in Gaza like this Malaysian P.M. recently did while on official visit to Germany.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I want to hear Modi, Marcos, Sisi and King Abdula reaction they will perform a splendid mental gymnastic routine never seen and heard before....lol
 
Top