Miscellaneous News

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
After

I wonder if this recent leadership shake up In the Philippines Military is maybe tangentially related to that American strategy. As soon as President Marcos Jr. came back from his state visit to China, he sacked/replaced the now former AFP Chief of Staff after having only served on this role and was appointed by Marcos Jr. himself 5 months or so ago. The replacement officer is the same officer who was replaced by the now outgoing and replaced officer. Kind of confusing decision. But there has been a strong and persistent rumour alleging that there's a "destabilization plot" a.k.a. MILITARY Coup against Marcos Jr.



The question to be aske here is why? What would be the motivation of that country's Armed Forces to militarily oust the recently elected President and with the biggest mandate at that, having been elected by the most votes in the history of that island country. I can't help but be suspicious of a strong pro-American faction within the Armed forces of the Philippines. Since most of their top officers go to the U.S. military educational and training institutions during their formative years, and must have been groomed, targeted by American intelligence organization as their assets to be used in a just in case scenarios.


The person speaking on the video linked above is a former Senator, a former AFP Chief who loves to call for his fellow military officers to be apolitical at all times and yet this man never seem to shy away from making political comments and intrigues especially with respect to the current President and against Duterte. I was watching this same person on a different video on youtube but could not seem to find that anymore in which he was essentially suggesting and hinting that maybe there's more than meets the eye with regards to the decision to replace a newly minted with the one who was just himself replaced.

@ansy1968 What's going on with your country bud.
The question is why not a coup? Countries under us sphere get couped more than not couped. He beat a more pro us candidate so a coup is certain. He is a fool if I can see it he cant.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Yes, this is what I'm talking about. Average people will probably not need multivariable calculus, so additional math education at a secondary school level should probably concentrate on practical applications such as personal finance.

I don't know what high school you went to, but I learned calculus in University, not high school.

High school math was just algebra and geometry.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't know what high school you went to, but I learned calculus in University, not high school.

High school math was just algebra and geometry.

Calculus is part of the curriculum for 17-18 year old high school students who do Maths in the UK.
And I would agree calculus is excessive and not required for the average student.

And from personal experience, I would agree that additional maths for 18 year olds in the UK should focus on practical applications such personal finance and being able to do basic mental arithmetic instantly.

One of the results will be a population which instinctively asks "where is the data" and "show me the numbers" whenever a decision needs to be made, which is a good thing.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Also, many Lawyers/MBAs/Bankers/Salespeople are people who have sci-tech backgrounds, but are financially incentivized to use their skills to “develop” cryptocurrencies, derivative assets, patent litigation, etc.

I think you need to scratch lawyers off that list.
How many lawyers or law students do you know who have sci-tech backgrounds?

Wiki entry below for reference

"In 2001, the five most common majors of students entering law school were political science, history, English, psychology, and criminal justice.[1]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-law
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Maybe he's an old fart that went to high school during the time there are OAC classes
I did
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
To clarify, multivariable calculus was a university course. However, yes, I did take OAC calculus in high school.
I guess I am pretty old, lol

Also remember the background was how necessary math is to the end of secondary school. Most math at the 17-18 age is University prep (algebra, vectors, calculus). If the desired outcome of Sunak's proposal is to educate society as a whole, then that stuff would be overkill.

I think you need to scratch lawyers off that list.
How many lawyers or law students do you know who have sci-tech backgrounds?

Wiki entry below for reference

"In 2001, the five most common majors of students entering law school were political science, history, English, psychology, and criminal justice.[1]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-law

I think there are quite a few patent troll lawyers that have those backgrounds, of course I've never investigated it, but just from news articles. Of course my main point is sci-tech grads being unproductive and reminding how patent litigation/strong IP laws are promoted as "fostering innovation", when most of the time it is the opposite.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Calculus is part of the curriculum for 17-18 year old high school students who do Maths in the UK.
That explains all the fuss around it. Calculus is taught in the 1st year in university in China. Recently some high schools in China put it in their senior years as an option/introduction, but it is not part of the official curriculum.

Not intending to brag, but it does look weird that UK has Calculus in their high school while even east Asian countries do not who are strong in math education. Maybe UK puts the effort in the wrong place in the wrong time. I think Sunank maybe is doing the right thing.
 
Top