Miscellaneous News

bajingan

Senior Member
Looks like South Korea need to be taught a very important lesson, in that South Koreans must learn how to:
1. Respect China's position as the dominant power in the region;
2. Respect China's soverignity and integrity; and
3. Respect the Chinese people and the Chinese civilization state.


That said, if the South Koreans really do wish to interfere in China's internal affairs, then China should grant them their wish by annexing both Koreas and unify them under the direct rule of Beijing as the 33rd province of the PRC.
SK involvement in TW strait crisis even if it only rear support, will trigger Article 2 of the China-DPRK Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance (the two nations undertake all necessary measures to oppose any country or coalition of countries that might attack either nation)

Given the possibility of NK joining the fray its highly unlikely SK will risk it
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
I agree that focusing on obscure grammar peculiarities not useful. But I also want to say:

Native English speakers do learn formal grammar, they just tend to forget most of it because it doesn't matter. Grammar recorded down in books and used to teach classes are fossilized version of a language - dead and static - unlike the constantly shifting and changing nature of a spoken language. This is made all the worse by how far out of date grammatical rules taught from books are. So when conflicts inevitably rise between the forms penned down and the forms flowing from the mouths of their peers (native practitioners), it's easy to see why natives forget the formal rules they learn. Grammar is defined by the people who natively speak it, not by rules dictated from beyond the grave. "Don't end a sentence with a preposition" is one of those rules from a book written centuries ago - who, incidentally, made the rule up whole-cloth because they wanted English to be more Latin-like.

Case in point: when I took the SAT “his or her” is the correct way to address someone of unspecified gender. Nowadays “their” is correct.
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
India and its elites have revealed their envious hand as wanting to be the eternal sepoys of the Anglo 'rules based order'. At least Bolsonaro's Brazil saw the need for balance since he eventually re-connected with the BRICS and didnt ditch Huawei. It was a good thing that BRICS+ is now a thing at Chinese chairmanship since the introduction of Egypt, Iran, Saudi will neutralise India's already treasonous attitude and enforce the will of the global South.

The Australian continent cannot be ignored with its rich resources and agricultural land; better to have the demographics tilted towards Chinese rather than the already burgeoning indian immigrants trying to get their cousins into australia so they can form ethnic fiefdoms as was seen in Oracle and Twitter.

In fact, the racists "Swamped by Asians" White Australia Policy crowd have never stopped harping on about how more Chinese voters are going to influence elections- because it just happened at the most recent election where Chinese voters destroyed the sinophobic Liberal Party in favour of the more conciliatory Labor Party. Currently, the US CIA aim is to depose the current Labor leader if he doesnt show enough anti China prostration after Foreign Minister Penny Wong just visited China.
I heard FMA did something clever with Penny Wong's visit and recommended her to stay at Zhongnanhai, an honour usually reserved for either heads of state or very close friends like Pakistan FM, and Penny Wong actually went through with it.

I think FMA's strategy is to use her ancestry and her special treatment to sow discord within the Five Eyes in a spot of 反奸计.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Hate to see it but Chinese visitors are coming to Australia in huge numbers again. Pre covid Chinese spend huge sums in aus on education, property, shopping, tourism, accommodation etc. It didnt earn any positive Pro China sentiment at all. Instead year by year there is increasing anti China sinophobic feelings in gov, media and population. Hopefully this time Chinese learn their lesson.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Australian continent cannot be ignored with its rich resources and agricultural land; better to have the demographics tilted towards Chinese rather than the already burgeoning indian immigrants trying to get their cousins into australia so they can form ethnic fiefdoms as was seen in Oracle and Twitter.

In fact, the racists "Swamped by Asians" White Australia Policy crowd have never stopped harping on about how more Chinese voters are going to influence elections- because it just happened at the most recent election where Chinese voters destroyed the sinophobic Liberal Party in favour of the more conciliatory Labor Party. Currently, the US CIA aim is to depose the current Labor leader if he doesnt show enough anti China prostration after Foreign Minister Penny Wong just visited China.
I would like to add something.

There is this phrase which holds true for quite a lot of situations: 谁会跟钱过不去?

Despite being 10 months into the war in Ukraine (and also the start of the absolute worsening of EU-Russia relations), EU countries are still importing Russian oil to this day. Meanwhile, Russia is still happily earning that sweet oil and gas export revenue from EU:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Therefore, if China-Australia relations didn't degrade to become as bad as EU-Russia relations, then why should China limit the amount of trade with Australia unilaterally?

Besides, compared to the previous ScoMo's administration which were doing hot-headed anti-China ranting pretty much every single day, the current Albanese administration is relatively level-headed and less belligerent when it comes to China-Australia affairs. This is despite the recent anti-China moves, such as Australia preparing Tindal Air Base near Darwin to house B-52 bombers.

As far as I can recall, despite being the Prime Minister of Australia for 4 years, ScoMo has never once invited Xi for a state visit to Australia, or even considering to hold a face-to-face summit between both state leaders on the sidelines of multinational summits in a third country.

In fact, the only time ScoMo and Xi actually met each other was during the G20 summit in Osaka in 2019, and that was only done as a brief, 5/10-minutes-ish chat.
r0_0_1017_538_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg

Meanwhile, Albanese had a official face-to-face summit with Xi on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Bali barely 6 months after he becomes the Prime Minister of Australia:
W020221116034520280417.jpg

I think this shows that compared to the ScoMo administration, the Albanese administration does portray more willingness and openness to engage with China, at least on the diplomatic frontier. Perhaps it is rather evident that China-Australia tensions has cooled down somewhat, and that the icing on the Beijing-Canberra relations has thawed somewhat - Even if that's only for a little bit.

Therefore, if and when Canberra do offer Beijing chances that would promote further thawing of tensions and warming of relations between the two countries, I believe Beijing should not be reluctant to accept the offer, despite the rapidly growing animousity between the people of the two countries.
 
Last edited:
Top