I guess they thought the very-well-documented "snakehead" smuggling and plight of undocumented migrant workers were fake news.
In either case, China's support to Russia is unlikely to be direct arms transfers. It's going to be economic/industrial assistance in situation 1 and I don't know what in situation 2.
That may be stated intent of NATO but so far little proof of significant Russian losses.In my opinion, the NATO scenario is to destroy conventional Russian forces in Ukraine, including Crimea, which will cause massive discontent in Russia and the overthrow of Putin. I think NATO already has a scenario for a Russian Maidan after the Russian army is defeated in Ukraine and installing a puppet after Putin.
On that note, a few days ago I came across this thread on Twitter from a Chinese perspective.
You should read the whole thread:
Russia with its very educated people can be a very good research partner for China. It would be very beneficial for Russia too. They have to diversify their economy. Post-soviet Russia couldn't use that human capital but it exists.There has been much talk on Chinese (and HK) internet that Russia and China have reached some sort of agreement for China to invest in eastern Siberia particularly regarding agriculture and industries. Russia has no one but China, and there is no turning back (towards the west) for them, while China gets ample natural resources.
This has been talked about for years, but given current conditions, it might be true this time. Nothing official yet, let's hope we hear something soon.
Russians have some of the smartest people on the planet, but they won't be using that human capital to full capacity anytime soon as long as cronyism and corruption remain endemic issues. Google and Telegram could've been Russian companies, rather than simply being founded by Russian expats. Not to mention, since the war started millions of Russian tech workers have already fled overseas and as long as Russia remains the way it is, they're probably not likely to come back.Russia with its very educated people can be a very good research partner for China. It would be very beneficial for Russia too. They have to diversify their economy. Post-soviet Russia couldn't use that human capital but it exists.
View attachment 104109
Is any other language still relevant in geopolitics today? Japanese is completely irrelevant.The PRC ambassador to the USA, Qin Gang, has been appointed as successor to Wang Yi as the new Minister of Foreign Affairs of the PRC.
It is also said that Wang Yi will not retire from his government job. As one of the 24 members of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, Wang Yi is expected to succeed Yang Jiechi (i.e. Tiger Yang) as China's de facto top diplomat.
Does Qin Gang speak any language(s) other than Chinese and English? For Wang Yi, that would be Japanese.
During the first 11 months of this year, South Korea's energy imports spiked $74.8 billion on-year to $174.1 billion on high energy prices.
KEPCO logged a record high net loss of 21.83 trillion won for the January-September period, and the figure for the whole of 2022 is expected to surpass 30 trillion won. Last year, the company reported a net loss of 1.12 trillion won.
This is not correct way at look at things. Telegram better stayed around UAE. That broaden its appeal.Russians have some of the smartest people on the planet, but they won't be using that human capital to full capacity anytime soon as long as cronyism and corruption remain endemic issues. Google and Telegram could've been Russian companies, rather than simply being founded by Russian expats. Not to mention, since the war started millions of Russian tech workers have already fled overseas and as long as Russia remains the way it is, they're probably not likely to come back.
Of course, the pandemic was not in vain, it made its own adjustments, and life expectancy today is about 77 years, but even by this value we are third in the country after Ingushetia and Dagestan - regions, traditionally related to centenarians," she said.