Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Bellum_Romanum said:
I have no interest reading drivel from an academic bought and paid for the lying hypocrites best practiced and exemplified by America and her western lackeys.

What this supposed scholar lacks is actual common sense. Russia was given the permanent council seat since the Russian state was and is the strongest member of the former Soviet Union. The exercise and concentration of power was held in Moscow the capital of Soviet Union now Russia. Russia possessed then as in now the strongest military in the region, possesses the largest NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Not to mention Russian blood, sweat and tears suffered the most in killing off the Nazi war machine in WWII.

Which country are they going to passed the mantle of UN seat to? Georgia? Chechnya? Kazakhstan? Azerbaijan? These people thinks the whole world are full of dumb gullible cucks that will swallow every lies they spew....

What a useless, pathetic dumb woman. She is just another USELESS virtue signaling HACK who wants to score and gain points from the Imperial powers in Washington D.C.
Click to expand...
This is on the same level of idiocy as those Indians who said that India under Nehru 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China. As if it was ever India's to give. These people could never imagine that Russia and China earned their UNSC Veto power because of their immense sacrifice during WW2. Unlike the US, Britain, and France, who suffered much less in WW2. Unlike India, who was still a colony of the British during that era, and had not suffered anything close to what Russia and China went through.
 
A

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Sardaukar20 said:
This is on the same level of idiocy as those Indians who said that India under Nehru 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China. As if it was ever India's to give. These people could never imagine that Russia and China earned their UNSC Veto power because of their immense sacrifice during WW2. Unlike the US, Britain, and France, who suffered much less in WW2. Unlike India, who was still a colony of the British during that era, and had not suffered anything close to what Russia and China went through.
Click to expand...
Exactly.

In fact, China's return to the United Nations and the UNSC was voted by the UNGC members with a majority of 75 "aye" votes versus a minority of 35 "nay" votes for UNGA Resolution 2758.

When I see Indians on the internet being estatic and even having orgasm to the mention that China should lose her UNSC permanent seat, or the notion of India replacing China's seat on the UNSC is pure hilarious and ridiculous.

China - "Paid" for the victory in the Second World War AND one of the five permanent seats in the UNSC - With 25 MILLION CHINESE LIVES.

25 MILLION CHINESE PEOPLE'S BLOOD

Seriously, those ignorant f00ls from that subcontinent should just shut their own arses up.
 
Last edited:
GZDRefugee

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
This - versus - Indian OSINT tweeters bragging about the Indian troops allegedly "mauling" Chinese troops with bats lined with nails and laced with wires that is connected to a battery pack - Showcased and further proofed one important point: China likes to keep things silent and hidden; India likes to talk big and brags a lot.
Click to expand...
Very cultural, I'm afraid. Anyone who's worked with Indians would notice the amount of ass kissing and exaggerated accolades they spout off incessantly. Meanwhile, Chinese just get shit done.

If you do ever work with Indians, make sure to have a paper trail of all your contributions so nobody can claim credit for your work.
 
FriedButter

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Denmark drops (1 public) holiday (of 11) to beef up military spending​

Denmark’s newly-formed coalition government has opted to do away with one of the country’s 11 public holidays to help reach NATO’s annual defense spend target of 2% of GDP, despite criticism from religious Danes.

“There is war in Europe, and we need to strengthen our defenses,” Prime Minister Mette Fredriksen explained on Thursday when asked why she was scrapping the holiday on the new government’s first day in power. “That will require everyone to contribute a little more.” She said she hoped the measure would boost productivity and economic activity.

Meeting NATO’s spending target three years ahead of schedule is one of the top priorities of the coalition government, which took power on Thursday. Comprised of the center-right Liberal Party and the centrist Moderates in addition to Fredriksen’s center-left Social Democrats, the coalition is Denmark's first in nearly half a century to include parties from both sides of the political
Click to expand...

el-risitas-juan-joya-borja.gif
 
D

duncanidaho

Junior Member
Sardaukar20 said:
This is on the same level of idiocy as those Indians who said that India under Nehru 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China. As if it was ever India's to give. These people could never imagine that Russia and China earned their UNSC Veto power because of their immense sacrifice during WW2. Unlike the US, Britain, and France, who suffered much less in WW2. Unlike India, who was still a colony of the British during that era, and had not suffered anything close to what Russia and China went through.
Click to expand...

That is indian vedic logic! The UN-Charta was signed on June 26th 1945 and came into force an October 24th 1945, India became independent on August 15th 1947 with Nehru as its prime minister! So Nehru could 'gifted' the UNSC Veto power seat to China two years before the independence of India and before he came into power!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top