Miscellaneous News

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please leave "Taiwan Independence" out of this thread! I will only post this one reply on this subject and no more follow ups.

It's irrelevant, and the most things I am hearing from you guys are simply juvenile. You guys model Taiwan as a single person. Taiwan is not a person, it's a society politically organized by a parliamentary democratic system. Perhaps you guys should really treat a parliamentary democratic system objectively and materialistically. The number one driving force and motive of politics in a democratic parliamentary system is to earn votes. Why do you treat this society as if it's run by a unified ego? You should look at the political parties in Taiwan, what they are look after, and most importantly why they sort after what they sort after!

The DPP is the ruling party right now, and it was born largely as a result of people's negative reaction towards the KMT's fascistic militaristic rule in Taiwan. Therefore, DPP's "Taiwan Independence" was NEVER originally an anti-CPC creature, it was an anti-KMT creature. The DPP strives to be everything the KMT is not, many DPP leaders were left-leaning, or even joined communist movements in their early years, against the KMT. As a political party, their real main competitor is the KMT, every anti-CPC action is essential an anti-KMT action in disguise for the DPP.

There is NO reason for them to really set the CPC against them, because that will harm their own superiority against the KMT in Taiwan. They will keep up the superficially anti-CPC stance on the exterior, just to keep the rhetoric consistent. But they are NOT stupid enough to be blind to the OBVIOUS fact that the US ONLY wants them to be expendable acids, a tool to use against PRC. They (DPP leadership and elites) will NOT sacrifice their good peaceful life, their "developed world living standards", and their political triumph over the KMT, in exchange for a real war with PRC, which will turn Taiwan into a wasteland, EVEN IF the PLA loses such war.The is very simple game theory.

Sure, the DPP will have 'nominal independence" afterwards, but it really does not feel much different for the average people. But if they ended up a ruled, bombed-to-smithereens wasteland, with all their wealth effectively gone, do you think the DPP party elites will thing it's worth it? And this is only considering the best case scenario for them: no nuclear war, no actual (even partial) occupation by PLA, AND they somehow win the war. And certainly no Ukrainian-like-idiocy where they think they can get enough war reparation to rebuild from nuclear-armed power, because that's a bullshit point not worth talking about, because the sheer loss of population, lives as well as infrastructure would be detrimental and far beyond any realistic reparation can fix.

This is why there will be no real "Formal Taiwan Independence" as long as the DPP and Taiwan is in healthy economic shape. The US can pretty much give up trying to trick the Taiwanese into being a expendable acid against the PRC. If the US really want to use Taiwan as a tool, they need to obliterate Taiwanese economy, turn them into a cornered, hopeless poor shithole first. And then, the Americans might find enough desperate people and politicians in Taiwan will to risk anything for a "US economic aid" or "formal alliance treaty with the USA" which will alleviate their dire poverty.

However, you will NOT see this happening any time soon in our timeline.

Okey, I will say no more on this topic. Mod, if you don't like this post, please delete it!
 
Last edited:

plawolf

Lieutenant General
"Days at most" for the entire force? That seems ridiculous, but I have been wondering how long is needed. Observing the Russian buildup, and taking into account the amphibious context, I was guessing that at least 3-4 weeks would be needed from the day the decision is made, before all forces are ready in Fujian, even if they were trying to mobilize as quickly as possible. The exception might be if maybe there were preceding signs of independence or something so they prepositioned a portion already, then perhaps just assembling the rest and getting the fleet into position wouldn't take quite as long.

And what makes you think it needs the PLA that length of time? What precisely do they need 3-4 weeks to do?
 

clockwork

Junior Member
Registered Member
And what makes you think it needs the PLA that length of time? What precisely do they need 3-4 weeks to do?
I don't think anyone serious believes the PLA can muster the force needed to take Taiwan in anything like the order of time you suggested lol. 3 weeks would be the absolute most optimistic estimate. Look at how long the Coalition needed to build up before invading Iraq too, both of those were far easier LAND INVASIONS. Just sailing all the ships needed to ferry the amphibious force over will take time. They need to move all the 071/075/LCACs there, amphibious fighting vehicles, logistics, etc. etc. This would be on the scale of D-Day.
 

Coalescence

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please leave "Taiwan Independence" out of this thread! I will only post this one reply on this subject and no more follow ups.

It's irrelevant, and the most things I am hearing from you guys are simply juvenile. You guys model Taiwan as a single person. Taiwan is not a person, it's a society politically organized by a parliamentary democratic system. Perhaps you guys should really treat a parliamentary democratic system objectively and materialistically. The number one driving force and motive of politics in a democratic parliamentary system is to earn votes. Why do you treat this society as if it's run by a unified ego? You should look at the political parties in Taiwan, what they are look after, and most importantly why they sort after what they sort after!

The DPP is the ruling party right now, and it was born largely as a result of people's negative reaction towards the KMT's fascistic militaristic rule in Taiwan. Therefore, "Taiwan Independence" was NEVER originally an anti-CPC creature, it was an anti-KMT creature. The DPP strives to be everything the KMT is not, many DPP leaders were left-leaning, or even joined communist movements in their early years, against the KMT. As a political party, their real main competitor is the KMT, every anti-CPC action is essential an anti-KMT action in disguise for the DPP.

There is NO reason for them to really set the CPC against them, because that will harm their own superiority against the KMT in Taiwan. They will keep up the superficially anti-CPC stance on the exterior, just to keep the rhetoric consistent. But they are NOT stupid enough to be blind to the OBVIOUS fact that the US ONLY wants them to be expendable acids, a tool to use against PRC. They (DPP leadership and elites) will NOT sacrifice their good peaceful life, their "developed world living standards", and their political triumph over the KMT, in exchange for a real war with PRC, which will turn Taiwan into a wasteland, EVEN IF the PLA loses such war.The is very simple game theory.

Sure, the DPP will have 'nominal independence" afterwards, but it really does not feel much different for the average people. But if they ended up a ruled, bombed-to-smithereens wasteland, with all their wealth effectively gone, do you think the DPP party elites will thing it's worth it? And this is only considering the best case scenario for them: no nuclear war, no actual (even partial) occupation by PLA, AND they somehow win the war. And certainly no Ukrainian-like-idiocy where they think they can get enough war reparation to rebuild from nuclear-armed power, because that's a bullshit point not worth talking about, because the sheer loss of population, lives as well as infrastructure would be detrimental and far beyond any realistic reparation can fix.

This is why there will be no real "Formal Taiwan Independence" as long as the DPP and Taiwan is in healthy economic shape. The US can pretty much give up trying to trick the Taiwanese into being a expendable acid against the PRC. If the US really want to use Taiwan as a tool, they need to obliterate Taiwanese economy, turn them into a cornered, hopeless poor shithole first. And then, the Americans might find enough desperate people and politicians in Taiwan will to risk anything for a "US economic aid" or "formal alliance treaty with the USA" which will alleviate their dire poverty.

However, you will NOT see this happening any time soon in our timeline.

Okey, I will say no more on this topic. Mod, if you don't like this post, please delete it!
Well written! but what I'm afraid of is if the Taiwan side isn't going to initiate the trigger, US would try other means to make the condition ripe like doing a regime change or grassroots revolution. Though if what you said is true, there could be a possibility when things are nearing the tipping point, the DPP may do a below the table deal with the CPC to defuse the situation, maybe the terms will be to denounce US for intervening in domestic politics or cutting out deals with US for military weapons. Its better to keep the status quo frozen, there's no need to rile up unnecessary tensions for the benefit of a third party.

But another factor to consider, is what does the decision makers in the mainland think. I remember Xi saying he won't leave the Taiwan question to be solved for future generations, so that there makes me afraid of an possibility of an armed reunification whether Taiwan or US pushes for it or not.
 
Last edited:

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Well to divert on the Taiwan topic. We got this from a US senator.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Biden ally (US Senator) floats idea of US troops in Ukraine​

Senator suggest Ukraine may ‘turn into Syria,’ unless the US and NATO ‘stop Putin’

US Senator Chris Coons (D-Delaware), a politician described by media outlets as President Joe Biden’s closest Senate ally, has raised the idea of deploying American troops to fight Russians in Ukraine, saying he fears the former Soviet republic will “become the Syria of Eastern Europe.

Coons worked as an intern in Biden’s Senate office in the 1990s and was elected to fill his former Senate seat in 2010. He was described by the New York Times as “Biden’s eyes and ears in the Senate,” while Politico called him “the Biden whisperer.”Media outlets
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
him a “shadow secretary of state” after the White House sent him on a diplomatic mission to Ethiopia last year.

The senator’s latest comments come three days after he said the Biden administration and US lawmakers need to discuss parameters for troop deployments to Ukraine. Speaking at an event at the University of Michigan, he
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that if direct military involvement is ruled out, “we are inviting another level of escalation in brutality by Putin.”

Like Biden, Coons has previously
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
against sending American forces to Ukraine. He seldom, if ever, contradicts Biden’s views, so his change of rhetoric raised
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over what the commander-in-chief might be considering.


Coons added that “autocrats around the world” – from North Korea to Iran to China – are closely watching the US and NATO response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. He also called the crisis a “1939 moment,”apparently alluding to Nazi Germany’s early conquests in Europe.
It would appear the US neocon establish is panicking. Coons was against sending US troops but now he is backing it.

May be worth keeping an eye on. Coons was a former Biden intern in 1990s and is the senator for Biden former senate seat.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I don't think anyone serious believes the PLA can muster the force needed to take Taiwan in anything like the order of time you suggested lol. 3 weeks would be the absolute most optimistic estimate. Look at how long the Coalition needed to build up before invading Iraq too, both of those were far easier LAND INVASIONS. Just sailing all the ships needed to ferry the amphibious force over will take time. They need to move all the 071/075/LCACs there, amphibious fighting vehicles, logistics, etc. etc. This would be on the scale of D-Day.

Last I checked, Iraq wasn’t 200miles off the US coast. And just where do you think all the 071/075/LSTs and other amphibious assets are based that they need 3 weeks to get to Taiwan? New York?

Ever wonder why the lion share of the PLAN is parked in port and not on active deployment? Hint, this is why. The PLAN, PLA and PLAAF keep a significant proportion of their forces at high readiness states close at home precisely because they need to be able to move on Taiwan at the shortest possible time.

Unlike the west, China has no global military commitment beyond UN peacekeeping missions and anti-piracy patrols. Neither of which puts any pressure on the forces it needs for a Taiwan scenario.

Again, you cite this 3 weeks, but what is this based on exactly?
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Wedding photographer sentenced to 14 years in prison for providing hundreds of photos of warships and military ports to a person overseas

…after he was found providing 384 photos of Chinese warships and military ports to a person overseas that he met via WeChat…
The photos involved elements of three most confidential state secrets and two classified state secrets. The photographer received a payment of over 40,000 yuan ($6,280) for these pictures.
Another typical case pointed to a college student who got acquainted with a foreign person using the name “Han” on a dating app. From March to July 2020, the student visited military ports and other military bases on multiple times to take pictures and shared them with Han through WeChat and other social apps.

The student was “rewarded” with over 10,000 yuan ($1,570) and a Casio watch, among other gifts. He was sentenced to six years in prison.
Another defendant surnamed Wu, was the operation commander at the department of aviation and operation management at an airport. He was reached by an agent of a spy organization who seduced him to provide the itineraries of important figures of government bodies. Wu was sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment.

There was an argument to remove the firewall a little while back and how we don’t have the “credentials” to question him and how we should blindly trust fellow citizens.

More examples on exactly why we shouldn’t remove it.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





There was an argument to remove the firewall a little while back and how we don’t have the “credentials” to question him and how we should blindly trust fellow citizens.

More examples on exactly why we shouldn’t remove it.
He/she should've be sentenced to life imprisonment. His/her personal properties should also be confiscated by the state, and his/her family members heavily penalized for his crimes.

By working with foreign spies, he/she has condemned himself/herself as traitors, i.e. Hanjians. And Hanjians are a cancer to the Chinese diasphora, and should be eliminated at any costs to ensure the survival of the Chinese people.

And this should give stern enough warning to anyone who dares to commit similar crimes of spying/spying on behalf of foreign operatives.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
He/she should've be sentenced to life imprisonment. His personal properties would also be confiscated by the state, and his family members heavily penalized.

Penalizing family members who are uninvolved is excessive and unnecessary. It will only breed resentment. You can ask the people in the Middle East when the US wiped their family out because they may or may not be involved.
 
Top