I know the mapmaybe look at a transport map of Russia.
I know the mapmaybe look at a transport map of Russia.
The US forget that this would make China the true hegemon who can settle a crisis between US and Russia. This is contrary to what US has been trying to prevent from happening. Of course, US leadership never look beyond their shadow.
US is provoking armed conflicts between the neighbours of China and Russia with China and Russia. US will never step in, never after Iraq and Afghanistan.Why is America trying to provoke an armed conflict with Russia and China when according to Col. Douglas MacGregor (ret.) of Battle of 73 Easting fame 1st Gulf War, said that only 30% of Americans between the ages of 18-24 are qualified to serve in the US military? Who's going to man all those fancy weapons they have? It seems that the lack of quality manpower has severely affected the quality of their hardwares in terms of maintenance etc...
I'm literally from the place directly above Mongolia. The local infrastructure there absolutely cannot support a full-scale invasion - it is an extremely sparsely populated area with a crap climate. There are only two main railroads there (Transsib and BAM) - Transsib has exactly two branches (through Ulan-Ude and Ulan-Baatar, another one is through Chita) that can lead to China, BAM has one (Vladivostok). Destroying those is not an exactly hard task, not to mention that the average speeds on those rails are 40-50 km/h. Mongolia is even "better", it has exactly one railroad - yeah, the one from Ulan-Ude through Ulan-Baatar to Beijing.No.. The Mongolia and siberia route is logistcally feasible and they will first consolidate the territory and will also be able to transfer from two axes points which is Europe and thru Alaska slowly hence it is feasible roads and railway connectivity is present in Russia..
If they come from the seas they will be destroyed and china's bulk is there they have zero chance there
Siberia, land so shitty and inhospitable, even the Mongols didn't want, and they wanted the entire world.I'm literally from the place directly above Mongolia. The local infrastructure there absolutely cannot support a full-scale invasion - it is an extremely sparsely populated area with a crap climate. There are only two main railroads there (Transsib and BAM) - Transsib has exactly two branches (through Ulan-Ude and Ulan-Baatar, another one is through Chita) that can lead to China, BAM has one (Vladivostok). Destroying those is not an exactly hard task, not to mention that the average speeds on those rails are 40-50 km/h. Mongolia is even "better", it has exactly one railroad - yeah, the one from Ulan-Ude through Ulan-Baatar to Beijing.
That's not even mentioning paved roads - they are extremely scarce in Mongolia and they degrade quickly in Siberia\Far East due to large temperature gradients. Going through dirt roads or "wilderness" is going to reduce the average speeds of supply convoys to laughable levels, draining a lot of resources to simply protect them.
I'm literally from the place directly above Mongolia. The local infrastructure there absolutely cannot support a full-scale invasion - it is an extremely sparsely populated area with a crap climate. There are only two main railroads there (Transsib and BAM) - Transsib has exactly two branches (through Ulan-Ude and Ulan-Baatar, another one is through Chita) that can lead to China, BAM has one (Vladivostok). Destroying those is not an exactly hard task, not to mention that the average speeds on those rails are 40-50 km/h. Mongolia is even "better", it has exactly one railroad - yeah, the one from Ulan-Ude through Ulan-Baatar to Beijing.
That's not even mentioning paved roads - they are extremely scarce in Mongolia and they degrade quickly in Siberia\Far East due to large temperature gradients. Going through dirt roads or "wilderness" is going to reduce the average speeds of supply convoys to laughable levels, draining a lot of resources to simply protect them.
Rampant morbid obesity, drug addiction and criminal records severely reduce the pool of potential recruits. You also need a minimum IQ of 83 to join US military, which rules out rather more potential recruits than you'd think.Why is America trying to provoke an armed conflict with Russia and China when according to Col. Douglas MacGregor (ret.) of Battle of 73 Easting fame 1st Gulf War, said that only 30% of Americans between the ages of 18-24 are qualified to serve in the US military? Who's going to man all those fancy weapons they have? It seems that the lack of quality manpower has severely affected the quality of their hardwares in terms of maintenance etc...
Well the U.S. Army to best of my knowledge and at least according to what even Gen.Clark (NATO SACEUR) said echoing what McGregor has mentioned that they have even lowered the qualifications so that they can hit their target recruitment record of at least 62,000..which means qualitatively the U.S. military as a whole is not getting the best of her people but some of the worst. And to think that they're going to be match against a very determined and well trained military that is either Russia or China? I don't mean to be dismissive but the US don't stand a lick of chance of winning period.Rampant morbid obesity, drug addiction and criminal records severely reduce the pool of potential recruits. You also need a minimum IQ of 83 to join US military, which rules out rather more potential recruits than you'd think.