Chinese central committe is the same, so?
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
I am versed in military tactics The US won't strike out of nowhere nor is China top of the list and it has something to do with logistics. The US Like any other rising power want to etbalish next world order as the leaders and shape the world in their image..
1. The US WW3 doctrine is based on punching right thru Russia like a hurricane before finishing it with China in a direct ground slush nuke assault this is logistically possible not saying they can pull it off but theorically speaking it is feasible but practically you will fight determined foes it will depend on tactics and intelligence gathering.. The one whos more prepared will win hence not discounting anyone and could be anyways fight but if they come from taiwan strait they will be crushed but not if they come from Siberia and Mongolia direction they will be able to fight china at their doorsteps on a equal footing logistically..
2. I don't think the US is ready for war but they will be in preparation mode for the next 2 decades.. The punch will come right thru Russia mark my words hence Russia knows this about their posturing and tactical manuvers hence Russia wants to redirect them somewhere else but that is their home and head-base they have nowhere to go hence Russia is stuck with them and the entire current beef is about this
Last edited:
“The only trench the Americans will be storming is the Mariana Trench.”
It amusing for me to say this in my head from time to time.
There is next to no infrastructure to support large logistic lines in Siberia and Mongolia, lol, while China can easily move troops to the north. The only feasible option is the seas because they have established supply lines in their vassal states but these territories also host the bulk of the Chinese military. Attacking from the Indian side is impossible due to terrain, Central Asia is another logistics nightmare that is going to get quickly filled with radical militant groups if the governments there fall.
In case people get confused we should remember one thing, anything that enters the SCS is destined to be destroyed in case any hostilities happen.
Forget the whole SCS fantasy thing. The debate happening now is all about the 2nd island chain. And even there, China is rapidly increasing its capabilities each year.
The US and its delusional think tankers should delete the word SCS from their vocabulary. The more carriers they send there, the better for China because it can easily destroy them when they are anywhere inside the 1st island chain
Forget the whole SCS fantasy thing. The debate happening now is all about the 2nd island chain. And even there, China is rapidly increasing its capabilities each year.
The US and its delusional think tankers should delete the word SCS from their vocabulary. The more carriers they send there, the better for China because it can easily destroy them when they are anywhere inside the 1st island chain
Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia: The Baltic small dwarfs, the loudest yapping American lapdogs
Having the Baltic tinies around are really like when you buy chihuahuas and they keep on yapping the neighbor's pit bulls looking for troubles.
Having the Baltic tinies around are really like when you buy chihuahuas and they keep on yapping the neighbor's pit bulls looking for troubles.
No.. The Mongolia and siberia route is logistcally feasible and they will first consolidate the territory and will also be able to transfer from two axes points which is Europe and thru Alaska slowly hence it is feasible roads and railway connectivity is present in Russia..
If they come from the seas they will be destroyed and china's bulk is there they have zero chance there
Last edited:
maybe look at a transport map of Russia.
I need to visit Uyghurland. I miss the kebab skewers there
Cool story, meanwhile the reality.
Pink is Grand Duchy of Lithuania during the Union of Poland and Lithuania.
Before Commonwealth.
During Commonwealth.
