Miscellaneous News

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
You would call me a hawk but she should go to jail for causing such damage to China's image

The guy should also sue her for slander. And thus force to reveal her if she has any actual proof for her accusations

She could have gone to a court and sue the guy, but instead she decided to open her mouth to the world and cause this mess
She never accused him of rape though as implied and concucted by the western propaganda outlets like the NYT. The overall angle in my opinion was to create so much noise and damage in the western world (not the WORLD) to put enough public pressure resulting from their woke and vacuous public to demand western governments to forego attending the Beijing Winter Olympics that's it. Because we all know the grand ceremony on this upcoming Olympics will yet again showcase to the western world and the rest of the World who don't play winter sports that China’s time has come and there's no stopping the Dragon. The impact of shock and awe and the pivotal realization that China has arrived could be similar to the effect of the 2008 Summer Olympic games in Beijing. That opening ceremony DID A LOT TO CHINA’S SOFT POWER that so many of us seems to be obsessing about on this thread and rightfully so.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
What a nice PR
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Quote:
Separately, at least a dozen employees or contractors at the mine told The Times that Chinese ownership had led to a drastic decline in safety and an increase in injuries, many of which were not reported to management. Two Congolese safety officers said workers were assaulted after they raised concerns and were offered bribes to cover up accidents.
Well that's some specific accusations. They could easily be investigated and checked if true

If true, then the top executives should go to jail, compensation to the workers/injuries and public apology

These neocolonial practises should not be used by Chinese companies
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Given the amount of hard power China has achieved over the last 40 years, it should have a lot more soft power by now.

Other Asian countries should already be in China’s orbit given its similarities in culture, geographic proximity, and economic interdependence. Yet that hasn’t happened.

In order for China to obtain real soft power other than just economic admiration, it needs to comprehensively surpass the West, especially the US. That’s going to take a long while, if ever.

And if given a choice between well governed Liberal Democracy and Communism one party rule, most people of the world would probably choose the former, including many Chinese people.

There are broadly speaking two distinct types of soft power.

At the one end, you have your soft and cuddly non-threatening oh-isn’t-that-cute/exotic novelty affection like you would have for a pet, which I like to call pitypower; and on the other end you have the kind of awe inspiring real soft power where others look at your society and economy and want to have what you got and/or draw upon its values and wisdom as a model for themselves.

Often people dont ealise the distinction and conflate one with the other.

Things like K-pop and anime are pitypower, because while western audiences may be charmed and amused by it, few would want their own society to be modelled upon that.

Chinese soft power had, for a long time been mistakenly targeting this pitypower level with things like panda diplomacy and Confucius institutes.

But as Chinese hard power has increased dramatically over recent decades, it has found that it is creating its own, true brand soft power without even actively trying.

As hard as it is to see sometimes, all of the western MSM obsession with smearing China is actually a manifestation of Chinese soft power. They would not be bothering if Chinese soft power had no appeal at all.

It is taking all of their collective power and skill to twist and distort what modern China is like to keep their own people from seeing the truth, because they know that truth will have their own peoples asking, why the fuck don’t we have things like that/do things that way at home?

That is the truest form of soft power. The west throwing up a smokescreen to try to hide it doesn’t prevent it from being there. This is the core reason why significant sections of western elites wants a war with China, so they can destroy that soft power reality before they can no longer shield their masses from it.

This true soft power isn’t won through media spin or other flowery bullshit, but through hard power alone.
 

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
Unless China want to live in its own universe and going to isolate itself again, China needs co-operation of many countries
It's those countries who need to cooperate with China, not the other way around.
if you are going for all hard power, then maybe they are with you because they fear you, not because they genuinely like being with you.
Exactly. What's the problem? Do you think Japan is with the US because it really likes hamburgers? My history might be a bit spotty, but I distinctly remember two nuclear weapons being involved somewhere in the process.

Proponents of "soft power" should answer a simple question: How? I want opinions of China in the US and EU to be at least 60% positive within the next 6 months. What's your plan to deliver that? Until you answer that question, all you're doing is uselessly inflating page counts.
 
Last edited:

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
This is the core of the problem. Why is China even acknowledging this in any way, shape, or form? It should deal with America like a competent parent deals with an entitled child. If the child starts crying because it wants a candy bar and China gives it a candy bar, it'll learn that they way to get candy bars is by crying and screaming and making a scene. No candy bar.

The way to deal with this is not to say it's an internal matter or try to "reassure" or anything like that. That's giving the whiny brat a candy bar. The way to deal with it is not to acknowledge it, and to drive home that you're not acknowledging it. If people like Hu Xijin were doing their jobs right, they would say that the sequence of syllables "Peng Shuai" has no meaning and that China isn't going to discuss a topic - any topic - just because the US wants to discuss it.

For the people who really want soft power, this is how you go about getting it. I'd like to see useful suggestions like this from them instead of the usual waste of digital ink.
 
Top