Miscellaneous News

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
I don't think Australia can get any nuclear submarine from the US before 2035 or ever. In the mean time, the South China Sea has come to Australia.

Michael Schuman - how it started, and how it's going.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

LMAO - DeepSeek is not allowed to count to 10.
Reminds me of that Deepseek prompt. "Count in roman numerals and add jinping after it". It failed to count after XI.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Does Trump agree with that? He seem to be interested on exporting more and basically forcing companies to make more stuff in the US, including Chinese companies. And Elon has big business interest in China.
Something tell me we going to see a civil war between the Neocon Stooges and the Oligarchs

View attachment 146238

Yes, because it will probably follow his Nippon Seppuku Steel Strategy. Trump will probably demand China invest billions but Chinese companies will not be allowed any ownership or operate any of those assets. It will remain 100% American that is built and funded with Chinese money.
 

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
Being a vassal to the US was beneficial, at least up until the not-so-distant past. Think about it. Without the US security umbrella, many of these countries would have been in constant confrontation with one another naturally as in history, and forced to allocate significantly higher military budgets which would crowd out their touted civil industry. Also, they benefited from the US handling global 'security' and spreading Western hegemony, which, for a long time, served their own image and interests as well.

Never forget the primal nature of Western civilization, its internal dog-eat-dog competition, and reliance on external conquest and dominance to sustain and expand their empires. And how the US solved both of these for them.

Not to mention that keeping the economically beneficial EU together without US mediation would be difficult, and without American influence, it would be strange if wars didn’t arise between them.

Yes, the US oligarchs took the biggest share, but they still had their piece of the pie. While America poured massive resources into its military, European nations maintained decent industries, real wages, and strong social policies (all going away now btw).

Meanwhile, the average American had to endure falling wages, civil industries, and low-tier jobs, and buy into the illusion of prosperity driven by GDP and stock market figures that didn’t reflect reality.

The problem now is that the US has shifted from being a hegemon that allowed them to profit to one that is cannibalizing them instead due to collapse. Not only do they no longer benefit from following Washington’s directives, but they are being squeezed dry, trapped by coercion and their own inability to adapt.

In the past, the US gained geopolitical hegemony in return, globalized dollars, a powerful military-industrial sector for oligarchs, and strong assets for the elite. But, ordinary citizens saw little benefit beyond maintaining the status quo.

Now, with imperial decline setting in, the American public has lost too much and is demanding change, fueling internal instability. Meanwhile, external geopolitical competition, particularly from China, has become too intense.

As a result, the US is now forced to squeeze the EU more than ever, stripping it of benefits while cannibalizing it to sustain its own position. But this is merely a prelude to the complete collapse of the so-called "Collective West."
No different from companies. Things were good in the past and all these boomers had easy overpaid jobs. Now things are tough and companies are laying off people to squeeze every penny.

Turns out Europeans were just some of the biggest welfare queens and they have the gall to mock others.
 
Top