Time to add this to your browsing history. Will help throw off the scent when they try to look for Wumao style content.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Time to add this to your browsing history. Will help throw off the scent when they try to look for Wumao style content.
Expect better consumer spending this year in China due to the stock market DS-moment that finally made everyone realize that Chinese companies also had their moats. Also, Xi's recent meeting played a big part. Now imagine those westoid idiots that were invested in India.
But these moats are mainly in productivity, not value-taking, that's why it took the foreign investors so long to adapt to Chinese market realities from the destructive environments of the US/India.
As the stock market in China rises overall, people will feel more confident about spending money. Totally opposite from the situation in the US that Deepseek caused recently. It shattered their bubble.
Not to mention that ordinary citizens in the US are all over-invested in the US stock market, so this is another way China has at its disposal to accelerate the US collapse and decline if needed which I didn't fully factor in before. Just destroy their stock market and consumerism.
And this is totally organic and based on realism, without excessive financial engineering and delusional hype.
The Sputnik here they are referring to is in terms of the stock market, it served as a wake-up call and catalyst.
Basically previous foreign investors thought that moats are only regulatory capture and high margins (Western/Indian way of thinking),
But in the Chinese case, companies have low margins and aren't politically powerful. But they have brain power and technological moats.
Technological moats that over time make it so that they will price out, out-innovate, and defeat all competition across all industries in the world.
Take SMIC for example, wasn't China's chip industry 'totally anhiliated', then how come its valuation increased by 3-4 times in 6 months?
Collectively, they are the Butthurt 23 for Raimondo.
lol . do you think i take this report seriously. what UK has attracted through its Soft power is not exactly reassuring. so there is no point in surpassing them on that criteria.
do you know what Real Soft Power look like?. Look at Macron speech in January where he was berating African leaders for being ungratefull for what France has done for them but Macron is incapable for spelling out who exactly ousted France from Africa.
It is the same soft power that was instrumental in freeing Viktor Bout from American prison due to his expertize with Africa.
Modern Empire will be built with the only Soft Power that matter and hidden inside it will be hard power.
it is they who are capable of collecting every machine that helps in project like Su-57. This video is from expert residing in Germany but they are sophisticated enough to point out some outside report.
supercat
Major
It appears that the Trump regime is very serious about giving the ultra-rich like himself and Musk some big tax cuts down the road.
I'm a firm believer that there are far more Chinese in China than in the US.
The fact that China built a globally competitive manufacturing sector and has one of the world's high savings-rate is a mistake?
Here is a rebuttal:
The coping tweet of the day: China's every major success is pure luck!
Exclusive: US refusing to co-sponsor UN motion backing Ukraine ahead of war anniversary, diplomats say
- Summary
- US stance appears to reflect widening public split between presidents Trump and Zelenskiy
- US also objecting to language on Russia in G7 statement - sources
- Draft UN General Assembly motion backs Ukraine, demands Russian withdrawal
- One source says resolution being sponsored by over 50 countries, declines to identify them
- Countries can decide whether to co-sponsor motion up until Monday vote
The change in terminology was also reflected in a recent NATO document, I could only find sources in Chinese
北约突改态度：将“俄罗斯侵略”换成“乌克兰冲突”
NATO referred to Russia's devastating war in Ukraine instead of the previous Russia's invasion of Ukraine.Bye, Bye Zelensky
Last edited:
Embarass the cardinal Richelieu of the United States and expect to get shot out of the sky.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Yes this is Western spin as usual. The West raped the world so why don't they examine how that ruined everyone else? The West basically doesn't like their capitalism they've been exercising benefitting someone else. It's like the new Western term "over-capacity" for China. Essentially it's making more than you need personally for to sell to someone else. Why does the West whine about China not buying their goods? That's their over-capacity. Basically that describes every Western country that needs to sell to other markets in order to maintain their first world lifestyles and you know that's important to them. That's what the 2008 Western financial crisis was all about. They had to borrow money they didn't have just to fund their social programs to which their citizens protested from being cut regardless of how it added to their problems. If European countries were reduced to producing to only what their countries have within their borders to survive, they would be third world. Why did they raped the world like they did? Because they had to have more than what they had. First it was colonizing the world. Today they cry about supply chains like never before. Yes they take what other countries have to make things to sell to others so they can make money beyond their countries' means. Now they come up with terms like "over-capacity" and theories like what China does comes at the expense of the rest of the world... That's just to cover up they're worse hence why the spin just for China alone.It appears that the Trump regime is very serious about giving the ultra-rich like himself and Musk some big tax cuts down the road.
I'm a firm believer that there are far more Chinese in China than in the US.
The fact that China built a globally competitive manufacturing sector and has one of the world's high savings-rate is a mistake?
Here is a rebuttal:
The coping tweet of the day: China's every major success is pure luck!
Last edited: