Miscellaneous News

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
the feds are dropping their old toys.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



Anglo American’s troubled ownership of the De Beers group was brought into fresh focus on Thursday as the mining company announced a fresh multibillion-dollar write-down of the diamond group it’s trying to restructure.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
high midstream inventory levels and depressed demand in China for a steep drop in sales in the second half of the year. Anglo expects to remove 10 million carats from planned production this year, after removing 6 million in 2024.
 
Last edited:

Lethe

Captain
Forget Ukraine, Gaza, etc. This is a catastrophe.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



That creative control of 007 had been retained in the infamously prickly hands of Barbara Broccoli and not some big (American!) studio or megacorp is what kept it insulated from the enshittification that has been visited upon so many other once-cherished "intellectual properties" in recent decades. And now that resistance has ended and we can look forward to a shower of 007-flavoured shit going forward. I look forward to Amazon discovering that 007 is actually a beer-swilling, divorced American ex-cop with a pickup truck. What a fucking disaster.

For those who want an inkling as to how disastrous this is likely to be,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Wall Street Journal article from a few months back goes into Barbara Brocolli's role as creative overseer of the 007 franchise and her friction with Amazon over its future. Excerpts:

When it comes to Bond’s future, the power lies in the hands of Barbara Broccoli, who inherited the control from her father, Albert “Cubby” Broccoli, and who for 30 years has decided when a new Bond movie can go into production. She has told friends she doesn’t trust algorithm-centric Amazon with a character she helped to mythologize through big-screen storytelling and gut instinct. This fall, she characterized the status of a new movie in dire terms—no script, no story and no new Bond.

To friends, Broccoli has characterized her thoughts on Amazon this way: “These people are f— idiots.”

The two sides are at an impasse: Amazon needs Broccoli to furnish them with ideas for a new Bond movie, but Broccoli doesn’t want to make a new Bond movie with Amazon. The standoff, say people on both sides of the divide, boils down to a clash between the 20th-century Hollywood of big screens and big swings and a new entertainment industry ruled by Silicon Valley firms that prize data, algorithms and streaming subscriptions.

The Broccoli family’s control of James Bond has few comparisons in contemporary Hollywood, where cherished characters are gobbled up by conglomerates eager to exploit them across screens, toy shelves and theme parks. For decades, studio executives have salivated over the chance to do the same with Bond.

Broccoli has complained that Amazon isn’t a good home for Bond, since the company’s core business is selling everything from toilet paper to vacuums—a perspective Amazon executives find unfair. But since she makes the creative calls that come first—script, casting, story—Broccoli can hold Bond hostage from Amazon for as long as she sees fit. In doing so, she quotes a refrain attributed to her father, a film agent who’d sold hair driers before he secured the rights to adapt Ian Fleming’s novels: “Don’t have temporary people make permanent decisions.”

Before the purchase closed, Amazon executives brainstormed among themselves how Bond could be plugged into their machine. Would Amazon produce a James Bond TV show for its Prime Video service? What about a Moneypenny spinoff? Or a TV spinoff centered on a female 007? Broccoli’s response to such enthusiasm, one friend said, is often the same: Did you read the contract?

Broccoli was irked in one early meeting when Salke referred to James Bond by a dreaded word: “content.” Using such a sterile term, one friend reflected, was like a “death knell” to Broccoli.

Most of the individual 007 films are just "ok". It is the collective tapestry they weave that is interesting: themes and stylistic beats returned to again and again in different keys, change amidst continuity and continuity amidst change. You don't have to think that Barbara Brocolli is a creative or managerial genius to acknowledge and respect the role her creative oversight has played in weaving that tapestry. And now the corporate beancounters have got their hands on it and will undoubtedly drive it into the data-driven ground.

If we go back past examples, Bond is much more likely to become black, bi and a woman.

A non-white Bond would be ok. An essential characteristic of James Bond is that he is British, and the story of the British empire is the story of occupying foreign lands and often incorporating elements of the peoples they encountered into the empire. Persons born of those circumstances often have a complex relationship with the mythology of the British empire and the modern United Kingdom and that offers some interesting storytelling possibilities. A bi James Bond would be much trickier to pull off but not intrinsically unworkable. A female 007 should be unthinkable, because 007's masculinity is, like his Britishness, an essential characteristic of the franchise. You can no more make 007 female than you can make him a plumber.
 
Last edited:

HeiTangSeng

New Member
Registered Member
Anglo American’s troubled ownership of the De Beers group was brought into fresh focus on Thursday as the mining company announced a fresh multibillion-dollar write-down of the diamond group it’s trying to restructure.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
A family member in Shanghai just ordered a 5-carat VVS1 Henan diamond ring set on platinum for less than 19K rmb ~= US$2700.

Real diamond is getting close to costume jewelry prices. Debeers is done, blood diamond is over.
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
Awesome. I'm not a hockey fan, so I'll have to ask this. America won the last game. How can Canada become the champions by winning one game back? Wouldn't they need to win best 2 out of 3 or something?
Team USA's previous win over Canada was in the round robin stage, this game was the final game. It is what it is, cheap entertainment.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Team USA's previous win over Canada was in the round robin stage, this game was the final game. It is what it is, cheap entertainment.
Wow. Americans are really insufferable loud mouths... Over the past days, I've seen many memes of Canada "fucking around and finding out," for insulting the US anthem. There were memes and pics of a bald eagle killing a goose, all that shit, and I was sure that the US had beaten Canada.

Whatever, I thought; that's not the point. The point is one of your staunchest allies hates you now.

But now, you mean to tell me they were cheering some round robin non-elimination bullshit and they were celebrating before they'd even won?? No, they were celebrating before the real fight even started?? My god, Americans deserve to have their mouths stapled shut and I'm not saying that just because it's an enemy state. If my own son made such a mistake, I'd teach him a dire lesson in keeping his reserve to the end.
 
Top