Miscellaneous News

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What China Got Right About Big Tech​

Unlike Trump, Xi understood that a new class of business titans could hijack his country’s political system.

In certain ways, Ma’s story is a uniquely Chinese one. It demonstrates the Communist Party’s obsession with control, as the party has long worked to prevent the emergence of a fully independent private sector in China. It is also part of the saga of Xi, who has worked hard to concentrate power in his own hands and who brooks no rivals in public attention and adulation.

Yet the humbling of Ma—and an entire class of other newly minted, mega-rich tech entrepreneurs in China—also speaks profoundly to political developments in the United States surrounding President Donald Trump’s reconquest of power after four years out of office.
In bringing this new class of business titans to heel, China’s leaders made a carefully considered strategic decision about the direction of their country’s political economy. In effect, they were saying that Beijing would never grant a dominant role to the extraordinarily lucrative and freewheeling private technology sector. Put slightly differently, that sector would have no sacred cows and would never be allowed to cast a shadow on the party and state.

In the emerging Trump regime, we are seeing just the opposite. The administration is a collection of billionaires that almost mindlessly celebrates wealth. On his first full day in office, for example, Trump gathered in the White House with two of the world’s richest men—Larry Ellison of Oracle and Masayoshi Son of Softbank—along with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to salute the launch of a new project called
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, billed as a $500 billion joint venture to build artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Trump’s explanation for why this merited his support was almost childishly vapid. “AI seems to be very hot,” he said. “It seems to be the thing that a lot of smart people are looking at very strongly.”
China has not reined in its tech sector out of any belief in democracy, but rather through a seeming understanding that the new forces of wealth, data, intelligence, information, commerce, and communications can hijack a country’s political system and lead it into dangerously uncharted territory.

Trump, who betrays little technical sophistication, has done the opposite, as he has embraced the big tech sector and celebrated its wealthiest. If this is not challenged, the world might one day look back at this time as the moment when the U.S. state was captured.

Is the MSM allowed to openly praise China now?
 

GulfLander

Captain
Registered Member
View attachment 144308
Which stage of grief is this? Bargaining or depression?

Another excuse that I see people are now doing:
View attachment 144311
View attachment 144310
"It couldn't have been 5.5 million worth of compute! It must have been a lot more than that! They are secretly buying and stockpiling H100 from somewhere!"

Maybe we should start some rumour about how it's actually achieved by having all the Chinese diaspora being bullied by the secret overseas police stations into buying 4090 (and soon 5090) and running them on their PC with some sort of distributed computing software to donate GPU cycles for Chinese AI programs and that's where all the compute are coming from.
Just some observation on those tweets, alot of them are indians, regardless of who enjoy Deepseekr1 or reject deepseek r1.. why isnt india capitalizing on those talents domestically?
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Yeah a distillation size that fits onto a single 5090 seems like a good size, pretty much the most powerful card regular people can get their hands on without having the hookup to get a commercial card through some dodgy channel.

When they said a 70b distillation needs two 4090 how does that work? I thought SLI is no longer a thing with consumer cards, do you just slot two 4090 onto a motherboard and just the PCIE lanes between them is fast enough to handle a model?
The 5090 will have slimmer profile than 4090.... and SLI is for gaming, when it comes to AI it doesnt matter

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Also doesnt make sense to stack 5090s, might as well go for Nvidia Digits, AGI in a lunchbox... 128gb memory, at $3000


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What China Got Right About Big Tech​

Unlike Trump, Xi understood that a new class of business titans could hijack his country’s political system.






Is the MSM allowed to openly praise China now?
That’s why don’t listen to the West when they were taunting how China destroyed its technology future by targeting the likes of Jack Ma. China is experiencing a train of technological wins each saying it was impossible for China to achieve.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

What China Got Right About Big Tech​

Unlike Trump, Xi understood that a new class of business titans could hijack his country’s political system.






Is the MSM allowed to openly praise China now?

As I’ve stated previously, only XJP Thought can save America.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
To create a favorable environment for all types of business entities, it is also imperative to refine the systems underpinning the market economy, take stronger action against monopolies and unfair competition, and conduct law-based regulation and guidance to promote the healthy development of capital.

 

Fatty

Junior Member
Registered Member
Just some observation on those tweets, alot of them are indians, regardless of who enjoy Deepseekr1 or reject deepseek r1.. why isnt india capitalizing on those talents domestically?

The answer is because Indians love to cheap out. You see this all the time in their military procurement, but it’s the case in other sectors too. This is the Indian CEO of an American AI firm offering 1m to an Indian startup to compete with deepseek, and another 10m if they can compete with R1. That amount of money is not even enough for a few test runs to create these models, much less the cost of infrastructure and talent. The AI industry is extremely capital intensive with little immediate gains, kind of the antithesis of what modern Indian culture values.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Just some observation on those tweets, alot of them are indians, regardless of who enjoy Deepseekr1 or reject deepseek r1.. why isnt india capitalizing on those talents domestically?
AI is central to China development, without it how can the CPC led China advance into higher stages of socialism? AI isn't central to India's development, without AI the (often Brahmin) elites can still exploit the surplus cheap labour from the lower class to enjoy a good quality of life. In fact AI developments would actually threaten the ruling class since a large unemployed population in India would be very destabilizing. Can you imagine if millions of call centre workers or the million of workers in small-medium manufacturers in India got replaced by AI and advanced robotics?
 
Last edited:

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator

The answer is because Indians love to cheap out. You see this all the time in their military procurement, but it’s the case in other sectors too. This is the Indian CEO of an American AI firm offering 1m to an Indian startup to compete with deepseek, and another 10m if they can compete with R1. That amount of money is not even enough for a few test runs to create these models, much less the cost of infrastructure and talent. The AI industry is extremely capital intensive with little immediate gains, kind of the antithesis of what modern Indian culture values.

Just hire someone in China to make a DeepSeek knockoff.
 
Top