Miscellaneous News

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
India has the scammers's mindset-"please give us all manufacturing technology,advanced military technology .unlimited immigration to western (especially English speaking )countries ,P5 seat etc FIRST and......THEN we 'll take on China-superpower that we are.Fricking joke and now as geopolitical tensions rise in MEand west caught up in a NATO/Russia war quagmire-India's irrelevance is even more apparent-even Trudeau is deporting/returning so called int'l students-90% of which are from india-basically scam immigrants.
The most amazing thing is their entitlement and complete lack of ability to understand why people don't just give stuff to them for free. Even Jews at least go, I have the money so deal with it. Indians don't even have that.

Again must be that brahmin mentality. Not even the Muslim rulers or Brits could stop it.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
The most amazing thing is their entitlement and complete lack of ability to understand why people don't just give stuff to them for free. Even Jews at least go, I have the money so deal with it. Indians don't even have that.

Again must be that brahmin mentality. Not even the Muslim rulers or Brits could stop it.
From my experience, the typical Jai Hind indian fancies himself a brahmin or something close to it, and if not they justify their crimes, their rapes, their robberies, their cheating etc with the 'get out of jail free card' of "i'll pay them back next life". THe jai hind brahmin therefore believes he is entitled to all because of some supposed good he did in his previous life, since he is now reincarnated as a brahmin, or higher caste compared to what was before.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
Not enough for Europeans to already have a gypsy underclass doing all their menial labor and construction work for pittances but now Poles and others also want a Ukrainian refugee underclass to exploit.

Is there no country in the west that hasn't been built on slavery or pseudoslavery or casteism?
 

mossen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Europeans to already have a gypsy underclass doing all their menial labor
If you actually knew anything about Europe, you would never have written that nonsense. Roma people don't work in formal jobs. Many are drifting and some are "employed" by organised gangs who roam Western Europe begging. Many women are forced into prostitution by their own community males. The idea that Roma people form somekind of backbone of blue-collar work without which Europe couldn't survive is the most hilarious nonsense I've read in a long time.
 

Jamie28

New Member
Registered Member
Not enough for Europeans to already have a gypsy underclass doing all their menial labor and construction work for pittances but now Poles and others also want a Ukrainian refugee underclass to exploit.

Most of the menial work in Europa is done by immigrants, the locals no longer want to work in a production line or in the fields.

And among them there is the belief that they can outcompete China by using the 10-20 million poorly educated eastern europeans like romanians and bulgarians, no one even think that they might go to work themselves to make europe great again rather than exploiting the others, pure brahmin delusion lol.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Translation... US companies are going bankrupt not being able to sell to China.

All this fake bravado bull just to cover-up this basic fact. Yes the US is hurting because their companies can't make money from China. What happened to decoupling with China? That's what decoupling means where all sides disengage and have nothing to do with one another. The irony is that was too much for the West and that's why they changed it from decoupling to de-risking. They wanted China to keep buying from them what they were willing to sell but they didn't want China making money from them. And what's happening instead is the situation is reversed where China isn't buying from them while they're still dependent on cheap products from China because any alternative would cost them more to their fragile debt-ridden economies.

What are US businesses going to do to China if China doesn't give them free reign to sell anything without restriction that the US hasn't already done? Fund mercenary operations to sabotage China? Maybe because the US government now having the backing of US business will more likely start a war with China. The only thing that prevents the US from going to war with China is the fear China will fight back and Americans will die and they can't take casualties like everyone else can. In my previous post in the this thread I mention how US famers think they just have to wait a little bit longer before China submits and starts buying their agricultural goods. Why wait? The US is suppose to have all this clandestine power in their hands. Why not unleash it now? Because they can't for the fear of a greater loss they can't sacrifice for.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"More powerful circles" behind Zelensky have blocked peace, Schröder claims


For the first time, former SPD Chancellor Schröder speaks about his role in the peace talks between Ukraine and Russia. Putin's invasion was a "serious mistake", but Germany should beware of too harsh criticism due to its historical connection to Russia.

Germany's former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder (SPD) has commented on the international situation during an appearance in Switzerland. In the Ukraine war, peace was within reach, Schröder said at an event of the Swiss "Weltwoche". At the invitation of the portal, the former chancellor gave a speech in the Zurich five-star restaurant "Dolder Grand" in front of 500 people.

The ex-chancellor denied the question of whether the black-red-yellow federal government had ever asked him as a diplomatic adviser or negotiator because of his famously good relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. However, he had been contacted by the Ukrainian side – via the Swiss Ringier publishers. This led to his participation in the Istanbul peace negotiations.

He commented in detail on these Russian-Ukrainian summit talks and gave insights for the first time. The Ukrainians had rejected Switzerland as a venue, Dubai had also been rejected, which is why Turkey was finally chosen. Schroeder's wife, an interpreter from South Korea, had kept the minutes.

Contrary to some claims in the media, peace was within reach, Schroeder said. The compromise that he initially had a majority was to keep the eastern territories in Ukraine. For Crimea, there was a "South Tyrolean solution", which would have meant a Russian enclave. Ukraine's accession to NATO would have been rejected in the package for the time being.

But the government of Volodymyr Zelensky was not able to decide freely, Schroeder said, without going into depth here. "More powerful circles" behind Zelensky had blocked peace. It was apparently believed that a continuation of the fighting would weaken Russia strategically. The media and US generals were convinced that they could defeat Putin and remove him from office.

Admonition to the Germans

The former chancellor still considers the war between Russia and Ukraine to be dangerous, warning that the West underestimates that it could escalate. Schroeder criticized Putin's invasion as a "serious mistake." Ukraine – even if it had become a NATO country – would not have posed an acute threat to Russia. But the West overlooks Russia's historically based security interests. "We Germans in particular should behave cautiously and constructively against the background of the Second World War and the crimes committed in the name of Germany," Schroeder said.

He is not against supporting Ukraine in self-defense with financial aid and weapons, but the EU must combine this with demands on the Ukrainian government to present serious and realistic peace scenarios: "This war will also have to be ended with negotiations. In any case, it cannot be decided militarily. Compromises will be needed."

Putin cannot be defeated militarily

Russia cannot be defeated militarily, Schroeder said, and said literally: "I recommend all those who believe this to look into the history books." From Napoleon to Hitler, everyone failed. After initial doubts, the Russians stand behind their president by a large majority. "They are convinced that the West is only using Ukraine as a spearhead to bring Russia to its knees," he said.

He himself catches himself thinking of associating hopes with peace with a politician who is not his favorite, namely Donald Trump. But he trusts him to end the war as promised before he takes office: Trump is "not indifferent" to Europe.

Germany and EU big losers

Germany and Europe were among the big losers of this war – after Ukraine. He regretted that there was no close cooperation between France and Germany, that the two countries had not influenced Washington, as the then President Jacques Chirac had done in the second Iraq war. He himself is not an opponent of the Americans, but there are situations in which the interests of Europe and the interests of the USA would contradict each other. That is the case today. At that time, Putin convinced Chirac of the Iraq error and thereby cleared the way for cooperation with the Germans.
The media and US generals were convinced that they could defeat Putin and remove him from office.
 

Iracundus

New Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Translation... US companies are going bankrupt not being able to sell to China.

All this fake bravado bull just to cover-up this basic fact. Yes the US is hurting because their companies can't make money from China. What happened to decoupling with China? That's what decoupling means where all sides disengage and have nothing to do with one another. The irony is that was too much for the West and that's why they changed it from decoupling to de-risking. They wanted China to keep buying from them what they were willing to sell but they didn't want China making money from them. And what's happening instead is the situation is reversed where China isn't buying from them while they're still dependent on cheap products from China because any alternative would cost them more to their fragile debt-ridden economies.

What are US businesses going to do to China if China doesn't give them free reign to sell anything without restriction that the US hasn't already done? Fund mercenary operations to sabotage China? Maybe because the US government now having the backing of US business will more likely start a war with China. The only thing that prevents the US from going to war with China is the fear China will fight back and Americans will die and they can't take casualties like everyone else can. In my previous post in the this thread I mention how US famers think they just have to wait a little bit longer before China submits and starts buying their agricultural goods. Why wait? The US is suppose to have all this clandestine power in their hands. Why not unleash it now? Because they can't for the fear of a greater loss they can't sacrifice for.

US companies wanted a captive consumer market in China that would keep buying their goods, while remaining low tech cheap labor. The idea they would need to stay competitive or that local Chinese companies would rise up the value chain to match or surpass them was not taken seriously. They basically repeated the same underestimation of Asian competition that they did with Japan. Maybe again it is was done under that racist assumption that Asians only copy and cannot innovate. Just like before, now they are reeling in shock as they find out they are overtaken and being outcompeted.

US farmers are delusional if they think that and I think again it is the (un)conscious racism. The thought the non-white side would hit back does not compute for them.
 
Top