This. Exactly.Q) Speaking about Galwan, the Indian Army never put out the number of the fatalities that the Chinese had suffered. Is there a rough estimation that we have? What is a number that will not enter the arena of speculation?
I don’t want to make an estimate. While the incident happened, we had our OPs sitting and observing the area. We were able to count a large number of casualties, which were being picked up on stretchers and taken back. More than 60 actually, but whether they were fatal or non-fatal, we can't say with authority so I will not give a figure. But recently, TASS, the and I think that could be the figure we can look at.
Indian general Joshi does not even know the number of PLA death from its own source but it relies on a short paragraph Russian news article as a source.
A major general doesn't know about the losses suffered on the opposing side or is playing around with numbers isn't so comforting especially from an Indian perspective. Realistically two or three possibilities are there -
1. That Major is engaging in disinformation tactics. Which is very fair in war and strife context. But that makes all his positions open for great scrutiny for anyone seeking objective facts.
2. The Major indeed doesn't know what exactly happens within China and PLA and have to depend on open source numbers from some news agency that doesn't have a source or author. That's really bad and doesn't bode well in a wider context.
3. The General tries to play down tensions with China. Noble but doesn't look good in the context of China openly divulging Indian losses and even displaying dead bodies. If India doesn't do the same, it means it accepts its weaker position.