Hi, I am a European analyst registered at different defence forums. My father was from communist party so my interest has been in China/Russia and Asia.
I have been let down by quality of discussions on all forums as I believe all of them are echo chambers promoting a false superiority amidst taking potshots at enemy.
India and china are countries of many empires and historically have won and lost several wars. Same is there for China. The Indians assimilated several cultures(Mughals/Kushan) couldn't assimilate British entirely although do use English and so did Chinese. (Cantonese, Manchurian and a number of sinicized groups)
Does this make any of these countries special in terms of war? No. China Burma wars in 1760's remind how a very small country and army can defeat a much bigger army. In India's case, it got defeated by smaller disciplined British armies in1800's.
Now coming to case of China India. why are you guys fighting. None of you can defeat each other. If you could, you would have done it. 1962 for example where a much bigger chinese army took an army quarter of its size. But is situation same. No. Coming to the case of who started it in 2020, I think international opinion does not match chinese opinion. But china did several things to achieve certain strategic things. But question is did they achieve any? In case of India, Indians must question the benefits in a china india war? any?
China was not happy with India on number of things specially India's strategic presence increase but remember throughout 1980-2010, many wise chinese foresaw that doing business with India was good. Currently India was taking advantage of china USA trade war and many chinese strategists did not take it easy. But why? I never understood why you want India to be only on chinese side completely when you support pakistanis more, trade is imbalanced in your favour and you don't want india to grow strategically. The trade imbalance is the reason why Indians can decouple but china has nothing to decouple from.
India should also not get in western trap. It has never been easy for Iraqis or pakistanis so why will it be easy on you.
Welcome to the forum...
I also have some questions I would like to ask
1, is it ok for a foreign country to unilaterally declare your territory as theirs and include it into their newly formed union state, where they don’t even have a presence in the territory?
2, is it ok for a foreign country to start military infrastructure building near the said territory in 1, after they have effectively claimed your territory
3, if the international opinion only shows one side and the other side regardless of how legitimate their claim are, is ignored, then is international opinion even worth anything when one side is considered wrong no matter what they do?
4, if international opinion is against your country then would your country simply fold and cede your territory to the other side?
Now to answer some of your questions
No, it’s not the same situation as 1962, the trigger is still the same where the Indians decided to try their forward policy again... but the relative difference between China and India today is vastly different... in 1962 China was weaker then India, economically and militarily... but today is vastly stronger economically and militarily.
Have China achieved their strategic aims? Maybe, since we can only have an educated guess as to the aims in the first place... but what we can see is, infrastructure have been built and is continuing to be built on the Chinese side, India can barely keep up, large number of troops have been stationed and are training in Tibet and along the LAC, India has also stationed troops and is having to keep a larger then normal numbers having to specifically pull troops from other areas and China has forced India to spend resources on their military instead of other much needed areas like education, while China is well within comfortable spending levels. It’s up the observer to determine for themselves
China didn’t want India to be only on their side.. but simply be neutral and trade with each other, China invited India to BRI (I don’t see how inviting India to BRI is trying to keep India strategically weak, BRI would be throwing money at the Indians), to SCO and many other multinational organisations and initiatives and more often or not it was the Indians who decided they didn’t want to engage. As you said they took advantage of the US China trade war and implemented policies designed to hurt China... so how was China the one acting aggressively? and further should China simply take it and not response? When India arguably need China far more then China needs India...
I would suggest that perhaps you don’t simply take western media’s word only and look at the situation of both sides...