However in India case you get to know about it and gloat. Do you have the same freedom for pla ? It is all hunky dory and no casualties. Two professional army fight and only casualties are on one side .
This is a non argument. In India you get to know about what? and gloat? Yeah these sure sound like great virtues and freedoms. On the topic of casualties. PLA suffered injuries, these count as casualties. Chinese rumours suggest that 2 PLA soldiers eventually succumbed to their injuries. CCP is usually quite tight lipped about casualties so soon after confrontations. Well the PLA hasn't been in a fight for decades but this is certainly the usual pattern from the CCP. Can one say with authority this is a bad thing though? Why do we take it for granted that the government absolutely must tell about all confrontation details immediately after the fact?
Indian government hasn't provided all the details of the confrontations and the few bits of info it has made public are rather strategically valueless. Neither side wants to reveal what they know etc. CCP even if not publicly disclosing
x PLA fatalities and
y PLA injuries and
z PLA soldiers involved, can you honestly say this is out of hiding things? How about it doesn't make any tactical or strategic sense to provide any information outside of the already known and unimportant.
Even if we assume PLA suffered let's say 20 deaths and 50 captured (for sake of argument roughly the same numbers as India). Why should the CCP reveal this? It doesn't advance their agenda and in fact only reveals information however irrelevant to the military objectives.
Now let's think about this topic realistically. We know for a fact (verified by all parties) that India lost at least 20 soldiers (CCP says only 3 were killed by PLA and the rest died from exposure) and India had at least 25 captured. First return was at least 15 men and 10 or 11 senior ranking men were returned about a week after. Again these are the undisputed facts.
Another fact is PLA went from finger 8 to finger 4 and more or less the longitudinal equivalent stretching up to Galwan valley. How is it possible that IA killed any significant numbers of PLA but still managed to get over 2 dozen of their men captured and returned safely. Why will PLA not kill those men on that same night as well if PLA suffered significant fatalities and the PLA already killed at least 3 by their own hands so the precedence has been broken at that point.
Consider also that PLA gained about 1000km^2 of territory which is now more or less admitted to by Indian government and military since they've finally recognised the status quo of old LAC has shifted. What allowed this if IA was on equal footing with PLA? What allowed it if IA killed similar numbers of PLA? India has better supply routes and more troops here. Geographically also in much better terrain and airfields in lower altitudes.
Just out of curiosity what is your nationality? I could see some of the posters are indian , Pakistan and from Bangladesh. It would be good to hear perspective from folks from mainland China and what are their views on this fracas.
I think this direction is fruitless and the equivalent of speculating and comparing speculated death counts. It's not what this conflict is about although it's obviously the most apparent metric to the emotional and dimwitted. Get over your tribalism and think about the content of posts rather than what nationality it belongs to. Attack the evidence and reasoning. And please for the love of truth, refrain from spewing Indian rumour mill BS made up and spread by random bhakts.
