The news never claim anybody fell off the cliff. It first reported that 3 Indian soldiers died and then 17 others died due to serious injures. The deaths of the later 17 lives cost by serious of the injures though it never mentioned how come the injures. Apparently, the soldiers didn't die at the scene. So, the cliff is not in concern. What I want emphasize here is 20 lives is very serious, let alone this caused by cold stone-age weapons. I doubt this news is anywhere near truth.Apparently the location of the standoff occurred was close to a very steep cliff. I would not be surprised in the slightest if some soldiers fell over and were killed during the scuffle.
What's the possibility that there were Bullets involved? It is pretty hard to digest that a gladiator style massive melee match went down in sub-zero temperatures that too on high altitude thin air. We are talking about 100 VS 100 soldiers.
I don't believe that not a single soldier went for their guns. Unless, some kind of vehicles were involved. Maybe someone in the Chinese side decided to use their trucks to ram into Indian troops?
Or maybe someone kept their trucks in neutral and decided to let it roll down a steep cliff (apparently Chinese were at a higher elevation). Maybe there was a group of Indian soldiers who decided to march up the cliff and then one Chinese soldier decided to let the truck in neutral be a bowling ball.
I simply can't fathom how even 10 or 20 deaths can happen with no guns.
Goodness gracious, we're so glad to have a mole like you telling us what the Americans think. Quickly, warn the Indians that they're being used so they withdraw and give up that land to us that you say is so useless! I'm sure they'll agree with you; you can convince someone to agree with you, right? Not every country thinks you're out of your mind to ask them to cede "useless, toxic" territory for "good relations", right? LOLAnother discussion group I am in, an American said it's good for them that China and India are at odds because it lets America pit India against China as another counterweight.
Another discussion group I am in, an American said it's good for them that China and India are at odds because it lets America pit India against China as another counterweight.
What's the possibility that there were Bullets involved? It is pretty hard to digest that a gladiator style massive melee match went down in sub-zero temperatures that too on high altitude thin air. We are talking about 100 VS 100 soldiers.
I don't believe that not a single soldier went for their guns. Unless, some kind of vehicles were involved. Maybe someone in the Chinese side decided to use their trucks to ram into Indian troops?
Or maybe someone kept their trucks in neutral and decided to let it roll down a steep cliff (apparently Chinese were at a higher elevation). Maybe there was a group of Indian soldiers who decided to march up the cliff and then one Chinese soldier decided to let the truck in neutral be a bowling ball.
I simply can't fathom how even 10 or 20 deaths can happen with no guns.
The news never claim anybody fell off the cliff. It first reported that 3 Indian soldiers died and then 17 others died due to serious injures. The deaths of the later 17 lives cost by serious of the injures though it never mentioned how come the injures. Apparently, the soldiers didn't die at the scene. So, the cliff is not in concern. What I want emphasize here is 20 lives is very serious, let alone this caused by cold stone-age weapons. I doubt this news is anywhere near truth.