The majority of Indian Media has supported India;s narrative, with evidence. Bloggers like Shukla are in the minority. Since Indian media articles written by the likes of them are taken seriously here, by that logic the majority of articles supporting arguing India did not lose territory should be taken seriously. Especially since all the available evidence supports them. Like I said, when one person says something and ten people say something different, that should really question the credibility of teh former.
If there is no previous record, we may look at evidence that way, but in India's case, where the majority of media and official sources are known to lie about F-16 shootdowns and killing numbers of "terrorists" as well as the direct incidents in this episode as Chinese videos prove, the majority is no longer trustworthy, nor the defeated, outdated, incorrect evidence that they present. Rather, it is the one whose narrative that most closely follows the proven patterns of India making mistakes and then lying to cover up the consequences.
Guess some members here still haven't come to terms with China's two giant steps back.
Well, there is no definition of giant, as most Indians will want to convey anything that China gives them as giant and anything they lost as minor or even irrelevant, but undeniably, compared to China, India is on a conveyor belt going backwards at all times.
