JF-17/FC-1 Fighter Aircraft thread

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Anyone have any up to date information on the negotiations for China supplying FC-1s to Argentina?
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
What nonsense are you talking about? The guarantor of RD-93 engine is China and not India. Russian talks directly to China for PAF JF-17 engines. Guess what? The person who ink the deal for re export of RD-93 engines from China to Pakistan is Putin.

JF-17 slow induction is more to do with bad financial state of Pakistan.

I don't think you know the definition of slow, 50 aircraft in 3 years is not slow

It took 8 years to get 18 F16 C/D block 52+, and all the money went out of the country, and we still dont have the source codes, 50 aircraft for PAC for its first every assembely of such a aircraft is a feat of engineering for them, more importantly the money stayed in the country to provide jobs for our own citizens, delays and over runs no issue it's a home grown product

And actaully there is no delay in the project there has never been, the list of weapons that have been integrated into platform is enormous, the Block II is on schedule and it's Pakistans national project which gets a lot of resources

I remember people saying when this project started it will never fly, it has, then it will never be inducted, it has and then it will never reach operational status, well it has done that too, same people are now saying we will never see Block II, well somehow I dont believe it
 
Last edited:

Lion

Senior Member
Everybody knows by now that China won't be using a large number of RD-93 for themselves . In other words most of the engines are destined for Pakistan . India on the other hand has leverage with Russia (as largest buyer of Russian weapons) . Therefore , don't expect smooth supply of RD-93s for JF-17 program . Don't have to believe me , check the numbers yourself . ;)

The India leverage has long been rebuke. If India has such leverage compare to China, RD-93 engine re export deal will not even go through in the first place. Can you explain why? And I didn't know being the largest buyer of Russian arms can get sch shabby treatment from Russian with plenty of recontract and delay?

The slow induction and delivery of engines got nothing to do with India leverage urban legend.
 

adeptitus

Captain
VIP Professional
Anyone have any up to date information on the negotiations for China supplying FC-1s to Argentina?

There are various non-confirmed articles on the on-going negotiations and tech transfers. One article claims that the locally produced FC-1 would be named "Arrow III", but these claims cannot be confirmed.

Argentina is also negotiating with Spain to buy used Mirage F-1M's:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


However, the above article may be incorrect on the number of aircraft and cost. Depending on which source, I've seen claims ranging from 8 to 20 aircraft under negotiation.
 
Last edited:

Miragedriver

Brigadier
Anyone have any up to date information on the negotiations for China supplying FC-1s to Argentina?

Details in the press are sketchy at best and of course the rumors in Latin American forums are rampant. However, from what I have been told (and this is not reliable since my source has been misinformed in the past); The details for signing the production contract between the firm FC-1/JF-17 Chengdu Aircraft Corporation and Argentina Aircraft Factory (FadeA), still have to be finalized.

Negotiations have stalled, in terms of the constraints regarding "technology transfer"; however, they represent the first formal attempt for the co-production of Chinese advanced military aircraft in Latin America.

A license agreement that China is seeking is in the range of $us600m to $us740m however, the Argentine government is only willing to pay $300m to $us450m. As a side note I find it amusing that with all the equipment that China has copied from other nation, that they would be so concerned about "technology transfer",

While discussions are said to be far from over, if realized they will open up a wide availability of Chinese weapon systems to Argentina that include the 100 km-range Luoyang SD-10A (PL-12) active radar-guided beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missile (AAM) and the very high speed CASIC CM-400AKG anti-ship missile, which has a range of 180-250 km. Argentina is look at producing between 45 to 60 aircraft.

FAdeA officials are hoping for a potential co-production of the FC-1/JF-17. Nonetheless, the discussions are the first formal effort that could lead to the co-production of a modern Chinese fighter in Latin America. FAdeA officials added that the co-produced FC-1 could be called the 'Pulqui-III', recalling FAdeA's Pulqui-II; Latin America's first swept wing jet fighter, which was designed by Germany's Kurt Tank for the government of Juan Peron.
 

vesicles

Colonel
As a side note I find it amusing that with all the equipment that China has copied from other nation, that they would be so concerned about "technology transfer",

That is easy to understand. Everyone does it. When you are poor, you want the wealthy people to share their money with you (the Democrats). When you become rich, you no longer want to share with anyone (the Republicans).
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
.... Wow that wasn't politically motivated at all..... ::rolls::
the Chinese I believe are more worried about three points.
1) being under cut with there own technologies. They have a almost monopoly status with a number of third world nations and they want to keep it that way.
2) prevent possible secondary export to adversary states and potential adversary states. In the cold war the US and UK both acquired state of the art Warsaw pact goodies by buying them off soured client states including the USAF Buying Chinese built copies right from the factory.
3) potential loss of control. The Chinese government is designed as a huge control freak, most are. If you control the export you have a leash on whoever buys. If they break from you you cut them off. Those systems they bought rust for lack of critical parts.
 

Quickie

Colonel
As far as I can see the JF-17 is a unique design. If people can claim it to be just a copy of say F-16 or Mig 21/J-7, then the flanker can be said to be just a copy of the F-15 or vice versa.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
JF-17 would definitely be a good replacement for argentina's aging fighters, and provide a true BVR and stand off A2G capability at probably the best price to capability ratio in the world, which is probably important given the country's economy isn't exactly roaring.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
Argentina's economy isn't that terrible, actually. It's inflation has been very high, but it's slowed down in recent years. Upside of it was very high, china like GDP growth in last decade or so, which has also slowed down with less inflation in last year or so and is now decent 3-4 %.

There is money in argentina's government, but there is also a purpuseful choice NOT to invest it in military. Military budget has been dropping in relative terms (and staying the same in absolute terms) for the last decade. in 2012 it was 0.92% of the GDP. Huge issue for argentina is that it's a big country with long borders and it has to have a fairly large armed forces, personnel wise. on 4.75 billion dollar budget (2012) that is a huge burden and what's left after personnel expenses is just crumbles. It's actually pretty amazing Argentina found money for both Pampa III programme and this Mirage f1 buy.

If the government chose to increase the defense budget to some 1.5% or so, that'd literally usher a new era for argentina's military, after a decade or more of neglect. But i guess politicians in argetina may be wary of giving money to military. it may make them more influental, and that's the last thing they want.

Who's to say, maybe after Cristina there'll be a new government that will give army a bit more money. Then a 600-700 million programme for jf-17 cooperation won't be a lot of money anymore.
 
Top