We've already discussed this with Blackstone before -- the issue isn't that we don't want different viewpoints, it is that we want to critically vet and scrutinize those viewpoints with some commentary.
The way he's been posting these articles is done without what the community considers to be any sort of meaningful critique, and he hasn't offered any critique despite the repeated requests and criticism by other members.
So the poor quality and content of the articles is coming across as if that is Blackstone's own opinion (which he has essentially admitted is true), and is a tone deaf and passive aggressive way of trying to put forward a position without placing himself on the line, and hiding behind the shield of "it's a legitimate article that deserves to be taken seriously" or something like that.
