J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread V

[AssassinsMace]

Planes are moving objects. Detecting it isn't the same as knowing where it is.

Knowing where it is or was is a big step as opposed to not knowing.

 

[A.Man]

Wild Open

 

[antiterror13]

Spec Ops veterans commented on the J-20, and while they don't believe the J-20 is as capable as the F-22 or the F-35, it nevertheless is a generation ahead of everyone else in Asia. So, without the US protecting them, they're screwed if they somehow got in a fight with China.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I couldn't believe you refer the article above as a truth ... you know it is not ... you just want to believe it is. You are definitely much better than that ... come on!

 

[Equation]

Well, the USAF general interviewed in the video clip a few pages ago clearly says the J-20 is a completely different plane than the F-22. They were designed under different philosophy and with different missions in mind. So clearly, the experts know the J-20 is not a copy of the F-22, not even close.

These self-appointed "experts" think that they are making fun of China. In actuality, they are the fools being laughed at.

Perhaps those same experts got the same info in regards to the J-20 from that FUBAR Taiwanese Air Force Chief who couldn't tell the difference between which planes are which. I'm just saying. Trolls of chicken feathers flocks together.

 

[lllchairmanlll]

Another yellow painted J20 spotted yesterday. Does anyone keep tracking the number?

 

[Blackstone]

I couldn't believe you refer the article above as a truth ... you know it is not ... you just want to believe it is. You are definitely much better than that ... come on!

You don't know what I believe or disbelieve in the article, therefore you could only go with the fact I faithfully summarized its contents, with no injections of personal opinions. There isn't much officially released data about the J-20 to make many fact-based statements, so all of us should be willing to change our views as new facts come out. I understand there are "big shrimps" and such with insider info, and they rightly get serious hearings, but their information are sketchy or incomplete and should be viewed that way.

If there are J-20 biases on my, they usually involve rebuffing claims based mainly on group-think and not on available facts. Ergo, I will continue to link articles and such from legitimate sources that conform to SDF rules.

 

[gullible]

anyone posted this?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[vesicles]

You don't know what I believe or disbelieve in the article, therefore you could only go with the fact I faithfully summarized its contents, with no injections of personal opinions. There isn't much officially released data about the J-20 to make many fact-based statements, so all of us should be willing to change our views as new facts come out. I understand there are "big shrimps" and such with insider info, and they rightly get serious hearings, but their information are sketchy or incomplete and should be viewed that way.

If there are J-20 biases on my, they usually involve rebuffing claims based mainly on group-think and not on available facts. Ergo, I will continue to link articles and such from legitimate sources that conform to SDF rules.

Why do you still believe these articles are legit even after the USAF general clearly stated that the J-20 is different from the F-22? When asked directly whether the J-20 is a copy of the F-22, the general says they are different planes designed for different missions. Are you trying to discredit the USAF general?

And why do you believe opinions of spec ops veterans, who are clearly not pilots and not experts in planes, should be considered as legit source for analyzing the J-20?

It's so clear that the latest article that you posted is not from a legit source. The article is full of derogatory terms clearly with the sole purpose of insulting the Chinese. any article with that kind of bia is clearly propaganda.

 

[siegecrossbow]

anyone posted this?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Don't think so. I've first seen it on CJDBY around two weeks ago.

 

[Equation]

Why do you still believe these articles are legit even after the USAF general clearly stated that the J-20 is different from the F-22? When asked directly whether the J-20 is a copy of the F-22, the general says they are different planes designed for different missions. Are you trying to discredit the USAF general?

And why do you believe opinions of spec ops veterans, who are clearly not pilots and not experts in planes, should be considered as legit source for analyzing the J-20?

It's so clear that the latest article that you posted is not from a legit source. The article is full of derogatory terms clearly with the sole purpose of insulting the Chinese. any article with that kind of bia is clearly propaganda.

LOL..because Blackstone is desperate for anything to put down the CPC my friend! Legitimate article and truth be dam!