J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Engineer

Engineer

Major
hardware said:
View attachment 8085View attachment 8086View attachment 8087
Chengdu proposal for carrier based J-20 (top)
Click to expand...

This has been posted before. Back then, I have pointed out that this was made by fans as a serious paper would not use such terms as "兄弟". Not only that, you can't simply make the wing swept forward on the J-20, as that would completely alter the the aerodynamics and make the plane in-flyable. Basically, the diagram is just something formatted to look like an internal document when it isn't.
 
H

hardware

Banned Idiot
no_name said:
this one?

2rqzsqo.jpg
Click to expand...

not sure, I notice something like a variable nozzle.
 
danielchin

danielchin

Junior Member
Even though Gaoshan is usually a very credible source, but I read someone in a chinese site saying Gaoshan had just made the CG for fun.
 
usaf0314

usaf0314

Junior Member
danielchin said:
Even though Gaoshan is usually a very credible source, but I read someone in a chinese site saying Gaoshan had just made the CG for fun.
Click to expand...

no doubt that this is just a fan art. a forward swept wing will cause too much problems for little benefits. J-20 is already scoring big in agility and speed, it wouldn't make sense to make such drastic changes.
 
P

pissybits

Junior Member
thunderchief said:
And 1200 for J-10B , 1760 for J-16 ? Please translate . :)
Click to expand...

That's how it would appear. It says installed aircraft model: 10b, 16, and 20 for the three different radars, as far as we can tell they mean the (J) 10b, (J) 16, and (J) 20.

If we take this image as authentic, then the J-10b is said to have a 1.5th generation indigenous radar, the J-16 radar is of the 2nd indigenous generation, while the J-20 radar is the 3rd indigenous generation shown in its 2009 state.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top