Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and other Related Conflicts in the Middle East (read the rules in the first post)
- Thread starter phrozenflame
- Start date
You're mistaking HTS and FSA for ISIS. HTS and FSA receive their orders, weapons, and paycheck from Erdogan, Netanyahu and the US. They never attack Turkish, Israeli, or US forces. HTS terrorists have slaughtered Palestinian refugees in Syria, and most recently, have stomped on a pro-Palestinian poster. This latest offensive was carried out by HTS and FSA, not ISIS. Erdogan, Netanyahu, and America are definitely behind this.
I've watched the Syrian Civil War since its beginnings. Its not about whether Assad is fit to run Syria or not. If Syria is surrendered to the Jihadists, it won't become another Afghanistan, but another Libya. The Taliban are a homegrown movement, not the Jihadists in Syria. Many of them are not even Syrian themselves. The incompetence of the SAA and Assad pisses me off. But Syria cannot be abandoned to these barbaric terrorists. It is a betrayal against the Syrian people, and the rest of the anti-Zionist Resistance.
Last edited:
This war is heavily linked to other conflicts in the middleeast.
I don’t think it is worth using another thread when the entire thing is practically all related to each other in one way or another.
They didn't really have a chance yet did they? The kurds are THE hands of Netanyahu in Syria, and the new jihadi "government of salvation" is already killing them whenever they find them. Right hand fighting left hand or mad dog off it's leash?
The thing is most of those are Syrian somehow. How otherwise is there so many of them ready to rise up around in Syria? Air/space intel would have revealed a regular military buildup by the turks.
Imho if you are like Assad and just let large parts of the country be occupied for a long time, people will become angry and restless, they will seek more extreme ideologies.
Mind you I'm not discounting that Assad will not simply win on the battlefield again. I'm just cautiously optimistic that somehow the conflict being restarted is enough to show the Syrian people, and the leader of Syria, no matter who it is, to insist on counteroffensive against US puppet occupation "Kurdistan" and Israeli occupied Golan heights. If it be ISIS who leads the charge or Assad, both are fine as long as the US occupation is jeopardized.
The Kurds are not trustworthy, they take their orders from the US/Israel, but also cooperate with Russia and the SAA from time to time. Recently they went to the Aleppo Int'l Airport ostensibly to help the SAA defend it. Soon after, HTS walks in to the airport with zero resistance. Go figure.
SAA incompetence. That is the only thing I can think that explains this.
Syria has a divided society. But notice that the hotspots for the "rebellion" are mostly located in Idlib and areas controlled by the US. There are no other major hotspots in the rest of Assad-controlled Syria for now. So I won't be so quick to jump to conclusions whether Assad is facing a popular uprising. Radicalized Syrians, Turks, Uzbeks, and other foreign Jihadists don't appear like a popular uprising to me.
HTS, FSA, Kurds, and even ISIS will not attack the Golan Heights. They would rather go after their more vulnerable fellow Muslims first. My guess is that they would rather target Lebanon first before targeting the Israelis. If they win in Syria, that means that the US-Israel axis has won their game in Syria. That is just not a good thing for the anti-Zionist resistance, Russia, and China.
Last edited:
Speak of the devil. Now there are clashes between FSA and the SAA in Daraa, Syria. Daraa was the historical birthplace of the FSA during the early part of the Syrian Civil War. It borders Jordan. So now that FSA terrorists are popping up there, I can kinda guess what is going on.
Its yet another terrorist offensive by the usual suspects. Still not a popular uprising against Assad. But you can be forgiven for thinking that the average Syrians would be pissed at Assad and the SAA.
They are not confusing anything. The US renames these groups and divides them into more smaller ones in order to reduce the risk of it backfiring on them politically, and in order to cause even more division within their ranks, as these are traitors that are money and power hungry, so when the time comes, the US can have them kill each other in order to wipe out the evidence. They are all ISIS and Al-Qaeda. There is plenty of evidence to prove it. We have the White helmet videos, the US/UK training ISIS in Al-Tanf US base videos where they teach terrorists how to talk and act so they don't appear to be extremists. The Jake Sullivan email to Hillary Clinton telling her Al-Qaeda is on the US side etc.. This is not even up for debate. The evidence is just too solid.
UK/UK training ISIS - The video starts with the "rebels" saluting the US and the UK for their support. Hayoo Amreeka means long live America. Hayoo Britania means long live Britain.
RT reports on the White Helmet terrorists
Brian Berletic just released a new report on the situation in Syria
Here is also a screenshot straight out of the Rand Corporation article (Overextending and Unbalancing Russia)
It is not a civil war.
11 years and still a crumbling mess. They truly deserve it. Just from the Darwinian aspect alone, they are not qualified to continue as a state at their current form. They have been given lots of time, help, and still haven't be able to do anything. In fact they have somehow managed to get weaker
There is no betrayal. They are just not fit to lead the country. That's it