Only Assad and the SAA can answer this question. Decades of generous military assistance from Russia, and Iran. But somehow in 2024, they just cannot put together a decent garrison force to fight terrorists riding on pickup trucks with practically zero air support. They look almost like the ex-Afghan government in 2021, and the South Vietnamese regime in 1975.11 years and still a crumbling mess. They truly deserve it. Just from the Darwinian aspect alone, they are not qualified to continue as a state at their current form. They have been given lots of time, help, and still haven't be able to do anything. In fact they have somehow managed to get weaker
Perhaps Assad is not fit to rule over Syria. But then who else is there to replace him? If Russia and Iran abandons him to the terrorists, then Syria would collapse into another medieval failed state like Libya. As much as the SAA and Assad suck at keeping Syria together, there are no available alternatives to preserve Syria as a nation. As for the overall global resistance, losing Syria is a significant setback.There is no betrayal. They are just not fit to lead the country. That's it
Last edited: