I mean, you speak as if you had experience, so I asked you first.
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and other Related Conflicts in the Middle East (read the rules in the first post)
- Thread starter phrozenflame
- Start date
Between @kwaigonegin and @Petrolicious88, it seems even SDF has an unacceptable amount of Westoid Bootlickers. I know @Petrolicious88 is possibly of Indian descent, so that explains that, but what about @kwaigonegin? From Taiwan/Hong Kong?
Please don't tell him what gave it away
kwaigonegin
Colonel
So because I stated one shouldn't be a blind Houthi bootlicker, you are suddenly assuming I am either an Indian or Taiwanese?
Really?
That's a regrettable comment, I would expect that everyone in this thread knew the dangers of believing being part of a master race or the belief of inferior races.
Even though @Petrolicious88 and @kwaigonegin may be wrong their different points of view enrich the discussion more than what you've brought so far.
There has always been some degree of chauvinism and copium on this forum, hopefully all of us can make an effort to keep those outbreaks at bay.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Guys, you need to stop calling people Indians or trying to guess where people are from.
1. It has no meaning. You're from China; another guy is from India; another guy from the US. What does it mean? Argue your points against their points. Doesn't matter where anyone is from.
2. You might very well be wrong. You're most likely wrong in this instance because they'll tell you if they are. Most Indians aren't ashamed of being Indian and they'll get right up and tell you that their India's the best because shitting in the ocean is so much more relaxing than being in a small room on a toilet and how cow shit's the best food in the world but your county's too stupid to eat it. There is nothing at all inconsistent in their writing with simply being Americans or NATO followers. Why are they Indians? If all your points are correct, but the nationality you insisted on someone is wrong, you do yourself a disservice because being wrong on one thing makes your other points look like they may be wrong too.
Last edited:
Why is imperialism in quotes? Are you implying the US is not imperialist?
It honestly sounds like you are describing the US 'military'. They are the ones that constantly bomb and target civilians, mass murdering wherever they are deployed, overthrowing democratically elected leaders, always backing groups that terrorize civilians, such as African warlords and ISIS, employing blockades and sanctions to subject populations to famine and poverty in order to achieve their political goals, using chemical weapons such as Agent Orange and depleted Uranium projectiles, dropping nuclear bombs on civilians. I could go on forever. The points I just mentioned alone, are enough to legally qualify the US to be designated as a state sponsor of terrorism; however, we exist in a world where the US is designated as the leader of the free world and a beacon for democracy.
Thank god I never take my wife and kids with me when I go to Yemen to hang out with my Houthi buddies.
You mean the portion that was imported to the US after collaborating against their nation with the US military, that are now working for the CIA? No surprise there.
Under international law, every state is legally obligated to stop mass murder and genocide, which means that by blocking Israeli designated ships from using the Red Sea, Yemen is in compliance with international law.
Last edited:
It helps knowing what kind of indoctrination they're under by knowing which demographic they're from, so you can avoid lengthy debates that lead to no outcome. For example, speaking logic to a Zionist nutter in America or your average Israeli is like speaking to a rock; they simply cannot register logic because the cognitive dissonance is too strong. Also why people avoid @pmc but occasionally make the mistake of replying and realizing quickly that they've recieved a dose of brain cancer.