D
Deleted member 24525
Guest
I agree on the potential for escalation but not on its scope. What states can realistically enter the conflict? Jordan is a US puppet. Saudi has their own quagmire to worry about. Syria and Iraq are busy trying to hold their own countries together. That leaves Hezbollah, Egypt, and Iran. It's possible Egypt gets involved but I strongly doubt it since they are highly dependent on US arms. So Iran and Hezbollah, the latter of which has already gotten engaged.There is a nonzero chance of this conflict spiraling out of control much like the Marco Polo Bridge Incident turned from an isolated incident to a war engulfing all of China. It really depends whether or not Israel takes the bait and escalates the conflict. While Israel can easily force a return to the status quo, the provocations might be enough for such an escalation. The government stating their intention to raze Gaza doesn't help either.
Iran almost certainly does not have the logistical capability to sustain an invasion attempt of Israel, and even if they did that would invite US intervention so they would not try it. That leaves their conventional ballistic capability and weapons supplies. I don't feel confident making claims about the former, I can say that they will definitely be doing their best to supply Hezbollah. However, with all trade with Gaza cut off, Hamas will be left with what stocks of supplies they have without possibility for outside sustainment. That is why I doubt their capability to conduct a successful guerilla campaign longer term. Vietcong, mujahedeen won because of consistent overland supply from outside powers. Without that Hamas is likely to simply run out of ammunition and food after sufficient time has passed. Moreover they have very little space to hide, unlike the others who had vast rainforests and mountain ranges full of caves.
Last edited by a moderator: