Indian Military News

Status
Not open for further replies.

MwRYum

Major
if i were India, i'd rather worry about spare and parts supply in crisis, rather than saving a few bucks on a money ride and also learn/RE the hell out of it

pictures from India latest wargame :

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Think they're confident that by putting their chips on the West's side, and any potential big war would be one against Pakistan or China, supply and support should be guaranteed...
 

jawad

New Member
IAF's Su-30 fighter plane crashes, both pilots bail out safely

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


PUNE: A Sukhoi-30 MKI fighter aircraft of the IAF crashed soon after taking off from Lohegaon airbase near here but both the pilots managed to bail out safely.

"Both the pilots flying the aircraft ejected in time and landed safely. They have been evacuated and taken to the base for medical attention," IAF spokesperson Wing Commander Gerard Galway said.

The aircraft, which was on a routine mission, had taken off from Lohegaon airbase at 1245 hours. It crashed at 1310 hours, he said.

"A Court of Inquiry (CoI) has been ordered to ascertain the cause of the crash and an IAF team has been rushed to the site of the wreckage," he said in New Delhi.

He said the aircraft lost contact with the base after apparently developing a technical problem, but the pilots managed to eject out safely in time. No casualty was reported on the ground, he said.

Pune Collector Vikas Deshmukh said the plane caught fire after crashing at an open forest department land. Fire tenders from the vicinity had been rushed to the spot, he said.

This is the third crash of the Russian origin Su-30 fighter planes since they were inducted into the IAF in 1997.

Today's crash is the eighth mishap involving IAF fighter aircraft this year. Seven MiG series aircraft had crashed earlier this year.


Before the SU-30 accident, a MiG-21 Bison had crashed in Sirsa in Haryana on December 2. During last three years, the IAF has lost 30 fighter aircraft and 10 helicopters in various crashes.


26 defence personnel including 13 pilots have lost their lives in these crashes along with six civilians on the ground.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


New Delhi: Defence Ministry on Wednesday said it was surprised over the crash of one of its frontline Su-30MKI fighter aircraft, which are the latest and most-advanced war planes in IAF inventory, and ordered a probe into it.

"I am surprised that an aircraft of this type has crashed... We will certainly look into the reasons for this. A Court of Inquiry (CoI) has been order to look into the reasons behind the crash," Minister of State for Defence M M Pallam Raju told reporters here.


The minister was asked to comment on the air crash involving the Su-30MKI aircraft which happened yesterday near Pune.

The Su-30s fighter aircraft were inducted into the IAF in the late 90s and the advanced 'MKI' version of the planes started being inducted in the early part of the millennium and are considered to be new in service.

The particular aircraft which crashed yesterday was built in the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).


The aircraft had taken off from the Lohegaon airbase on a routine mission, presumably developed a technical snag and crashed at Wade Bholai village, about 20 km from Pune. Both the pilots ejected to safety.

The jet crashed at 1.30 pm, around 50 minutes after it took off, officials said.

This is the third time a Sukhoi fighter plane crashed since their induction into the IAF.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
there is a world of a difference between peace time operations and war time operations, in peace time a well flown aircraft will fly 20 hours per month, but in war time this number can be as high as 100 hours or even more

as flying hours go up so does attrition rate, India has a very bad history of operational maintenace, overhaul and servicing, they just dont look after thier fighters

PAF A5s had a better rate than Su30 has, can u imagine IAF losses in time of war, they will sky rocket if a war footing goes on
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A nuclear submarine leased from Russia is all set to join the Indian Navy in early 2012. Official sources in New Delhi confirmed today that a Nerpa class nuclear submarine leased for 10 years by the Indian Navy will leave Russian shores by end of the month. The confirmation of this long-speculated development came hours before Prime Minister Manmohan Singh reached Moscow to attend the 12th bilateral Indo-Russian summit with President Dimitri Medvedev.
 

paintgun

Senior Member
not really news, but good pictures nevertheless

IAF Adour engine maintenance facility

rriadour0141.jpg

rriadour0011.jpg

rriadour0021.jpg

MKI production line

 

paintgun

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Bangalore: The Sukhoi (Su-30 MKI) that crashed near Pune on December 13 was on its first air test (fly test) after it underwent the mandatory servicing. The aircraft had already completed 400 hours of flying and had to do undergo a second servicing (after every 200 hours) as per the Indian Air Force (IAF) norms. Sources with the investigation team tell Express that the fighter crashed after oscillating – a rare phenomenon if the platform was not under control. “The pilots couldn't control the aircraft and it crashed without any warning, clearly pointing towards system and quality issues,” sources said.

...
 

Indianfighter

Junior Member
there is a world of a difference between peace time operations and war time operations, in peace time a well flown aircraft will fly 20 hours per month, but in war time this number can be as high as 100 hours or even more
IAF's average is 200 hours per year or little less than 20 hrs per month.

PAF A5s had a better rate than Su30 has, can u imagine IAF losses in time of war, they will sky rocket if a war footing goes on
That's completely wrong. There have been 5 PAF A-5 crashes since 2000. And this, when its TOTAL A-5 fleet consisted of just 42 odd jets since 2000.

In comparison, Su-30 has crashed thrice since 1997, when its fleet since 2000 numbered 42+.
 

Scratch

Captain
And a small news bit on the indian carrier front:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


PICTURE: MiG-29K gets on board Indian aircraft carrier
By: Vladimir Karnozov Moscow - 11:32 21 Dec 2011

With work on the Indian navy's future aircraft carrier the INS Vikramaditya now 90% complete, an RSK MiG-29K fighter has been placed aboard the vessel for the first time.
Pictured on the carrier's deck at the Sevmash dockyard in Severodvinsk, northern Russia during November, aircraft Side 311 was deployed using a crane to serve as a mock-up only.

According to Sevmash, the Vikramaditya will start sea trials in May 2012, with these to involve take-offs and landings using two industry-owned aircraft. One is a purpose-built MiG-29K, while the other is a MiG-35D two-seat demonstrator now being modified after the crash of a MiG-29KUB trainer during trials in 2011.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Originally introduced to service with the Russian navy in 1987 as the Baku, but deactivated in 1992, the modified Vikramaditya now features a "ski-jump" ramp and three arrestor wires to support fighter operations. New Delhi's total investment in the ship is worth around $2 billion, with Sevmash expecting it to be commissioned into service on 4 December 2012 - Indian navy day.

Russia has so far delivered 11 of the 16 MiG-29K/KUBs ordered for the Indian navy under a 2003 deal worth $530 million, with the remainder due to be shipped to Goa before the end of 2011.
India also this year firmed up an option for 29 more navalised MiG-29s to equip its future homegrown aircraft carriers.
 

MwRYum

Major
Happened to come across this...

1325503337331.jpg


Now what the hack is this? The hull ain't complete and they so eager to do this already?
 

Obi Wan Russell

Jedi Master
VIP Professional
The slipway wasn't long enough to build the whole hull in one piece. The Italian Warship building industry has never built anything that large before (Garibaldi was a good 10-12,000 tonnes smaller), so the bows of the ship were assembled elsewhere. After launch the two halves of the ship were joined together in a drydock. The rest of the Island was lifted aboard in one huge block as well.
 

Attachments

  • doria02.jpg
    doria02.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 15
  • cavour_06.jpg
    cavour_06.jpg
    45.4 KB · Views: 20
  • cavour01rb4.jpg
    cavour01rb4.jpg
    94.9 KB · Views: 61
  • cavour2.jpg
    cavour2.jpg
    64.4 KB · Views: 16
  • doriabow 01.jpg
    doriabow 01.jpg
    47.1 KB · Views: 17
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top