broadsword
Brigadier
Vikrant has a bulbous bow, a clit-ish one.
Here's the thing: they haven't.One should not let the shallow and uncouth delights of taking cheap shots obscure the fact that people who actually managed to build real aircraft carriers
You know, I think you're right about this. I've given what you said some thought and I've got an idea about what this design feature is for. It's really quite brilliant when you think about it.naval history is replete with examples of countries that did things differently from a consensus of everyone else for very good reasons. In some cases the good reasons reflect the particular circumstances of that country, not shared by everyone else. In other cases events prove the odd man out actually made the better choice than the consensus of everyone else.
I can't really find a picture of the Vikrant in dry dock, I mean, it has to have a bulbuous bow. Without it, the ship would be like a car has springs but no shock absorbers, and up/down motion would make it a East LA style lowrider.
I do hope Indian ship designers aren't that stupid. Then you never know, having extra left over parts and not sure where they belong to when they overhaul a fight jet is one thing, missing a entire segment of a billion dollar ship is really something else.
What is the Indian aircraft carrier's "forgot" bulbous bow?In fact, it's a "feeling drama" of insufficient infrastructure